Role of bivalve mollusks in the sediment balance of the Anapa Bay Bar

Oceanology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Kosyan ◽  
N. V. Kucheruk ◽  
M. V. Flint
Chemosphere ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 680-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Zuykov ◽  
Emilien Pelletier ◽  
Richard Saint-Louis ◽  
Antonio Checa ◽  
Serge Demers

2021 ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
Bukina

Trichinosis is a dangerous anthropozoonotic disease caused by a nematode of the genus Trichinella. Being polyhostal, Trichinella is recorded in more than 150 species of animals, including marine mammals. While the circulation mechanism in terrestrial animal species is well-studied and has a logical explanation, the ways of infection of marine mammals remain unexplored in many respects up to the present. Among marine mammals, trichinosis is most common in walruses with the prevalence of 1.5% (Bukina L.A., 2015). The main sources of trichinosis infection for benthophagous walruses are probably their most important prey items, amphipods and bivalve mollusks. The purpose of the present paper was to study the role of bivalves in the transmission of infective material to a potential host. In the experimental infection, decapsulated trichinella larvae isolated from the muscle tissue of cage-kept arctic foxes were used. Trichinella larvae were isolated by the method of trichinelloscopy and digestion of muscle tissue in artificial gastric juice. It was found that the filter feeding structure of mussels does not let trichinella pass into the intestine. However, larvae trapped in the mantle cavity are filtered out and removed as pseudofaeces through the excurrent siphon to the environment. At the same time, they remain viable for 113 hours. The most invasive and viable were trichinella isolated from pseudofaeces and wash off from the mantle cavity (mantle complex) within 30 to 70 hours. The bio-assays performed on white outbred mice were positive. Therefore, mussels can be direct or indirect sources of the invasion. Taking into account that walruses can eat more than 3,000 mollusks in one feeding, the probability of infection increases significantly.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winnifred R. Louis ◽  
Craig McGarty ◽  
Emma F. Thomas ◽  
Catherine E. Amiot ◽  
Fathali M. Moghaddam

AbstractWhitehouse adapts insights from evolutionary anthropology to interpret extreme self-sacrifice through the concept of identity fusion. The model neglects the role of normative systems in shaping behaviors, especially in relation to violent extremism. In peaceful groups, increasing fusion will actually decrease extremism. Groups collectively appraise threats and opportunities, actively debate action options, and rarely choose violence toward self or others.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefen Beeler-Duden ◽  
Meltem Yucel ◽  
Amrisha Vaish

Abstract Tomasello offers a compelling account of the emergence of humans’ sense of obligation. We suggest that more needs to be said about the role of affect in the creation of obligations. We also argue that positive emotions such as gratitude evolved to encourage individuals to fulfill cooperative obligations without the negative quality that Tomasello proposes is inherent in obligations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Whiten

Abstract The authors do the field of cultural evolution a service by exploring the role of non-social cognition in human cumulative technological culture, truly neglected in comparison with socio-cognitive abilities frequently assumed to be the primary drivers. Some specifics of their delineation of the critical factors are problematic, however. I highlight recent chimpanzee–human comparative findings that should help refine such analyses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document