scholarly journals The Fungal Tree of Life: From Molecular Systematics to Genome-Scale Phylogenies

2017 ◽  
pp. 3-34 ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 1-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Spatafora ◽  
M. Catherine Aime ◽  
Igor V. Grigoriev ◽  
Francis Martin ◽  
Jason E. Stajich ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0240953
Author(s):  
Christian Schulz ◽  
Eivind Almaas

Approaches for systematizing information of relatedness between organisms is important in biology. Phylogenetic analyses based on sets of highly conserved genes are currently the basis for the Tree of Life. Genome-scale metabolic reconstructions contain high-quality information regarding the metabolic capability of an organism and are typically restricted to metabolically active enzyme-encoding genes. While there are many tools available to generate draft reconstructions, expert-level knowledge is still required to generate and manually curate high-quality genome-scale metabolic models and to fill gaps in their reaction networks. Here, we use the tool AutoKEGGRec to construct 975 genome-scale metabolic draft reconstructions encoded in the KEGG database without further curation. The organisms are selected across all three domains, and their metabolic networks serve as basis for generating phylogenetic trees. We find that using all reactions encoded, these metabolism-based comparisons give rise to a phylogenetic tree with close similarity to the Tree of Life. While this tree is quite robust to reasonable levels of noise in the metabolic reaction content of an organism, we find a significant heterogeneity in how much noise an organism may tolerate before it is incorrectly placed in the tree. Furthermore, by using the protein sequences for particular metabolic functions and pathway sets, such as central carbon-, nitrogen-, and sulfur-metabolism, as basis for the organism comparisons, we generate highly specific phylogenetic trees. We believe the generation of phylogenetic trees based on metabolic reaction content, in particular when focused on specific functions and pathways, could aid the identification of functionally important metabolic enzymes and be of value for genome-scale metabolic modellers and enzyme-engineers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Bewick ◽  
Brigitte T. Hofmeister ◽  
Rob A. Powers ◽  
Stephen J. Mondo ◽  
Igor V. Grigoriev ◽  
...  

Mycologia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 850-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Celio ◽  
M. Padamsee ◽  
B.T.M. Dentinger ◽  
R. Bauer ◽  
D.J. McLaughlin

Mycologia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 838-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Taylor ◽  
M. L. Berbee

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 488-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. McLaughlin ◽  
David S. Hibbett ◽  
François Lutzoni ◽  
Joseph W. Spatafora ◽  
Rytas Vilgalys

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akanksha Pandey ◽  
Edward L. Braun

AbstractPhylogenomics has revolutionized the study of evolutionary relationships. However, genome-scale data have not been able to resolve all relationships in the tree of life. This could reflect the poor-fit of the models used to analyze heterogeneous datasets; that heterogeneity is likely to have many explanations. However, it seems reasonable to hypothesize that the different patterns of selection on proteins based on their structures might represent a source of heterogeneity. To test that hypothesis, we developed an efficient pipeline to divide phylogenomic datasets that comprise proteins into subsets based on secondary structure and relative solvent accessibility. We then tested whether amino acids in different structural environments had different signals for the deepest branches in the metazoan tree of life. Sites located in different structural environments did support distinct tree topologies. The most striking difference in phylogenetic signal reflected relative solvent accessibility; analyses of sites on the surface of proteins yielded a tree that placed ctenophores sister to all other animals whereas sites buried inside proteins yielded a tree with a sponge-ctenophore clade. These differences in phylogenetic signal were not ameliorated when we repeated our analyses using the site-heterogeneous CAT model, a mixture model that is often used for analyses of protein datasets. In fact, analyses using the CAT model actually resulted in rearrangements that are unlikely to represent evolutionary history. These results provide striking evidence that it will be necessary to achieve a better understanding the constraints due to protein structure to improve phylogenetic estimation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document