scholarly journals Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins Cooperate with LANA during the G1/S Phase of the Cell Cycle To Support Viral DNA Replication

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prerna Dabral ◽  
Timsy Uppal ◽  
Cyprian C. Rossetto ◽  
Subhash C. Verma
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Viral Genome ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Viral Origin ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Mcm Complex ◽  
Cellular Replication ◽  
Cellular Dna

ABSTRACTLatency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) is essential for maintaining the viral genome by regulating replication and segregation of the viral episomes. The virus maintains 50 to 100 episomal copies during latency and replicates in synchrony with the cellular DNA of the infected cells. Since virus lacks its own replication machinery, it utilizes the cellular proteins for replication and maintenance, and LANA has been shown to make many of these proteins available for replication by directly recruiting them to the viral origin of replication within the terminal repeat (TR) region. Our studies identified members of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex as potential LANA-interacting proteins. Here, we show that LANA specifically interacts with the components of the MCM complex, primarily during the G1/S phase of the cell cycle. MCM3 and -4 of the MCM complex specifically bound to the amino-terminal domain, while MCM6 bound to both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains of LANA. The MCM binding region in the N-terminal domain mapped to the chromatin binding domain (CBD). LANA with point mutations in the carboxyl-terminal domain identified an MCM6 binding domain, and overexpression of that domain (amino acids [aa] 1100 to 1150) abolished TR replication. Introduction of a peptide encompassing the LANA aa 1104 to 1123 reduced MCM6 association with LANA and TR replication. Moreover, a recombinant Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) expressing LANA with a deletion of aa 1100 to 1150 (BAC16Δ1100–1150, where BAC is bacmid) showed reduced replication and persistence of viral genome copies compared to levels with the wild-type BAC16. Additionally, the role of MCMs in viral replication was confirmed by depleting MCMs and assaying transient and long-term maintenance of the viral episomes. The recruitment of MCMs to the replication origins through LANA was demonstrated through chromatin immunoprecipitation and isolation of proteins on nascent replicated DNA (iPOND). These data clearly show the role of MCMs in latent DNA replication and the potential for targeting the C-terminal domain of LANA to block viral persistence.IMPORTANCELANA-mediated latent DNA replication is essential for efficient maintenance of KSHV episomes in the host. During latency, virus relies on the host cellular machinery for replication, which occurs in synchrony with the cellular DNA. LANA interacts with the components of multiple cellular pathways, including cellular replication machinery, and recruits them to the viral origin for DNA replication. In this study, we characterize the interactions between LANA and minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins, members of the cellular replication complex. We demonstrated a cell cycle-dependent interaction between LANA and MCMs and determined their importance for viral genome replication and maintenance through biochemical assays. In addition, we mapped a 50-amino acid region in LANA which was capable of abrogating the association of MCM6 with LANA and blocking DNA replication. We also detected LANA along with MCMs at the replication forks using a novel approach, isolation of proteins on nascent DNA (iPOND).

scholarly journals Drosophila Minichromosome Maintenance 6 Is Required for Chorion Gene Amplification and Genomic Replication

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Schwed ◽  
Noah May ◽  
Yana Pechersky ◽  
Brian R. Calvi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genetic Dissection ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Multiple Origins ◽  
Origin Licensing ◽  
Mcm Complex ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Prereplicative Complex ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Duplication of the eukaryotic genome initiates from multiple origins of DNA replication whose activity is coordinated with the cell cycle. We have been studying the origins of DNA replication that control amplification of eggshell (chorion) genes duringDrosophila oogenesis. Mutation of genes required for amplification results in a thin eggshell phenotype, allowing a genetic dissection of origin regulation. Herein, we show that one mutation corresponds to a subunit of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex of proteins, MCM6. The binding of the MCM complex to origins in G1 as part of a prereplicative complex is critical for the cell cycle regulation of origin licensing. We find that MCM6 associates with other MCM subunits during amplification. These results suggest that chorion origins are bound by an amplification complex that contains MCM proteins and therefore resembles the prereplicative complex. Lethal alleles of MCM6 reveal it is essential for mitotic cycles and endocycles, and suggest that its function is mediated by ATP. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of MCMs in the coordination of DNA replication during the cell cycle.

Essential role of human CDT1 in DNA replication and chromatin licensing

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (7) ◽  
pp. 1435-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mickael Rialland ◽  
Francesco Sola ◽  
Corrado Santocanale
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Complex Formation ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Origin Recognition Complex ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Transformed Cells ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance

Formation of pre-replicative complexes at origins is an early cell cycle event essential for DNA duplication. A large body of evidence supports the notion that Cdc6 protein, through its interaction with the origin recognition complex, is required for pre-replicative complex assembly by loading minichromosome maintenance proteins onto DNA. In fission yeast and Xenopus, this reaction known as the licensing of chromatin for DNA replication also requires the newly identified Cdt1 protein. We studied the role of hCdt1 protein in the duplication of the human genome by antibody microinjection experiments and analyzed its expression during the cell cycle in human non-transformed cells. We show that hCdt1 is essential for DNA replication in intact human cells, that it executes its function in a window of the cell cycle overlapping with pre-replicative complex formation and that it is necessary for the loading of minichromosome maintenance proteins onto chromatin. Intriguingly, we observed that hCdt1 protein, in contrast to other licensing factors, is already present in serum-deprived G0 arrested cells and its levels increase only marginally upon re-entry in the cell cycle.

TET1 Regulates DNA Replication through Targeting of Minichromosome Maintenance Genes

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2687-2687
Author(s):  
Hengyou Weng ◽  
Huilin Huang ◽  
Xi Qin ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Okwang Kwon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Fusion Partner ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Altered Expression

Abstract DNA cytosine methylation is one of the best-characterized epigenetic modifications that play important roles in diverse cellular and pathological processes. The mechanism underlying the dynamic regulation of the level and distribution of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) as well as the biological consequence of DNA methylation deregulation have been interesting research topics in recent years. TET1, first identified as a fusion partner of the histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4) methyltransferase MLL (mixed-lineage leukemia) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is the founding member of the Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) family of DNA hydroxylases which are capable of converting 5mC to 5hmC (5-hydroxymethylcytosine) and lead to gene activation. Our group has previously demonstrated that TET1 plays an oncogenic role in MLL-rearranged leukemia (Huang H, et al. PNAS 2013; 110(29):11994-9). The expression of the TET1 protein and the global level of its enzymatic product, 5hmC, are significantly up-regulated in MLL-rearranged leukemia, whereas the opposite has been reported in other cancers where TET1 functions as a tumor suppressor. Therefore, a global understanding of the targets of TET1 in MLL-rearranged leukemia would greatly help to understand the role of TET1 in this specific type of AML. To this end, we performed proteomics study in parallel with RNA-seq to systematically explore the functional targets of TET1 in a genome-wide and unbiased way. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based proteomic profiling showed that when Tet1 was knocked down in MLL-ENL-estrogen receptor inducible (ERtm) mouse myeloid leukemia cells, a total of 123 proteins were down-regulated whereas 191 were up-regulated with a fold-change cutoff of 1.2 (Fig. 1A and B), representing positively and negatively regulated targets of TET1, respectively. Most of the proteins with altered expression upon Tet1 knock-down showed a corresponding change at the mRNA level as reflected by the RNA-seq data. Interestingly, gene ontology (GO) analysis indicated enrichment on genes associated with DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Among these genes, the minichromosome maintenance complex genes, including MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, MCM6, and MCM7, showed significant downregulation when Tet1 expression was depleted. We further conducted chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays and demonstrated that TET1 binds directly to the CpG islands in the promoters of these MCM genes, suggesting that the regulation of the MCM genes by TET1 may occur at the transcriptional level. The six main minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM2-7) are recruited to DNA replication origins in early G1 phase of the cell cycle and constitute the core of the replicative DNA helicase. We showed that not only the total levels of the MCM2-7 proteins, but also their binding to chromatin (Fig. 1C), were decreased by shRNAs against TET1 in human leukemia cell lines. Examination on cell cycle distribution revealed a significant decrease in the S phase population upon TET1 knockdown (Fig. 1D), which could be phenocopied by silencing of individual MCM genes. Consistently, incorporation of 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) into newly synthesized DNA in the S phase can be inhibited by TET1 shRNAs (Fig. 1E), indicating the inhibition on DNA replication by TET1 silencing. Furthermore, DNA combing assays suggest that TET1 knockdown inhibits new origin firing (Fig. 1F) but does not influence replication fork speed. Collectively, our findings reveal a novel role of TET1 on regulating DNA replication in MLL-rearranged leukemia through targeting of MCM genes and highlight the therapeutic implication of targeting the TET1/MCM signaling. Figure 1 Role of TET1 in regulate DNA replication by controlling expression of MCM genes Figure 1. Role of TET1 in regulate DNA replication by controlling expression of MCM genes Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Deregulates Host Cellular Replication during Lytic Reactivation by Disrupting the MCM Complex through ORF59

2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Strahan ◽  
Prerna Dabral ◽  
Kammi Dingman ◽  
Christian Stadler ◽  
Kayla Hiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Viral Dna ◽  
Cellular Environment ◽  
Lytic Reactivation ◽  
Mcm Complex ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Cellular Replication ◽  
Cellular Dna

ABSTRACTMinichromosome maintenance proteins (MCMs) play an important role in DNA replication by binding to the origins as helicase and recruiting polymerases for DNA synthesis. During the S phase, MCM complex is loaded to limit DNA replication once per cell cycle. We identified MCMs as ORF59 binding partners in our protein pulldown assays, which led us to hypothesize that this interaction influences DNA replication. ORF59's interactions with MCMs were confirmed in both endogenous and overexpression systems, which showed its association with MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, and MCM6. Interestingly, MCM6 interacted with both the N- and C-terminal domains of ORF59, and its depletion in BCBL-1 and BC3 cells led to an increase in viral genome copies, viral late gene transcripts, and virion production compared to the control cells following reactivation. MCMs perform their function by loading onto the replication competent DNA, and one means of regulating chromatin loading/unloading, in addition to enzymatic activity of the MCM complex, is by posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation of these factors. Interestingly, a hypophosphorylated form of MCM3, which is associated with reduced loading onto the chromatin, was detected during lytic reactivation and correlated with its inability to associate with histones in reactivated cells. Additionally, chromatin immunoprecipitation showed lower levels of MCM3 and MCM4 association at cellular origins of replication and decreased levels of cellular DNA synthesis in cells undergoing reactivation. Taken together, these findings suggest a mechanism in which KSHV ORF59 disrupts the assembly and functions of MCM complex to stall cellular DNA replication and promote viral replication.IMPORTANCEKSHV is the causative agent of various lethal malignancies affecting immunocompromised individuals. Both lytic and latent phases of the viral life cycle contribute to the progression of these cancers. A better understanding of how viral proteins disrupt functions of a normal healthy cell to cause oncogenesis is warranted. One crucial lytic protein produced early during lytic reactivation is the multifunctional ORF59. In this report, we elucidated an important role of ORF59 in manipulating the cellular environment conducive for viral DNA replication by deregulating the normal functions of the host MCM proteins. ORF59 binds to specific MCMs and sequesters them away from replication origins in order to sabotage cellular DNA replication. Blocking cellular DNA replication ensures that cellular resources are utilized for transcription and replication of viral DNA.

Role of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation in expression of histone genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 614-621
Author(s):  
D E Lycan ◽  
M A Osley ◽  
L M Hereford
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Histone Genes ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Rna Levels

We analyzed the role of posttranscriptional mechanisms in the regulation of histone gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The rapid drop in histone RNA levels associated with the inhibition of ongoing DNA replication was postulated to be due to posttranscriptional degradation of histone transcripts. However, in analyzing the sequences required for this response, we showed that the coupling of histone RNA levels to DNA replication was due mostly, if not entirely, to transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, deletions which removed the negative, cell cycle control sequences from the histone promoter also uncoupled histone transcription from DNA replication. We propose that the arrest of DNA synthesis prematurely activates the regulatory pathway used in the normal cell cycle to repress transcription. Although posttranscriptional regulation did not appear to play a significant role in coupling histone RNA levels to DNA replication, it did affect the levels of histone RNA in the cell cycle. Posttranscriptional regulation could apparently restore much of the periodicity of histone RNA accumulation in cells which constitutively transcribed the histone genes. Unlike transcriptional regulation, periodic posttranscriptional regulation appears to operate on a clock which is independent of events in the mitotic DNA cycle. Posttranscriptional recognition of histone RNA must require either sequences in the 3' end of the RNA or an intact three-dimensional structure since H2A- and H2B-lacZ fusion transcripts, containing only 5' histone sequences, were insensitive to posttranscriptional controls.

Free, Conjugated and Bound Polyamines during the Ceil Cycle in Synchronized Cultures of Scenedesmus obliquus

1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 181-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiriakos Kotzabasis ◽  
Horst Senger
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Scenedesmus Obliquus ◽  
Photosynthetic Apparatus ◽  
Membrane Systems ◽  
Additional Peak ◽  
Unicellular Green Alga ◽  
Synchronized Cultures

The levels of free, conjugated and bound polyamines (PA) were analyzed during the cell cycle of the synchronized unicellular green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. The polyamines putrescine (PUT) and spermidine (SPD) in their free and conjugated forms accumulated per cell to a maximum in the cell cycle at about the 16 th hour after onset of illumination. The polyamines bound to macromolecules and membrane systems showed an additional peak around the 8-10 th hour of the cell cycle. The possible role of the different forms of polyamines in DNA replication, mitosis, cell division and development of the photosynthetic apparatus is discussed

scholarly journals Human Parvovirus B19 Infection Causes Cell Cycle Arrest of Human Erythroid Progenitors at Late S Phase That Favors Viral DNA Replication

2013 ◽  
Vol 87 (23) ◽  
pp. 12766-12775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Luo ◽  
Steve Kleiboeker ◽  
Xuefeng Deng ◽  
Jianming Qiu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Content ◽  
Parvovirus B19 ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Human Parvovirus B19 ◽  
Viral Dna ◽  
Viral Dna Replication ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cellular Dna

Human parvovirus B19 (B19V) infection has a unique tropism to human erythroid progenitor cells (EPCs) in human bone marrow and the fetal liver. It has been reported that both B19V infection and expression of the large nonstructural protein NS1 arrested EPCs at a cell cycle status with a 4 N DNA content, which was previously claimed to be “G2/M arrest.” However, a B19V mutant infectious DNA (M20mTAD2) replicated well in B19V-semipermissive UT7/Epo-S1 cells but did not induce G2/M arrest (S. Lou, Y. Luo, F. Cheng, Q. Huang, W. Shen, S. Kleiboeker, J. F. Tisdale, Z. Liu, and J. Qiu, J. Virol.86:10748–10758, 2012). To further characterize cell cycle arrest during B19V infection of EPCs, we analyzed the cell cycle change using 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse-labeling and DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining, which precisely establishes the cell cycle pattern based on both cellular DNA replication and nuclear DNA content. We found that although both B19V NS1 transduction and infection immediately arrested cells at a status of 4 N DNA content, B19V-infected 4 N cells still incorporated BrdU, indicating active DNA synthesis. Notably, the BrdU incorporation was caused neither by viral DNA replication nor by cellular DNA repair that could be initiated by B19V infection-induced cellular DNA damage. Moreover, several S phase regulators were abundantly expressed and colocalized within the B19V replication centers. More importantly, replication of the B19V wild-type infectious DNA, as well as the M20mTAD2mutant, arrested cells at S phase. Taken together, our results confirmed that B19V infection triggers late S phase arrest, which presumably provides cellular S phase factors for viral DNA replication.

scholarly journals Cellular DNA Ligase I Is Recruited to Cytoplasmic Vaccinia Virus Factories and Masks the Role of the Vaccinia Ligase in Viral DNA Replication

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 563-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nir Paran ◽  
Frank S. De Silva ◽  
Tatiana G. Senkevich ◽  
Bernard Moss
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Vaccinia Virus ◽  
Dna Ligase ◽  
Viral Dna ◽  
Viral Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Ligase I ◽  
Cellular Dna

Mechanisms restricting DNA replication to once per cell cycle: the role of Cdc6p and ORC

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Romanowski ◽  
Mark A. Madine
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication

scholarly journals Identification of an Arginine-Rich Motif in Human Papillomavirus Type 1 E1^E4 Protein Necessary for E4-Mediated Inhibition of Cellular DNA Synthesis In Vitro and in Cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (18) ◽  
pp. 9056-9064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Roberts ◽  
Sarah R. Kingsbury ◽  
Kai Stoeber ◽  
Gillian L. Knight ◽  
Phillip H. Gallimore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Human Papillomaviruses ◽  
Soluble Form ◽  
Cellular Dna ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACT Productive infections by human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are restricted to nondividing, differentiated keratinocytes. HPV early proteins E6 and E7 deregulate cell cycle progression and activate the host cell DNA replication machinery in these cells, changes essential for virus synthesis. Productive virus replication is accompanied by abundant expression of the HPV E4 protein. Expression of HPV1 E4 in cells is known to activate cell cycle checkpoints, inhibiting G2-to-M transition of the cell cycle and also suppressing entry of cells into S phase. We report here that the HPV1 E4 protein, in the presence of a soluble form of the replication-licensing factor (RLF) Cdc6, inhibits initiation of cellular DNA replication in a mammalian cell-free DNA replication system. Chromatin-binding studies show that E4 blocks replication initiation in vitro by preventing loading of the RLFs Mcm2 and Mcm7 onto chromatin. HPV1 E4-mediated replication inhibition in vitro and suppression of entry of HPV1 E4-expressing cells into S phase are both abrogated upon alanine replacement of arginine 45 in the full-length E4 protein (E1^E4), implying that these two HPV1 E4 functions are linked. We hypothesize that HPV1 E4 inhibits competing host cell DNA synthesis in replication-activated suprabasal keratinocytes by suppressing licensing of cellular replication origins, thus modifying the phenotype of the infected cell in favor of viral genome amplification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document