Hydraulic jump dynamics above supercell thunderstorms

Science ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 373 (6560) ◽  
pp. 1248-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan E O’Neill ◽  
Leigh Orf ◽  
Gerald M. Heymsfield ◽  
Kelton Halbert
2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1599-1609
Author(s):  
Habib A.A. ◽  
Abdel-Azim M. Ali ◽  
Abd-Allh Y.M ◽  
Saleh y.k.

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (12) ◽  
pp. 04020079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Francisco Macián-Pérez ◽  
Arnau Bayón ◽  
Rafael García-Bartual ◽  
P. Amparo López-Jiménez ◽  
Francisco José Vallés-Morán

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 581
Author(s):  
Matthew Van Den Broeke

Many nontornadic supercell storms have times when they appear to be moving toward tornadogenesis, including the development of a strong low-level vortex, but never end up producing a tornado. These tornadogenesis failure (TGF) episodes can be a substantial challenge to operational meteorologists. In this study, a sample of 32 pre-tornadic and 36 pre-TGF supercells is examined in the 30 min pre-tornadogenesis or pre-TGF period to explore the feasibility of using polarimetric radar metrics to highlight storms with larger tornadogenesis potential in the near-term. Overall the results indicate few strong distinguishers of pre-tornadic storms. Differential reflectivity (ZDR) arc size and intensity were the most promising metrics examined, with ZDR arc size potentially exhibiting large enough differences between the two storm subsets to be operationally useful. Change in the radar metrics leading up to tornadogenesis or TGF did not exhibit large differences, though most findings were consistent with hypotheses based on prior findings in the literature.


1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1381-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Chippada ◽  
B. Ramaswamy ◽  
M. F. Wheeler

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Étienne Rolley ◽  
Claude Guthmann ◽  
Michael S. Pettersen ◽  
Christophe Chevallier
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (7) ◽  
pp. 2064-2079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Weiss ◽  
Donald R. MacGorman ◽  
Kristin M. Calhoun

Abstract This study uses data from the Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array (OK-LMA), the National Lightning Detection Network, and the Norman, Oklahoma (KOUN), prototype Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) radar to examine the evolution and structure of lightning in the anvils of supercell storms as they relate to storm dynamics and microphysics. Several supercell storms within the domain of the OK-LMA were examined to determine whether they had lightning in the anvil region, and if so, the time and location of the initiation of the anvil flashes were determined. Every warm-season supercell storm had some flashes that were initiated in or near the stronger reflectivities of the parent storm and propagated 40–70 km downstream to penetrate well into the anvil. Some supercell storms also had flashes that were initiated within the anvil itself, 40–100 km beyond the closest 30-dBZ contour of the storm. These flashes were typically initiated in one of three locations: 1) coincident with a local reflectivity maximum, 2) between the uppermost storm charge and a screening-layer charge of opposite polarity near the cloud boundary, or 3) in a region in which the anvils from two adjoining storms intersected. In some storms, anvil flashes struck ground beneath a reflectivity maximum in which reflectivity ≥20 dBZ had extended below the 0°C isotherm, possibly leading to the formation of embedded convection. This relationship may be useful for identifying regions in which there is a heightened risk for cloud-to-ground strikes beneath anvil clouds. In one storm, however, anvil lightning struck ground even though this reflectivity signature was absent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document