Activity of sucrose synthase in trunk tissues of Karelian birch during cambial growth

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Galibina ◽  
L. L. Novitskaya ◽  
M. S. Krasavina ◽  
Yu. L. Moshchenskaya
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 616-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. L. Moshchenskaya ◽  
N. A. Galibina ◽  
L. V. Topchieva ◽  
L. L. Novitskaya

Author(s):  
L.V. Vetchinnikova ◽  
◽  
A.F. Titov ◽  
◽  

The article reports on the application of the best known principles for mapping natural populations of curly (Karelian) birch Betula pendula Roth var. carelica (Mercklin) Hämet-Ahti – one of the most appealing representatives of the forest tree flora. Relying on the synthesis and analysis of the published data amassed over nearly 100 years and the data from own full-scale studies done in the past few decades almost throughout the area where curly birch has grown naturally, it is concluded that its range outlined in the middle of the 20th century and since then hardly revised is outdated. The key factors and reasons necessitating its revision are specified. Herewith it is suggested that the range is delineated using the population approach, and the key element will be the critical population size below which the population is no longer viable in the long term. This approach implies that the boundaries of the taxon range depend on the boundaries of local populations (rather than the locations of individual trees or small clumps of trees), the size of which should not be lower than the critical value, which is supposed to be around 100–500 trees for curly birch. A schematic map of the curly birch range delineated using this approach is provided. We specially address the problem of determining the minimum population size to secure genetic diversity maintenance. The advantages of the population approach to delineating the distribution range of curly birch with regard to its biological features are highlighted. The authors argue that it enables a more accurate delineation of the range; shows the natural evolutionary history of the taxon (although it is not yet officially recognized as a species) and its range; can be relatively easily updated (e.g. depending on the scope of reintroduction); should be taken into account when working on the strategy of conservation and other actions designed to maintain and regenerate this unique representative of the forest tree flora.


2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 1598-1609
Author(s):  
N. A. Galibina ◽  
L. L. Novitskaya ◽  
K. M. Nikerova ◽  
E. V. Moshkina ◽  
Yu. L. Moshchenskaya ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Chiao Huang ◽  
Erh-Chieh Hsiang ◽  
Chien-Chih Yang ◽  
Ai-Yu Wang

Planta ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 210 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Biemelt ◽  
Mohammad Reza Hajirezaei ◽  
Michael Melzer ◽  
Gerd Albrecht ◽  
Uwe Sonnewald

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Koch ◽  
Kurt D. Nolte ◽  
Edwin R. Duke ◽  
Donald R. McCarty ◽  
Wayne T. Avigne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document