scholarly journals Template Structural Requirements for Transcription In Vivo by RNA Polymerase II

1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 1595-1607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Miller ◽  
Janet E. Mertz
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Structural Requirements ◽  
Infected Monkey ◽  
Full Complement ◽  
Sv40 Dna

Purified simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA is reconstituted into chromatin and transcribed by endogenous RNA polymerase II when microinjected into nuclei ofXenopus laevisoocytes. We have correlated the kinetics of chromatin reconstitution with that of accumulation of virus-specific RNA in this system. A delay of approximately 3 h was found in the appearance of appreciable numbers of both fully supercoiled molecules and transcriptionally active templates. SV40 minichromosomes, isolated from virus-infected monkey cells with 0.2 M NaCl, also exhibited this lag in onset of transcriptional activity when microinjected into oocytes. These findings indicate that neither purified SV40 DNA nor SV40 DNA containing a full complement of nucleosomes can function as a template for transcription in vivo before association with appropriate cellular nonhistone chromosomal factors has taken place. In addition, the gradual degradation of linear SV40 DNA in oocytes was not sufficient to account for the fact that it was much less transcriptionally active than circular SV40 DNA. Taken together, these results indicate that the conformational state of the DNA can affect its ability to function as a template for transcription in vivo by RNA polymerase II. In contrast, transcription by RNA polymerase III of purified, circularized cloned DNAs encoding genes for 5S rRNA was detectable long before the injected DNAs had time to reconstitute into chromatin. Therefore, the template structural requirements for transcription in vivo by RNA polymerases II and III are different.

Template Structural Requirements for Transcription In Vivo by RNA Polymerase II

1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 1595-1607
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Miller ◽  
Janet E. Mertz
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Structural Requirements ◽  
Infected Monkey ◽  
Full Complement ◽  
Sv40 Dna

Purified simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA is reconstituted into chromatin and transcribed by endogenous RNA polymerase II when microinjected into nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. We have correlated the kinetics of chromatin reconstitution with that of accumulation of virus-specific RNA in this system. A delay of approximately 3 h was found in the appearance of appreciable numbers of both fully supercoiled molecules and transcriptionally active templates. SV40 minichromosomes, isolated from virus-infected monkey cells with 0.2 M NaCl, also exhibited this lag in onset of transcriptional activity when microinjected into oocytes. These findings indicate that neither purified SV40 DNA nor SV40 DNA containing a full complement of nucleosomes can function as a template for transcription in vivo before association with appropriate cellular nonhistone chromosomal factors has taken place. In addition, the gradual degradation of linear SV40 DNA in oocytes was not sufficient to account for the fact that it was much less transcriptionally active than circular SV40 DNA. Taken together, these results indicate that the conformational state of the DNA can affect its ability to function as a template for transcription in vivo by RNA polymerase II. In contrast, transcription by RNA polymerase III of purified, circularized cloned DNAs encoding genes for 5S rRNA was detectable long before the injected DNAs had time to reconstitute into chromatin. Therefore, the template structural requirements for transcription in vivo by RNA polymerases II and III are different.

scholarly journals Simian virus 40 major late promoter: a novel tripartite structure that includes intragenic sequences.

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 2021-2033 ◽  
Author(s):  
D E Ayer ◽  
W S Dynan
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Transcription Unit ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Base Pairs

Unlike most genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II, the simian virus 40 late transcription unit does not have a TATA box. To determine what sequences are required for initiation at the major late mRNA cap site of simian virus 40, clustered point mutations were constructed and tested for transcriptional activity in vitro and in vivo. Three promoter elements were defined. The first is centered 31 base pairs upstream of the cap site in a position normally reserved for a TATA box. The second is at the cap site. The third occupies a novel position centered 28 base pairs downstream of the cap site within a protein-coding sequence. The ability of RNA polymerase II to recognize this promoter suggests that there is greater variation in promoter architecture than had been believed previously.

Simian virus 40 major late promoter: a novel tripartite structure that includes intragenic sequences

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 2021-2033
Author(s):  
D E Ayer ◽  
W S Dynan
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Transcription Unit ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Base Pairs

Unlike most genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II, the simian virus 40 late transcription unit does not have a TATA box. To determine what sequences are required for initiation at the major late mRNA cap site of simian virus 40, clustered point mutations were constructed and tested for transcriptional activity in vitro and in vivo. Three promoter elements were defined. The first is centered 31 base pairs upstream of the cap site in a position normally reserved for a TATA box. The second is at the cap site. The third occupies a novel position centered 28 base pairs downstream of the cap site within a protein-coding sequence. The ability of RNA polymerase II to recognize this promoter suggests that there is greater variation in promoter architecture than had been believed previously.

Replication of cloned DNA containing the Alu family sequence during cell extract-promoting simian virus 40 DNA synthesis

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1476-1482
Author(s):  
H Ariga
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Cell Extract ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
T Antigen ◽  
Sv40 T Antigen ◽  
Sv40 Dna

The replicating activity of several cloned DNAs containing putative origin sequences was examined in a cell-free extract that absolutely depends on simian virus 40 (SV40) T antigen promoting initiation of SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Of the three DNAs containing the human Alu family sequence (BLUR8), the origin of (Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid 2 micron DNA (pJD29), and the yeast autonomous replicating sequence (YRp7), only BLUR8 was active as a template. Replication in a reaction mixture with BLUR8 as a template was semiconservative and not primed by a putative RNA polymerase III transcript synthesized on the Alu family sequence in vitro. Pulse-chase experiments showed that the small-sized DNA produced in a short-term incubation was converted to full-length closed circular and open circular DNAs in alkaline sucrose gradients. DNA synthesis in extracts began in a region of the Alu family sequence and was inhibited 80% by the addition of anti-T serum. Furthermore, partially purified T antigen bound the Alu family sequence in BLUR8 by the DNA-binding immunoassay. These results suggest that SV40 T antigen recognizes the Alu family sequence, similar to the origin sequence of SV40 DNA, and initiates semiconservative DNA replication in vitro.

scholarly journals Regulation of simian virus 40 gene expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 2019-2028 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Michaeli ◽  
C Prives
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
T Antigen ◽  
Oocyte Nucleus ◽  
Xenopus Laevis Oocytes ◽  
Large T Antigen ◽  
Viral Dna ◽  
Infected Monkey ◽  
Sv40 Dna

Expression of the simian virus 40 (SV40) early and late regions was examined in Xenopus laevis oocytes microinjected with viral DNA. In contrast to the situation in monkey cells, both late-strand-specific (L-strand) RNA and early-strand-specific (E-strand) RNA could be detected as early as 2 h after injection. At all time points tested thereafter, L-strand RNA was synthesized in excess over E-strand RNA. Significantly greater quantities of L-strand, relative to E-strand, RNA were detected over a 100-fold range of DNA concentrations injected. Analysis of the subcellular distribution of [35S]methionine-labeled viral proteins revealed that while the majority of the VP-1 and all detectable small t antigen were found in the oocyte cytoplasm, most of the large T antigen was located in the oocyte nucleus. The presence of the large T antigen in the nucleus led us to investigate whether this viral product influences the relative synthesis of late or early RNA in the oocyte as it does in infected monkey cells. Microinjection of either mutant C6 SV40 DNA, which encodes a large T antigen unable to bind specifically to viral regulatory sequences, or deleted viral DNA lacking part of the large T antigen coding sequences yielded ratios of L-strand to E-strand RNA that were similar to those observed with wild-type SV40 DNA. Taken together, these observations suggest that the regulation of SV40 RNA synthesis in X. laevis oocytes occurs by a fundamentally different mechanism than that observed in infected monkey cells. This notion was further supported by the observation that the major 5' ends of L-strand RNA synthesized in oocytes were different from those detected in infected cells. Furthermore, only a subset of those L-strand RNAs were polyadenylated.

DNA topoisomerase activity associated with simian virus 40 nucleoprotein complexes

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Hamelin ◽  
Benoit D'Amours ◽  
Christian Page ◽  
Young Sup Chung
Keyword(s):  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Dna Topoisomerase ◽  
Infected Monkey ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Catalytically Active ◽  
Nucleoprotein Complexes ◽  
Sv40 Dna

Simian virus 40 (SV40) chromatin extracted from nuclei of infected monkey cells (CV1) was sedimented in neutral sucrose gradients, before and after digestion with bovine pancreatic RNase I-A or DNase I. DNA topoisomerase (TI) activity was found associated with RNase-resistant, DNase-sensitive SV40 nucleoprotein complexes. After polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, a number of proteins with a molecular mass between 40 and 70 kDa were seen at the level of viral DNA peaks, some of which may represent catalytically active breakdown products of the TI enzyme. Large protein complexes were observed under the electron microscope in association with the viral chromosomes and appear to correspond to the SV40 DNA replication complex, including TI. Our results suggest that TI activity is indeed associated with the viral minichromosomes undergoing replication in vivo.Key words: deoxyribonucleoproteins, DNA topoisomerase, minichromosomes, ribonucleoproteins, simian virus 40, viral chromatin.

scholarly journals Transcription of hepatitis B virus by RNA polymerase II.

1983 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 1766-1773 ◽  
Author(s):  
L B Rall ◽  
D N Standring ◽  
O Laub ◽  
W J Rutter
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Virus Genome ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Free System ◽  
B Virus

We employed an in vitro cell-free transcription system to locate RNA polymerase II promoters on the hepatitis B virus genome. The strongest promoter precedes the surface antigen (HBsAg) gene, which is comprised of a long (500 base pairs) presurface region as well as the mature HBsAg coding sequence. The origin of this transcript was localized by using truncated templates and S1 endonuclease mapping. The activity of the promoter was confirmed in transfection experiments in which the complete HBsAg gene was introduced into monkey kidney cells via a simian virus 40 expression vector. A second RNA polymerase II promoter preceding the HBcAg gene was also active in the cell-free system. The presence of multiple promoters in the hepatitis B virus genome suggests that the relative levels of viral-specific proteins detected in liver and serum may reflect differential or regulated promoter efficiency.

Regulation of simian virus 40 gene expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 2019-2028
Author(s):  
T Michaeli ◽  
C Prives
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
T Antigen ◽  
Oocyte Nucleus ◽  
Xenopus Laevis Oocytes ◽  
Large T Antigen ◽  
Viral Dna ◽  
Infected Monkey ◽  
Sv40 Dna

Expression of the simian virus 40 (SV40) early and late regions was examined in Xenopus laevis oocytes microinjected with viral DNA. In contrast to the situation in monkey cells, both late-strand-specific (L-strand) RNA and early-strand-specific (E-strand) RNA could be detected as early as 2 h after injection. At all time points tested thereafter, L-strand RNA was synthesized in excess over E-strand RNA. Significantly greater quantities of L-strand, relative to E-strand, RNA were detected over a 100-fold range of DNA concentrations injected. Analysis of the subcellular distribution of [35S]methionine-labeled viral proteins revealed that while the majority of the VP-1 and all detectable small t antigen were found in the oocyte cytoplasm, most of the large T antigen was located in the oocyte nucleus. The presence of the large T antigen in the nucleus led us to investigate whether this viral product influences the relative synthesis of late or early RNA in the oocyte as it does in infected monkey cells. Microinjection of either mutant C6 SV40 DNA, which encodes a large T antigen unable to bind specifically to viral regulatory sequences, or deleted viral DNA lacking part of the large T antigen coding sequences yielded ratios of L-strand to E-strand RNA that were similar to those observed with wild-type SV40 DNA. Taken together, these observations suggest that the regulation of SV40 RNA synthesis in X. laevis oocytes occurs by a fundamentally different mechanism than that observed in infected monkey cells. This notion was further supported by the observation that the major 5' ends of L-strand RNA synthesized in oocytes were different from those detected in infected cells. Furthermore, only a subset of those L-strand RNAs were polyadenylated.

A transcriptionally active tRNA gene interferes with nucleosome positioning in vivo

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 4015-4025
Author(s):  
R H Morse ◽  
S Y Roth ◽  
R T Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Trna Gene ◽  
Rna Polymerase Iii ◽  
Nucleosome Positioning ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Trna Genes ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Cis Acting

Incorporation into a positioned nucleosome of a cis-acting element essential for replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae disrupts the function of the element in vivo [R. T. Simpson, Nature (London) 343:387-389, 1990]. Furthermore, nucleosome positioning has been implicated in repression of transcription by RNA polymerase II in yeast cells. We have now asked whether the function of cis-acting elements essential for transcription of a gene transcribed by RNA polymerase III can be similarly affected. A tRNA gene was fused to either of two nucleosome positioning signals such that the predicted nucleosome would incorporate near its center the tRNA start site and essential A-box element. These constructs were then introduced into yeast cells on stably maintained, multicopy plasmids. Competent tRNA genes were transcribed in vivo and were not incorporated into positioned nucleosomes. Mutated, inactive tRNA genes were incorporated into nucleosomes whose positions were as predicted. This finding demonstrates that the transcriptional competence of the tRNA gene determined its ability to override a nucleosome positioning signal in vivo and establishes that a hierarchy exists between cis-acting elements and nucleosome positioning signals.

Transcription initiation from the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is positioned by HIP1 binding at the initiation site

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 653-661
Author(s):  
A L Means ◽  
P J Farnham
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Dihydrofolate Reductase ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Sequence Element ◽  
Initiator Element

We have identified a sequence element that specifies the position of transcription initiation for the dihydrofolate reductase gene. Unlike the functionally analogous TATA box that directs RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription 30 nucleotides downstream, the positioning element of the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is located directly at the site of transcription initiation. By using DNase I footprint analysis, we have shown that a protein binds to this initiator element. Transcription initiated at the dihydrofolate reductase initiator element when 28 nucleotides were inserted between it and all other upstream sequences, or when it was placed on either side of the DNA helix, suggesting that there is no strict spatial requirement between the initiator and an upstream element. Although neither a single Sp1-binding site nor a single initiator element was sufficient for transcriptional activity, the combination of one Sp1-binding site and the dihydrofolate reductase initiator element cloned into a plasmid vector resulted in transcription starting at the initiator element. We have also shown that the simian virus 40 late major initiation site has striking sequence homology to the dihydrofolate reductase initiation site and that the same, or a similar, protein binds to both sites. Examination of the sequences at other RNA polymerase II initiation sites suggests that we have identified an element that is important in the transcription of other housekeeping genes. We have thus named the protein that binds to the initiator element HIP1 (Housekeeping Initiator Protein 1).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document