scholarly journals Break-Induced Loss of Heterozygosity in Fission Yeast: Dual Roles for Homologous Recombination in Promoting Translocations and Preventing De Novo Telomere Addition

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 7745-7757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason K. Cullen ◽  
Sharon P. Hussey ◽  
Carol Walker ◽  
John Prudden ◽  
Boon-Yu Wee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Loss Of Heterozygosity ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dual Roles ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Break Site ◽  
Break Induced Replication ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Causal Event

ABSTRACT Loss of heterozygosity (LOH), a causal event in tumorigenesis, frequently encompasses multiple genetic loci and whole chromosome arms. However, the mechanisms leading to such extensive LOH are poorly understood. We investigated the mechanisms of DNA double-strand break (DSB)-induced extensive LOH by screening for auxotrophic marker loss ∼25 kb distal to an HO endonuclease break site within a nonessential minichromosome in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Extensive break-induced LOH was infrequent, resulting from large translocations through both allelic crossovers and break-induced replication. These events required the homologous recombination (HR) genes rad32 +, rad50 +, nbs1 +, rhp51 +, rad22 +, rhp55 +, rhp54 +, and mus81 +. Surprisingly, LOH was still observed in HR mutants, which resulted predominantly from de novo telomere addition at the break site. De novo telomere addition was most frequently observed in rad22Δ and rhp55Δ backgrounds, which disrupt HR following end resection. Further, levels of de novo telomere addition, while increased in ku70Δ rhp55Δ strains, were reduced in exo1Δ rhp55Δ and an rhp55Δ strain overexpressing rhp51. These findings support a model in which HR prevents de novo telomere addition at DSBs by competing for resected ends. Together, these results suggest that the mechanisms of break-induced LOH may be predicted from the functional status of the HR machinery.

scholarly journals Human SIRT6 Promotes DNA End Resection Through CtIP Deacetylation

Science ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 329 (5997) ◽  
pp. 1348-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abderrahmane Kaidi ◽  
Brian T. Weinert ◽  
Chunaram Choudhary ◽  
Stephen P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Lysine Deacetylases ◽  
End Resection

SIRT6 belongs to the sirtuin family of protein lysine deacetylases, which regulate aging and genome stability. We found that human SIRT6 has a role in promoting DNA end resection, a crucial step in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination. SIRT6 depletion impaired the accumulation of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA at DNA damage sites, reduced rates of homologous recombination, and sensitized cells to DSB-inducing agents. We identified the DSB resection protein CtIP [C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) interacting protein] as a SIRT6 interaction partner and showed that SIRT6-dependent CtIP deacetylation promotes resection. A nonacetylatable CtIP mutant alleviated the effect of SIRT6 depletion on resection, thus identifying CtIP as a key substrate by which SIRT6 facilitates DSB processing and homologous recombination. These findings further clarify how SIRT6 promotes genome stability.

scholarly journals End resection: a key step in homologous recombination and DNA double-strand break repair

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sijie Liu ◽  
Daochun Kong
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
General Process ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Biochemical Mechanisms ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
End Resection ◽  
Made In

AbstractDNA end resection in eukaryotes is a key step in DNA homologous recombination (HR) and HR-mediated DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, in which DNA2, EXO1 and MRE11 endo- and exonucleases remove several kilobases from the 5′ terminus of the DNA with DSB, while the 3′ terminus remains intact. The end resection-generated 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang is then coated by RAD51 for subsequent strand invasion. In the last two decades, great progress has been made in understanding the biochemical mechanisms of end resection, including the identification of various enzymes involved in this process. However, some important questions about this process remain to be resolved. In this review, we summarize the general process of end resection and discuss the implications of the most recent findings for understanding of the end resection machinery.

scholarly journals Pre-Exposure to Ionizing Radiation Stimulates DNA Double Strand Break End Resection, Promoting the Use of Homologous Recombination Repair

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0122582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nakako Izumi Nakajima ◽  
Yoshihiko Hagiwara ◽  
Takahiro Oike ◽  
Ryuichi Okayasu ◽  
Takeshi Murakami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
End Resection

scholarly journals LIN37-DREAM prevents DNA end resection and homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks in quiescent cells

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo-Ruei Chen ◽  
Yinan Wang ◽  
Anthony Tubbs ◽  
Dali Zong ◽  
Faith C Fowler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Quiescent Cells ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Brca1 Brca2 ◽  
End Resection

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR) is thought to be restricted to the S- and G2- phases of the cell cycle in part due to 53BP1 antagonizing DNA end resection in G1-phase and non-cycling quiescent (G0) cells. Here, we show that LIN37, a component of the DREAM transcriptional repressor, functions in a 53BP1-independent manner to prevent DNA end resection and HR in G0 cells. Loss of LIN37 leads to the expression of HR proteins, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and RAD51, and promotes DNA end resection in G0 cells even in the presence of 53BP1. In contrast to 53BP1-deficiency, DNA end resection in LIN37-deficient G0 cells depends on BRCA1 and leads to RAD51 filament formation and HR. LIN37 is not required to protect DNA ends in cycling cells at G1-phase. Thus, LIN37 regulates a novel 53BP1-independent cell phase-specific DNA end protection pathway that functions uniquely in quiescent cells.

scholarly journals ATRX and RECQ5 define distinct homologous recombination subpathways

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. e2010370118
Author(s):  
Amira Elbakry ◽  
Szilvia Juhász ◽  
Ki Choi Chan ◽  
Markus Löbrich
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Sister Chromatid Exchanges ◽  
Holliday Junctions ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Sequence Information ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Break Site ◽  
Strand Annealing

Homologous recombination (HR) is an important DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway that copies sequence information lost at the break site from an undamaged homologous template. This involves the formation of a recombination structure that is processed to restore the original sequence but also harbors the potential for crossover (CO) formation between the participating molecules. Synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) is an HR subpathway that prevents CO formation and is thought to predominate in mammalian cells. The chromatin remodeler ATRX promotes an alternative HR subpathway that has the potential to form COs. Here, we show that ATRX-dependent HR outcompetes RECQ5-dependent SDSA for the repair of most two-ended DSBs in human cells and leads to the frequent formation of COs, assessed by measuring sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs). We provide evidence that subpathway choice is dependent on interaction of both ATRX and RECQ5 with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. We also show that the subpathway usage varies among different cancer cell lines and compare it to untransformed cells. We further observe HR intermediates arising as ionizing radiation (IR)-induced ultra-fine bridges only in cells expressing ATRX and lacking MUS81 and GEN1. Consistently, damage-induced MUS81 recruitment is only observed in ATRX-expressing cells. Cells lacking BLM show similar MUS81 recruitment and IR-induced SCE formation as control cells. Collectively, these results suggest that the ATRX pathway involves the formation of HR intermediates whose processing is entirely dependent on MUS81 and GEN1 and independent of BLM. We propose that the predominant ATRX-dependent HR subpathway forms joint molecules distinct from classical Holliday junctions.

scholarly journals LIN37-DREAM Prevents DNA End Resection and Homologous Recombination at DNA Double Strand Breaks in Quiescent Cells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo-Ruei Chen ◽  
Yinan Wang ◽  
Anthony Tubbs ◽  
Dali Zong ◽  
Faith Fowler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Quiescent Cells ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
Brca1 Brca2 ◽  
End Resection

DNA double strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination (HR) is thought to be restricted to the S- and G2- phases of the cell cycle in part due to 53BP1 antagonizing DNA end resection in G1-phase and non-cycling quiescent (G0) cells. Here, we show that LIN37, a component of the DREAM transcriptional repressor, functions in a 53BP1-independent manner to prevent DNA end resection and HR in G0 cells. Loss of LIN37 leads to expression of HR proteins, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and RAD51, and DNA end resection in G0 cells even in the presence of 53BP1. In contrast to 53BP1-deficiency, DNA end resection in LIN37-deficient G0 cells depends on BRCA1 and leads to RAD51 filament formation and HR. LIN37 is not required to protect DNA ends in cycling cells at G1-phase. Thus, LIN37 regulates a novel 53BP1-independent cell phase-specific DNA end protection pathway that functions uniquely in quiescent cells.

scholarly journals Formation of Large Palindromic DNA by Homologous Recombination of Short Inverted Repeat Sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 1065-1075
Author(s):  
David K Butler ◽  
David Gillespie ◽  
Brandi Steele
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Inverted Repeat ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Repeat Sequence ◽  
Inverted Repeat Sequence ◽  
Repeat Sequences ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Intermolecular Reaction

Abstract Large DNA palindromes form sporadically in many eukaryotic and prokaryotic genomes and are often associated with amplified genes. The presence of a short inverted repeat sequence near a DNA double-strand break has been implicated in the formation of large palindromes in a variety of organisms. Previously we have established that in Saccharomyces cerevisae a linear DNA palindrome is efficiently formed from a single-copy circular plasmid when a DNA double-strand break is introduced next to a short inverted repeat sequence. In this study we address whether the linear palindromes form by an intermolecular reaction (that is, a reaction between two identical fragments in a head-to-head arrangement) or by an unusual intramolecular reaction, as it apparently does in other examples of palindrome formation. Our evidence supports a model in which palindromes are primarily formed by an intermolecular reaction involving homologous recombination of short inverted repeat sequences. We have also extended our investigation into the requirement for DNA double-strand break repair genes in palindrome formation. We have found that a deletion of the RAD52 gene significantly reduces palindrome formation by intermolecular recombination and that deletions of two other genes in the RAD52-epistasis group (RAD51 and MRE11) have little or no effect on palindrome formation. In addition, palindrome formation is dramatically reduced by a deletion of the nucleotide excision repair gene RAD1.

scholarly journals Repairing a double–strand chromosome break by homologous recombination: revisiting Robin Holliday's model

2004 ◽  
Vol 359 (1441) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Haber ◽  
Gregorz Ira ◽  
Anna Malkova ◽  
Neal Sugawara
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Holliday Junctions ◽  
Chromosome Break ◽  
Invasion Mechanism ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Induced Replication ◽  
Mutant Cells

Since the pioneering model for homologous recombination proposed by Robin Holliday in 1964, there has been great progress in understanding how recombination occurs at a molecular level. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , one can follow recombination by physically monitoring DNA after the synchronous induction of a double–strand break (DSB) in both wild–type and mutant cells. A particularly well–studied system has been the switching of yeast mating–type ( MAT ) genes, where a DSB can be induced synchronously by expression of the site–specific HO endonuclease. Similar studies can be performed in meiotic cells, where DSBs are created by the Spo11 nuclease. There appear to be at least two competing mechanisms of homologous recombination: a synthesis–dependent strand annealing pathway leading to noncrossovers and a two–end strand invasion mechanism leading to formation and resolution of Holliday junctions (HJs), leading to crossovers. The establishment of a modified replication fork during DSB repair links gene conversion to another important repair process, break–induced replication. Despite recent revelations, almost 40 years after Holliday's model was published, the essential ideas he proposed of strand invasion and heteroduplex DNA formation, the formation and resolution of HJs, and mismatch repair, remain the basis of our thinking.

scholarly journals RAD6 Promotes Homologous Recombination Repair by Activating the Autophagy-Mediated Degradation of Heterochromatin Protein HP1

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Chen ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
Luxi Sun ◽  
Da-Liang Wang ◽  
Lu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Open Chromatin ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Heterochromatin Protein ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme

Efficient DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is critical for the maintenance of genome stability. Unrepaired or misrepaired DSBs cause chromosomal rearrangements that can result in severe consequences, such as tumorigenesis. RAD6 is an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme that plays a pivotal role in repairing UV-induced DNA damage. Here, we present evidence that RAD6 is also required for DNA DSB repair via homologous recombination (HR) by specifically regulating the degradation of heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α). Our study indicates that RAD6 physically interacts with HP1α and ubiquitinates HP1α at residue K154, thereby promoting HP1α degradation through the autophagy pathway and eventually leading to an open chromatin structure that facilitates efficient HR DSB repair. Furthermore, bioinformatics studies have indicated that the expression of RAD6 and HP1α exhibits an inverse relationship and correlates with the survival rate of patients.

scholarly journals End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Blackwood ◽  
Neil J. Rzechorzek ◽  
Sian M. Bray ◽  
Joseph D. Maman ◽  
Luca Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
End Resection

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5′–3′ end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document