Surface Electrostimulation of Acupuncture Points for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit – a Pilot Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Nayak ◽  
Richard Wenstone ◽  
Andy Jones ◽  
Jill Nolan ◽  
Ann Strong ◽  
...  

Background This is a pilot study to investigate the effects of electrostimulation of acupuncture points on sedation and the dose of sedatives in the Intensive Care Unit. Methods Electrostimulation of acupuncture points was performed on 12 critically ill patients requiring sedation for mechanical ventilation. Electrostimulation was applied by point surface electrodes at LI4, ST36, HT7 and LR3 points for 20 minutes every hour for 12 hours using dense dispersed mode with a current frequency of 10–100Hz and maximum intensity of 10mA. All patients were sedated with propofol and alfentanil as required. The dose of propofol was reduced by 10mg/hour provided the patient remained sedated according to our guidelines. Sedation and analgesia scores, dose of sedative and analgesics drugs, respiratory rate, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and compliance with the ventilator were recorded before electrostimulation of acupuncture points, and hourly thereafter for 12 hours. Results There was significant reduction in the median propofol consumption from 145mg/hour (range 30–250) to 15mg/hour (range 0–250) (P<0.05), without any significant change in sedation scores or analgesia scores. The haemodynamic and respiratory variables remained stable. All patients were compliant with the ventilator. Conclusion This pilot study showed significant reduction in the dose of propofol required for sedation in critically ill patients following surface electrostimulation of acupuncture points, without any adverse effects. A randomised controlled trial is warranted.

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balbino Rivail Ventura Nepomuceno Júnior ◽  
Bruno Prata Martinez ◽  
Mansueto Gomes Neto

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-306
Author(s):  
Diego Dias de Araujo ◽  
Daniel Vinicius Alves Silva ◽  
Carolina Amaral Oliveira Rodrigues ◽  
Patricia Oliveira Silva ◽  
Tamara Goncalves Rezende Macieira ◽  
...  

Background Critically ill patients are susceptible to the development of dry eye. Few studies have been conducted on how to best prevent and treat this condition. Objective To compare the effectiveness of 2 nursing interventions in preventing dry eye in adult intensive care unit patients: liquid artificial tears (Lacribell; Latinofarma) and artificial tears gel (Vidisic Gel; Bausch and Lomb). Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 140 participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: a liquid artificial tears group (n = 70) and an artificial tears gel group (n = 70). The study inclusion criteria were as follows: admission to the intensive care unit, age of 18 years or older, no diagnosis of dry eye at admission, receipt of mechanical ventilation, blink rate of less than 5 times per minute, and a score of 7 or less on the Glasgow Coma Scale. On 5 consecutive days, a single researcher who was unaware of the treatment assignment assessed the participants’ eyes using the fluorescein eye stain test and the Schirmer test for dry eye. Results Dry eye developed in 21% of participants who received liquid artificial tears versus 9% of participants who received artificial tears gel (P = .04). Conclusions In this study, artificial tears gel was superior to liquid artificial tears in preventing the development of dry eye. These results may help nurses deliver evidence-based eye care aimed at reducing the risk of dry eye in critically ill patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 26647
Author(s):  
Nathalya Tamara Costa Fermiano ◽  
Odete Mauad Cavenaghi ◽  
Juliana Rodrigues Correia ◽  
Marcus Vinicius Camargo De Brito ◽  
Lucas Lima Ferreira

*** Evaluation of pain levels of critically ill intensive care unit patients, before, during and after a session of chest physical therapy: a pilot study ***AIMS: To evaluate pain levels of critically ill patients before, during, and after a chest physical therapy intervention.METHODS: Pilot study conducted at the intensive care unit (ICU) of a teaching hospital. Sedated and mechanically ventilated adult patients aged 18 to 60 years were selected. Sociodemographic, clinical, and hemodynamic data were analyzed, and the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) scale was used to assess pain in patients unable to be evaluated by self-report questionnaires.The physical therapy protocol consisted of  manual vibrocompression maneuvers in both hemithoraces and of intratracheal aspiration. The hemodynamic variables and the BPS were analyzed in three periods: immediately before, in the fifth minute of intervention, and immediately after physical therapy. The Shapiro-Wilk test and ANOVA were used for the statistical analyses. The level of significance was p ≤0.05.RESULTS: The sample consisted of 22 patients, most of them male, aged 55±23.8 years. Nosocomial pneumonia the most prevalent pathology. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic variables and in pain assessment (p = 0.78) of the critically ill patients in any of the evaluated periods.CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of critically ill and mechanically ventilated ICU patients , no alterations in pain levels were detected during or after chest physical therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document