scholarly journals Mississippian southern Laurentia tuffs came from a northern Gondwana arc

Geology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hepeng Tian ◽  
Majie Fan ◽  
Victor A. Valencia ◽  
Kevin Chamberlain ◽  
Robert J. Stern ◽  
...  

A Paleozoic arc that formed by southward subduction of the Rheic oceanic plate beneath northern Gondwana has long been inferred, but its history and geochemical signatures remain poorly understood. New U-Pb ages, juvenile εHf signatures, and trace-element composition data of young zircons from tuffs at two southern Laurentia sites indicate their derivation from a continental arc that was active from ca. 328 to ca. 317 Ma and permit correlation of sedimentary sequences 800 km apart in southern Laurentia. These include the Stanley tuffs in the Ouachita Mountains of southeastern Oklahoma and southwestern Arkansas and the newly discovered Barnett tuff in the subsurface of the Midland Basin in west Texas (USA). The Barnett tuff has a zircon chemical abrasion–isotope dilution–thermal ionization mass spectrometry U-Pb date of 327.8 ± 0.8 Ma, similar to the oldest Stanley tuff in the Ouachita Mountains. Zircon Hf isotope depleted mantle model ages further suggest that the source was a continental arc on basement with both Grenville and Pan-African affinities, pointing to northern Gondwana or peri-Gondwana terranes. The new data link the tuffs to granitoids (326 Ma) of the Maya block in southern Mexico, which was part of northern Gondwana. Correlation of the Stanley-Barnett tuffs across southern Laurentia suggests the likely presence of Mississippian tuffs over a broad region in southern Laurentia, and their usefulness for constraining absolute ages of basin fills and characterizing the Gondwanan arc.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hepeng Tian ◽  
◽  
Majie Fan ◽  
Lowell Waite ◽  
Robert J. Stern ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hepeng Tian ◽  
◽  
Majie Fan ◽  
Kevin R. Chamberlain ◽  
Lowell Waite ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
pp. 1224-1244
Author(s):  
Lowell Waite ◽  
Majie Fan ◽  
Dylan Collins ◽  
George Gehrels ◽  
Robert J. Stern

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. McGlue ◽  
Patrick W. Baldwin ◽  
Lowell Waite ◽  
Olivia P. Woodruff ◽  
Patrick T. Ryan
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 155 (7) ◽  
pp. 1507-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
STIG M. BERGSTRÖM ◽  
ANNALISA FERRETTI

AbstractOlistostromes with calcareous olistoliths are rare components in the Ordovician successions in NW Europe and North America, having been described from only a small number of localities. One of the best exposed, but least known, is in the Garn Formation in coastal outcrops in Anglesey in northwestern Wales. Here, in the graptolite-bearing shales of the Garn Formation, there are numerous limestone olistoliths that are derived from an otherwise unknown ‘ghost’ formation whose original depositional site remains an enigma. These olistoliths contain a Baltoscandian type of conodont fauna that is otherwise unknown in Wales and England. It represents the Baltoniodus variabilis Subzone of the Amorphognathus tvaerensis Zone. Similar, but slightly older, conodont faunas are recorded from olistoliths in the Tweeddale Member of the Shinnel Formation in southern Scotland and in probable olistoliths of the Cobbs Arm Limestone in northeasternmost Newfoundland. Approximately coeval conodont faunas are present in calcareous olistoliths in the Woods Hollow Shale of West Texas and the Womble Shale in the Ouachita Mountains of Arkansas, USA. Lithological and conodont evidence indicates that the calcareous olistoliths were derived from carbonate sediments deposited in relatively shallow water. It is concluded that the study of ‘ghost’ formation olistoliths may provide otherwise unavailable but important data bearing on the marine depositional history of a particular region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document