scholarly journals Agreement of Medicaid claims and electronic health records for assessing preventive care quality among adults

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Heintzman ◽  
S. R. Bailey ◽  
M. J. Hoopes ◽  
T. Le ◽  
R. Gold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Preventive Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

Implementing Health Care Quality Measures in Electronic Health Records: A Conceptual Model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire M. Campbell ◽  
Daniel R. Murphy ◽  
George E. Taffet ◽  
Anita B. Major ◽  
Christine S. Ritchie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Conceptual Model ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals The Digitization of Patient Care: A Review of the Effects of Electronic Health Records on Health Care Quality and Utilization

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 487-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilal Atasoy ◽  
Brad N. Greenwood ◽  
Jeffrey Scott McCullough
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Informatics ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Policy Practice ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Cost Implications

Electronic health records (EHRs) adoption has become nearly universal during the past decade. Academic research into the effects of EHRs has examined factors influencing adoption, clinical care benefits, financial and cost implications, and more. We provide an interdisciplinary overview and synthesis of this literature, drawing on work in public and population health, informatics, medicine, management information systems, and economics. We then chart paths forward for policy, practice, and research.

scholarly journals Electronic Health Records as Valuable Data Sources in the Health Care Quality Improvement Process

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 233339281985287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Wikström ◽  
Maija Toivakka ◽  
Päivi Rautiainen ◽  
Hilkka Tirkkonen ◽  
Teppo Repo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Regional Differences ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Data Retrieval ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Valuable Data ◽  
Electronic Health

Background: In North Karelia, Finland, the regional electronic health records (EHRs) enable flexible data retrieval and area-level analyses. The aim of this study was to assess the early detection of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the region and to evaluate the performed activities in order to improve the processes between the years 2012 and 2017. Methods: Patients with T2D were identified from the EHRs using the ICD-10 codes registered during any visit to either primary or specialized care. The prevalence of T2D was calculated for the years 2012, 2015, and 2017 on the municipality level. The number of people found in the EHRs with diabetes was compared with the number found in the national register of medication reimbursement rights. Results: In 2012, the age-adjusted prevalence of T2D in North Karelia varied considerably between municipalities (5.5%-8.6%). These differences indicate variation in the processes of early diagnosis. The findings were discussed in the regional network of health professionals treating patients with T2D, resulting in sharing experiences and best practices. In 2017, the differences had notably diminished, and in most municipalities, the prevalence exceeded 8%. The regional differences in the prevalence and their downward trend were observed both in the EHRs and in the medication reimbursement rights register. Conclusion: Clear differences in the prevalence of T2D were detected between municipalities. After visualizing these differences and providing information for the professionals, the early detection of T2D improved and the regional differences decreased. The EHRs are a valuable data source for knowledge-based management and quality improvement.

scholarly journals Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Health Records, Communication, and Patient Safety Across Diverse Medical Oncology Practices

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e529-e536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minal R. Patel ◽  
Christopher R. Friese ◽  
Kari Mendelsohn-Victor ◽  
Alex J. Fauer ◽  
Bidisha Ghosh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Seamless Integration ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Clinician Communication ◽  
Electronic Health

PURPOSE: We know little about how increased technological sophistication of clinical practices affects safety of chemotherapy delivery in the outpatient setting. This study investigated to what degree electronic health records (EHRs), satisfaction with technology, and quality of clinician-to-clinician communication enable a safety culture. METHODS: We measured actions consistent with a safety culture, satisfaction with practice technology, and quality of clinician communication using validated instruments among 297 oncology nurses and prescribers in a statewide collaborative. We constructed an index to reflect practice reliance on EHRs (1 = “all paper” to 5 = “all electronic”). Linear regression models (with robust SEs to account for clustering) examined relationships between independent variables of interest and safety. Models were adjusted for clinician age. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 68% (76% for nurses and 59% for prescribers). The mean (standard deviation) safety score was 5.3 (1.1), with a practice-level range of 4.9 to 5.4. Prescribers reported fewer safety actions than nurses. Higher satisfaction with technology and higher-quality clinician communication were significantly associated with increased safety actions, whereas increased reliance on EHRs was significantly associated with lower safety actions. CONCLUSION: Practices vary in their performance of patient safety actions. Supporting clinicians to integrate technology and strengthen communication are promising intervention targets. The inverse relationship between reliance on EHRs and safety suggests that technology may not facilitate clinicians’ ability to attend to patient safety. Efforts to improve cancer care quality should focus on more seamless integration of EHRs into routine care delivery and emphasize increasing the capacity of all care clinicians to communicate effectively and coordinate efforts when administering high-risk treatments in ambulatory settings.

scholarly journals Electronic health records and health care quality over time in a federally qualified health center

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Kern ◽  
Alison M. Edwards ◽  
Michelle Pichardo ◽  
Rainu Kaushal
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Meaningful Use ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Federally Qualified Health Center ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract The longitudinal effects of electronic health records (EHRs) on ambulatory quality are not clear. It is not known whether adoption and meaningful use of EHRs result in a brief period of quality improvement that then plateaus, or whether with ongoing use quality improvement continues. We studied health care quality at six sites of a Federally Qualified Health Center in New York State over 3 years (2008–2010) for 25 290 unique patients. Patients were twice as likely to receive recommended care on a set of 12 quality measures (11 of which are included in Stage 1 Meaningful Use) 3 years post-EHR implementation, compared to 1-year post-implementation (odds ratio 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.91–2.03). The magnitude of absolute improvement ranged from 5% to 20% per measure. EHRs were associated with continuing improvement in health care quality for at least 3 years post-implementation in the safety-net setting of a Federally Qualified Health Center.

The Physician-Patient Relationship and a National Health Information Network

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Pickering Francis
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Information ◽  
National Health ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Information Network ◽  
Physician Patient Relationship ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Physician Patient

The United States, like other countries facing rising health care costs, is pursuing a commitment to interoperable electronic health records. Electronic records, it is thought, have the potential to reduce the risks of error, improve care coordination, monitor care quality, enable patients to participate more fully in care management, and provide the data needed for research and surveillance. Interoperable electronic health records on a national scale — the ideal of a national health information network (or NHIN) — seem likely to magnify these advantages. Thus, the recent economic stimulus package contains considerable funding for the development of “health information technology architecture that will support the nationwide electronic exchange and use of health information in a secure, private, and accurate manner.”

scholarly journals Towards an Adoption Framework for Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Systematic Literature Mapping Study

10.2196/15150 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e15150
Author(s):  
Hugo J T van Mens ◽  
Ruben D Duijm ◽  
Remko Nienhuis ◽  
Nicolette F de Keizer ◽  
Ronald Cornet
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Patient Access ◽  
System Quality ◽  
Patient Portals ◽  
Health Records ◽  
System Use ◽  
Electronic Health

Background Patient access to electronic health records (EHRs) is associated with increased patient engagement and health care quality outcomes. However, the adoption of patient portals and personal health records (PHRs) that facilitate this access is impeded by barriers. The Clinical Adoption Framework (CAF) has been developed to analyze EHR adoption, but this framework does not consider the patient as an end-user. Objective We aim to extend the scope of the CAF to patient access to EHRs, develop guidance documentation for the application of the CAF, and assess the interrater reliability. Methods We systematically reviewed existing systematic reviews on patients' access to EHRs and PHRs. Results of each review were mapped to one of the 43 CAF categories. Categories were iteratively adapted when needed. We measured the interrater reliability with Cohen’s unweighted kappa and statistics regarding the agreement among reviewers on mapping quotes of the reviews to different CAF categories. Results We further defined the framework’s inclusion and exclusion criteria for 33 of the 43 CAF categories and achieved a moderate agreement among the raters, which varied between categories. Conclusions In the reviews, categories about people, organization, system quality, system use, and the net benefits of system use were addressed more often than those about international and regional information and communication technology infrastructures, standards, politics, incentive programs, and social trends. Categories that were addressed less might have been underdefined in this study. The guidance documentation we developed can be applied to systematic literature reviews and implementation studies, patient and informal caregiver access to EHRs, and the adoption of PHRs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document