scholarly journals Activity of Voriconazole Combined with Neutrophils or Monocytes against Aspergillus fumigatus: Effects of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor

1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 2299-2303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shefali Vora ◽  
Sharda Chauhan ◽  
Elmer Brummer ◽  
David A. Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Antifungal Activity ◽  
Aspergillus Fumigatus ◽  
Amphotericin B ◽  
Hyphal Growth ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Stimulating Factor

ABSTRACT Voriconazole (VCZ) was tested for antifungal activity againstAspergillus fumigatus hyphae alone or in combination with neutrophils or monocytes. Antifungal activity was measured as percent inhibition of hyphal growth in assays using the dye MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] or XTT [2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide]. With both assays, VCZ inhibited hyphal growth at concentrations of <1 μg/ml and was almost as active as amphotericin B. VCZ (0.6 μg/ml) was sporicidal, as was amphotericin B (0.4 μg/ml). With both the MTT and XTT assays, neutrophils alone inhibited hyphae; when combined with VCZ, there was additive activity. Both granulocyte colony-stimulating factor- and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-treated polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) had enhanced inhibition of hyphal growth. Moreover, such treatment of PMN also enhanced the collaboration of PMN with VCZ. Monocytes inhibited hyphal growth. When VCZ was combined with monocytes or monocytes were treated with GM-CSF, inhibition was significantly increased, to similar levels. However, the combination of VCZ with GM-CSF treatment of monocytes did not significantly increase the high-level inhibition by monocytes with either agent alone.

Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Progenitor-Cell Mobilization: High-Dose Cyclophosphamide Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Versus Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Plus G-CSF

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1824-1830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer N. Koç ◽  
Stanton L. Gerson ◽  
Brenda W. Cooper ◽  
Mary Laughlin ◽  
Howard Meyerson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Hematopoietic Progenitor ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE: Patient response to hematopoietic progenitor-cell mobilizing regimens seems to vary considerably, making comparison between regimens difficult. To eliminate this inter-patient variability, we designed a cross-over trial and prospectively compared the number of progenitors mobilized into blood after granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) days 1 to 12 plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 7 to 12 (regimen G) with the number of progenitors after cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF days 3 to 14 (regimen C) in the same patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive either regimen G or C first (G1 and C1, respectively) and underwent two leukaphereses. After a washout period, patients were then crossed over to the alternate regimen (C2 and G2, respectively) and underwent two additional leukaphereses. The hematopoietic progenitor-cell content of each collection was determined. In addition, toxicity and charges were tracked. RESULTS: Regimen C (n = 50) resulted in mobilization of more CD34+ cells (2.7-fold/kg/apheresis), erythroid burst-forming units (1.8-fold/kg/apheresis), and colony-forming units–granulocyte-macrophage (2.2-fold/kg/apheresis) compared with regimen G given to the same patients (n = 46; paired t test, P < .01 for all comparisons). Compared with regimen G, regimen C resulted in better mobilization, whether it was given first (P = .025) or second (P = .02). The ability to achieve a target collection of ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg using two leukaphereses was 50% after G1 and 90% after C1. Three of the seven patients in whom mobilization was poor after G1 had ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg with two leukaphereses after C2. In contrast, when regimen G was given second (G2), seven out of 10 patients failed to achieve the target CD34+ cell dose despite adequate collections after C1. Thirty percent of the patients (nine of 29) given regimen C were admitted to the hospital because of neutropenic fever for a median duration of 4 days (range, 2 to 10 days). The higher cost of regimen C was balanced by higher CD34+ cell yield, resulting in equivalent charges based on cost per CD34+ cell collected. CONCLUSION: We report the first clinical trial that used a cross-over design showing that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF results in mobilization of more progenitors then GM-CSF plus G-CSF when tested in the same patient regardless of sequence of administration, although the regimen is associated with greater morbidity. Patients who fail to achieve adequate mobilization after regimen G can be treated with regimen C as an effective salvage regimen, whereas patients who fail regimen C are unlikely to benefit from subsequent treatment with regimen G. The cross-over design allowed detection of significant differences between regimens in a small cohort of patients and should be considered in design of future comparisons of mobilization regimens.

Role of Protein Kinase C in Expression of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor in Lung Cancer Cells.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4210-4210
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Uemura ◽  
Makoto Kobayashi ◽  
Hideshi Nakata ◽  
Tetsuya Kubota ◽  
Hirokuni Taguchi
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Abstract Many cases of tumors that produce granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have been reported. However, the biological properties regulatory mechanisms of the overproduction of G-CSFor GM-CSF by tumor cells are not well known. We present the role of protein kinase C (PKC) pathways in the constitutive expression of G-CSF and GM-CSF by lung cancer cells. We previously established two lung cancer cell lines, OKa-C-1 and MI-4, that constitutively produce an abundant dose of G-CSF and GM-CSF. We showed that the PKC activator; phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) stimulated the production of GM-CSF in a dose-dependent manner and inversely reduced G-CSF in the cell lines. These effects of PMA were antagonized by PKC inhibitor; staurosporine. The induction of GM-CSF expression by PMA was mediated through the activations of nuclear factor (NF)-kB activation. The induction of G-CSF expression by staurosporine was mediated through p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway signaling. PMA accelerated cell growth and inhibited cell death in the cell line. Whereas staurosporine acted inversely. GM-CSF induced by PMA might stimulate cell growth and suppress cell death. G-CSF expression by staurosporine appears to be related to the activation of p44/42 MAPK, and GM-CSF by PMA to NF-kB in OKa-C-1 and MI-4 cells. Figure Figure

scholarly journals Recombinant human stem cell factor enhances the formation of colonies by CD34+ and CD34+lin- cells, and the generation of colony-forming cell progeny from CD34+lin- cells cultured with interleukin-3, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

Blood ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 2316-2321 ◽  
Author(s):  
ID Bernstein ◽  
RG Andrews ◽  
KM Zsebo
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell Factor ◽  
Liquid Culture ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Human Stem Cell ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Stimulating Factor

We tested the ability of recombinant human stem cell factor (SCF) to stimulate isolated marrow precursor cells to form colonies in semisolid media and to generate colony-forming cells (CFC) in liquid culture. SCF, in combination with interleukin-3 (IL-3), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) caused CD34+ cells to form increased numbers of granulocyte-macrophage colonies (CFU-GM), and to form macroscopic erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) in the presence of IL-3, erythropoietin (Epo), and SCF. We tested isolated CD34+lin- cells, a minor subset of CD34+ cells that did not display antigens associated with lymphoid or myeloid lineages, and CD34+lin+ cells, which contain the vast majority of CFC, and found that the enhanced colony growth was most dramatic within the CD34+lin- population. CD34+lin- cells cultured in liquid medium containing SCF combined with IL-3, GM-CSF, or G-CSF gave rise to increased numbers of CFC. Maximal numbers of CFU-GM were generated from CD34+lin- cells after 7 to 21 days of culture, and required the presence of SCF from the initiation of liquid culture. The addition of SCF to IL-3 and/or G-CSF in cultures of single CD34+lin- cells resulted in increased numbers of CFC due to the proliferation of otherwise quiescent precursors and an increase in the numbers of CFC generated from individual precursors. These studies demonstrate the potent synergistic interaction between SCF and other hematopoietic growth factors on a highly immature population of CD34+lin- precursor cells.

Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide cancer therapy.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 628-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Bregni ◽  
S Siena ◽  
M Di Nicola ◽  
A Dodero ◽  
F Peccatori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
World Health ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Hematopoietic Progenitors ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE We compared hematologic and clinical effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX, 7 g/m2), given as the first phase of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy program that includes a myeloablative therapy with mobilized progenitor cell autografting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-nine consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, or poor-prognosis breast cancer received GM-CSF (n = 27) or G-CSF (n = 22) after HD-CTX in two consecutive, nonrandomized studies. Cytokines were administered in continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion for 14 to 15 days at a median dose of 5.5 and 10 micrograms/kg/d, respectively, starting 24 hours after HD-CTX. RESULTS Neutrophil recovery was faster with G-CSF administration (11.5 v 13.2 days; P = .01), whereas platelet counts recovered more rapidly with GM-CSF (13.7 v 16.6 days; P = .01). Prophylactic platelet transfusions were administered more frequently to patients treated with G-CSF than with GM-CSF (66% v 22% of the patients; P = .02). No clinically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning days of absolute neutropenia or neutropenic fever. Both cytokines reduced the time to eligibility for subsequent chemotherapy administration compared with historical controls not given cytokine (14 to 16 v 20 days). Both cytokines increased circulation of hematopoietic progenitors. Most side effects were World Health Organization (WHO) median grade 1 to 2, were more frequent during GM-CSF than during G-CSF treatment, and were reversible by simple supportive measures and/or by dose reduction or suspension of the cytokine. Permanent suspension of cytokine administration was never required in either group. CONCLUSION GM-CSF or G-CSF administration after HD-CTX reduces hematologic toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and induces circulation of large amounts of hematopoietic progenitors suitable for autografting in cancer patients.

scholarly journals Impaired response to GM-CSF and G-CSF, and enhanced apoptosis in C/EBPβ-deficient hematopoietic cells

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 111 (6) ◽  
pp. 2999-3004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadayuki Akagi ◽  
Takayuki Saitoh ◽  
James O'Kelly ◽  
Shizuo Akira ◽  
Adrian F. Gombart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow Cells ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Susceptibility To Infection ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Macrophage Colony ◽  
Stimulating Factor ◽  
Deficient Mice

Abstract Transcription factors known as CCAAT enhancer binding proteins (C/EBPs) are involved in hematopoietic differentiation, including myelopoiesis and granulopoiesis. C/EBPβ-deficient mice develop normally; however, they exhibit defective macrophage function, resulting in increased susceptibility to infection. Little is known about the role of C/EBPβ in granulopoiesis; therefore, we examined granulopoiesis in C/EBPβ-deficient mice. Morphology, the number of peripheral blood and bone marrow cells, and the expression of genes specific for the myeloid lineage were normal in C/EBPβ-deficient mice. Interestingly, the hematopoietic progenitor cells of C/EBPβ-deficient mice did not respond normally to granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor and granulocyte colony stimulating factor. In addition, C/EBPβ-deficient neutrophils displayed enhanced apoptosis compared with wild-type neutrophils. Our present results indicate that C/EBPβ helps regulate survival of neutrophils, downstream of the granulocyte colony stimulating factor receptor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document