scholarly journals Spatiotemporal Cascade of Transcription Factor Binding Required for Promoter Activation

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 688-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Yarrington ◽  
Jared S. Rudd ◽  
David J. Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Regulatory Sequence ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Multiple Binding Sites ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
The Right

Promoters often contain multiple binding sites for a single factor. The yeastHOgene contains nine highly conserved binding sites for the SCB (Swi4/6-dependent cell cycle box) binding factor (SBF) complex (composed of Swi4 and Swi6) in the 700-bp upstream regulatory sequence 2 (URS2) promoter region. Here, we show that the distal and proximal SBF sites in URS2 function differently. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments show that SBF binds preferentially to the left side of URS2 (URS2-L), despite equivalent binding to the left-half and right-half SBF sitesin vitro. SBF binding at URS2-L sites depends on prior chromatin remodeling events at the upstream URS1 region. These signals from URS1 influence chromatin changes at URS2 but only at sites within a defined distance. SBF bound at URS2-L, however, is unable to activate transcription but instead facilitates SBF binding to sites in the right half (URS2-R), which are required for transcriptional activation. Factor binding atHO, therefore, follows a temporal cascade, with SBF bound at URS2-L serving to relay a signal from URS1 to the SBF sites in URS2-R that ultimately activate gene expression. Taken together, we describe a novel property of a transcription factor that can have two distinct roles in gene activation, depending on its location within a promoter.

scholarly journals Systematic analysis of low-affinity transcription factor binding site clusters in vitro and in vivo establishes their functional relevance

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Shahein ◽  
Maria L&oacutepez-Malo ◽  
Ivan Istomin ◽  
Evan J. Olson ◽  
Shiyu Cheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Functional Relevance

Transcription factor binding to a single binding site and its functional consequence in a promoter context are beginning to be relatively well understood. However, binding to clusters of sites has yet to be characterized in depth, and the functional relevance of binding site clusters remains uncertain.We employed a high-throughput biochemical method to characterize transcription factor binding to clusters varying across a range of affinities and configurations. We found that transcription factors can bind concurrently to overlapping sites, challenging the notion of binding exclusivity. Further-more, compared to an individual high-affinity binding site, small clusters with binding sites an order of magnitude lower in affinity give rise to higher mean occupancies at physiologically-relevant transcription factor concentrations in vitro. To assess whether the observed in vitro occupancies translate to transcriptional activation in vivo, we tested low-affinity binding site clusters by inserting them into a synthetic minimal CYC1 and the native PHO5 S. cerevisiae promoter. In the minCYC1 promoter, clusters of low-affinity binding sites can generate transcriptional output comparable to a promoter containing three consensus binding sites. In the PHO5 promoter, replacing the native Pho4 binding sites with clusters of low-affinity binding sites recovered activation of these promoters as well. This systematic characterization demonstrates that clusters of low-affinity binding sites achieve substantial occupancies, and that this occupancy can drive expression in eukaryotic promoters

scholarly journals Enhancers with cooperative Notch binding sites are more resistant to regulation by the Hairless co-repressor

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. e1009039
Author(s):  
Yi Kuang ◽  
Anna Pyo ◽  
Natanel Eafergan ◽  
Brittany Cain ◽  
Lisa M. Gutzwiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Notch Intracellular Domain ◽  
Repressor Complex ◽  
Notch Activation

Notch signaling controls many developmental processes by regulating gene expression. Notch-dependent enhancers recruit activation complexes consisting of the Notch intracellular domain, the Cbf/Su(H)/Lag1 (CSL) transcription factor (TF), and the Mastermind co-factor via two types of DNA sites: monomeric CSL sites and cooperative dimer sites called Su(H) paired sites (SPS). Intriguingly, the CSL TF can also bind co-repressors to negatively regulate transcription via these same sites. Here, we tested how synthetic enhancers with monomeric CSL sites versus dimeric SPSs bind Drosophila Su(H) complexes in vitro and mediate transcriptional outcomes in vivo. Our findings reveal that while the Su(H)/Hairless co-repressor complex similarly binds SPS and CSL sites in an additive manner, the Notch activation complex binds SPSs, but not CSL sites, in a cooperative manner. Moreover, transgenic reporters with SPSs mediate stronger, more consistent transcription and are more resistant to increased Hairless co-repressor expression compared to reporters with the same number of CSL sites. These findings support a model in which SPS containing enhancers preferentially recruit cooperative Notch activation complexes over Hairless repression complexes to ensure consistent target gene activation.

scholarly journals TFBSshape: an expanded motif database for DNA shape features of transcription factor binding sites

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsu-Pei Chiu ◽  
Beibei Xin ◽  
Nicholas Markarian ◽  
Yingfei Wang ◽  
Remo Rohs
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding Sites ◽  
Shape Features ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Methylated Dna ◽  
Dna Shape ◽  
Motif Database

AbstractTFBSshape (https://tfbsshape.usc.edu) is a motif database for analyzing structural profiles of transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). The main rationale for this database is to be able to derive mechanistic insights in protein–DNA readout modes from sequencing data without available structures. We extended the quantity and dimensionality of TFBSshape, from mostly in vitro to in vivo binding and from unmethylated to methylated DNA. This new release of TFBSshape improves its functionality and launches a responsive and user-friendly web interface for easy access to the data. The current expansion includes new entries from the most recent collections of transcription factors (TFs) from the JASPAR and UniPROBE databases, methylated TFBSs derived from in vitro high-throughput EpiSELEX-seq binding assays and in vivo methylated TFBSs from the MeDReaders database. TFBSshape content has increased to 2428 structural profiles for 1900 TFs from 39 different species. The structural profiles for each TFBS entry now include 13 shape features and minor groove electrostatic potential for standard DNA and four shape features for methylated DNA. We improved the flexibility and accuracy for the shape-based alignment of TFBSs and designed new tools to compare methylated and unmethylated structural profiles of TFs and methods to derive DNA shape-preserving nucleotide mutations in TFBSs.

scholarly journals Chromatin Remodeling Mediated by Drosophila GAGA Factor and ISWI Activates fushi tarazu Gene Transcription In Vitro

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2455-2461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Okada ◽  
Susumu Hirose
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Promoter Region ◽  
Gaga Factor ◽  
Fushi Tarazu ◽  
Nucleosome Remodeling ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Chromatin Template

ABSTRACT GAGA factor is known to remodel the chromatin structure in concert with nucleosome-remodeling factor NURF in a Drosophilaembryonic S150 extract. The promoter region of the Drosophila fushi tarazu (ftz) gene carries several binding sites for GAGA factor. Both the GAGA factor-binding sites and GAGA factor per se are necessary for the proper expression of ftz in vivo. We observed transcriptional activation of the ftz gene when a preassembled chromatin template was incubated with GAGA factor and the S150 extract. The chromatin structure within the ftzpromoter was specifically disrupted by incubation of the preassembled chromatin with GAGA factor and the S150 extract. Both transcriptional activation and chromatin disruption were blocked by an antiserum raised against ISWI or by base substitutions in the GAGA factor-binding sites in the ftz promoter region. These results demonstrate that GAGA factor- and ISWI-mediated disruption of the chromatin structure within the promoter region of ftz activates transcription on the chromatin template.

scholarly journals Measuring Transcription Factor Binding and Gene Expression using Barcoded Self-Reporting Transposon Calling Cards and Transcriptomes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Lalli ◽  
Fengping Dong ◽  
Xuhua Chen ◽  
Jeffrey Milbrandt ◽  
Joseph Dougherty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Dna Barcode ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Factor Binding

AbstractCalling cards technology using self-reporting transposons enables the identification of DNA-protein interactions through RNA sequencing. By introducing a DNA barcode into the calling card itself, we have drastically reduced the cost and labor requirements of calling card experiments in bulk populations of cells. An additional barcode incorporation during reverse transcription enables simultaneous transcriptome measurement in a facile and affordable protocol. We demonstrate that barcoded self-reporting transposons recover in vitro binding sites for four basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors with important roles in cell fate specification: ASCL1, MYOD1, NEUROD2, and NGN1. Further, simultaneous calling cards and transcriptional profiling during transcription factor overexpression identified both binding sites and gene expression changes for two of these factors. RNA-based identification of transcription factor binding sites and gene expression through barcoded self-reporting transposon calling cards and transcriptomes is a novel and powerful method to infer gene regulatory networks in a population of cells.

scholarly journals Global properties of regulatory sequences are predicted by transcription factor recognition mechanisms

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zain M. Patel ◽  
Timothy R. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Regulatory Sequence ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Global Properties ◽  
Regulatory Sites

Abstract Background Mammalian genomes contain millions of putative regulatory sequences, which are delineated by binding of multiple transcription factors. The degree to which spacing and orientation constraints among transcription factor binding sites contribute to the recognition and identity of regulatory sequence is an unresolved but important question that impacts our understanding of genome function and evolution. Global mechanisms that underlie phenomena including the size of regulatory sequences, their uniqueness, and their evolutionary turnover remain poorly described. Results Here, we ask whether models incorporating different degrees of spacing and orientation constraints among transcription factor binding sites are broadly consistent with several global properties of regulatory sequence. These properties include length, sequence diversity, turnover rate, and dominance of specific TFs in regulatory site identity and cell type specification. Models with and without spacing and orientation constraints are generally consistent with all observed properties of regulatory sequence, and with regulatory sequences being fundamentally small (~ 1 nucleosome). Uniqueness of regulatory regions and their rapid evolutionary turnover are expected under all models examined. An intriguing issue we identify is that the complexity of eukaryotic regulatory sites must scale with the number of active transcription factors, in order to accomplish observed specificity. Conclusions Models of transcription factor binding with or without spacing and orientation constraints predict that regulatory sequences should be fundamentally short, unique, and turn over rapidly. We posit that the existence of master regulators may be, in part, a consequence of evolutionary pressure to limit the complexity and increase evolvability of regulatory sites.

scholarly journals Enhancers with cooperative Notch binding sites are more resistant to regulation by the Hairless co-repressor

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Kuang ◽  
Anna Pyo ◽  
Natanel Eafergan ◽  
Brittany Cain ◽  
Lisa M. Gutzwiller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Notch Intracellular Domain ◽  
Repressor Complex ◽  
Notch Activation

AbstractNotch signaling controls many developmental processes by regulating gene expression. Notch-dependent enhancers recruit activation complexes consisting of the Notch intracellular domain, the Cbf/Su(H)/Lag1 (CSL) transcription factor (TF), and the Mastermind co-factor via two types of DNA sites: monomeric CSL sites and cooperative dimer sites called Su(H) paired sites (SPS). Intriguingly, the CSL TF can also bind co-repressors to negatively regulate transcription via these same sites. Here, we tested how enhancers with monomeric CSL sites versus dimeric SPSs bind Drosophila Su(H) complexes in vitro and mediate transcriptional outcomes in vivo. Our findings reveal that while the Su(H)/Hairless co-repressor complex similarly binds SPS and CSL sites in an additive manner, the Notch activation complex binds SPSs, but not CSL sites, in a cooperative manner. Moreover, transgenic reporters with SPSs mediate stronger, more consistent transcription and are more resistant to increased Hairless co-repressor expression compared to reporters with the same number of CSL sites. These findings support a model in which SPS containing enhancers preferentially recruit cooperative Notch activation complexes over Hairless repression complexes to ensure consistent target gene activation.

scholarly journals Chromatin-dependent Transcription Factor Accessibility Rather than Nucleosome Remodeling Predominates during Global Transcriptional Restructuring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 3503-3513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl A. Zawadzki ◽  
Alexandre V. Morozov ◽  
James R. Broach
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding Sites ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Regulation Of Expression ◽  
Nucleosome Remodeling ◽  
Glucose Addition ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Yeast Genes

Several well-studied promoters in yeast lose nucleosomes upon transcriptional activation and gain them upon repression, an observation that has prompted the model that transcriptional activation and repression requires nucleosome remodeling of regulated promoters. We have examined global nucleosome positioning before and after glucose-induced transcriptional reprogramming, a condition under which more than half of all yeast genes significantly change expression. The majority of induced and repressed genes exhibit no change in promoter nucleosome arrangement, although promoters that do undergo nucleosome remodeling tend to contain a TATA box. Rather, we found multiple examples where the pre-existing accessibility of putative transcription factor binding sites before glucose addition determined whether the corresponding gene would change expression in response to glucose addition. These results suggest that selection of appropriate transcription factor binding sites may be dictated to a large extent by nucleosome prepositioning but that regulation of expression through these sites is dictated not by nucleosome repositioning but by changes in transcription factor activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document