Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adults: Epidemiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Therapy

2014 ◽  
pp. 117-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey B. Rubins ◽  
David R. Boulware ◽  
Edward N. Janoff
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Shoar ◽  
Fernando H Centeno ◽  
Daniel M Musher

Abstract Background Long regarded as the second most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), Haemophilus influenzae has recently been identified with almost equal frequency as pneumococcus in patients hospitalized for CAP. The literature lacks a detailed description of the presentation, clinical features, laboratory and radiologic findings, and outcomes in Haemophilus pneumonia. Methods During 2 prospective studies of patients hospitalized for CAP, we identified 33 patients with Haemophilus pneumonia. In order to provide context, we compared clinical findings in these patients with findings in 36 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia identified during the same period. We included and analyzed separately data from patients with viral coinfection. Patients with coinfection by other bacteria were excluded. Results Haemophilus pneumonia occurred in older adults who had underlying chronic lung disease, cardiac conditions, and alcohol use disorder, the same population at risk for pneumococcal pneumonia. However, in contrast to pneumococcal pneumonia, patients with Haemophilus pneumonia had less severe infection as shown by absence of septic shock on admission, less confusion, fewer cases of leukopenia or extreme leukocytosis, and no deaths at 30 days. Viral coinfection greatly increased the severity of Haemophilus, but not pneumococcal pneumonia. Conclusions We present the first thorough description of Haemophilus pneumonia, show that it is less severe than pneumococcal pneumonia, and document that viral coinfection greatly increases its severity. These distinctions are lost when the label CAP is liberally applied to all patients who come to the hospital from the community for pneumonia.


Vaccine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (13) ◽  
pp. 1460-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chamira Rodrigo ◽  
Thomas Bewick ◽  
Carmen Sheppard ◽  
Sonia Greenwood ◽  
Caroline Trotter ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Salge-Arrieta ◽  
R. Carrasco-Moro ◽  
V. Rodríguez-Berrocal ◽  
H. Pian ◽  
J. S. Martínez-San Millán ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidias E Leon-S ◽  
Kimiyoshi Arimura ◽  
Mitsuhiro Osame

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and HTLV-I associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) can overlap in their clinical features and thereby cause difficulties for clinicians in relation to diagnosis and therapy. However, epidemiological biochemical, immunological, virological and radiological studies point to a number of significant differences. Recent comparative neurophysiological data, induding blink reflex studies, obtained in these disorders, is briefly reviewed here and provides additional evidence of difference. The abnormal blink reflex in patients with MS consist of prolonged latencies and absences of R1 and R2 responses and are mainly due to demyelinating lesions around the pons. In contrast, in HAM/TSP the blink reflex abnormalities frequently include an unusual early response, R/k, which is probably a consequence of interneuronal hyperexcitability around the brainstem. Thus these findings provide further support for our contention that HAM/TSP and multiple sclerosis are distinctly different both as clinical entities and in their underlying pathomechanisms.


Author(s):  
Mark Harrison

This chapter describes the microbiology of malaria as it applies to Emergency Medicine, and in particular the Primary FRCEM examination. The chapter outlines the key details of the epidemiology, clinical features, basis of diagnosis, and therapy of malaria, including falciparum malaria and benign malaria. This chapter is laid out exactly following the RCEM syllabus, to allow easy reference and consolidation of learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document