THU0174 Endothelial microparticles and circulating endothelial progenitor cells in primary sjægren’s syndrome patients: A potential marker of endothelial damage?

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 214.2-214
Author(s):  
E. Bartoloni ◽  
A. Alunno ◽  
M. Pirro ◽  
O. Bistoni ◽  
G. Schillaci ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1819-1819
Author(s):  
Joaquin J. Jimenez ◽  
Alexander Ferreira ◽  
Hannah J. Dodson ◽  
Katherine M. Lens ◽  
Lucia M. Mauro ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: High cholesterol (HC) is known to adversely affect endothelial cells (EC) and has been shown to correlate with decreased levels of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPC). We assayed endothelial microparticles (EMP), a sensitive indicator of EC perturbation, to investigate relations among HC, CEPC, and injury of coronary artery endothelial cells (CAEC), both in vivo and in vitro. METHODS: Twelve subjects with normal cholesterol (150 ±30 mg/dL, control) and 12 with HC (250 ±25) were studied. EMP were assayed by flow cytometry using fluorescent antibodies and CAEC were cultured as previously described [Jimenez et al, Thromb Res 109:175, 2003]. CEPC were isolated, cultured, and assayed for endothelial colony formation (CFU) as described [Hill et al, NEJM 348:593, 2003]. RESULTS: Comparing the two groups, EMP measured by CD31+/CD42b− were nearly 2.5-fold elevated in HC as compared to controls (1.7 ±0.5 ×106/mL vs.0.35 ±0.02 ×106/mL; p<0.01). Cholesterol levels correlated well with this measure of EMP (R=0.60, p=0.002). However, no significant correlation was found between CD62E+ EMP and cholesterol levels. Assay of CEPC revealed a nearly 2.5-fold decrease in CFU in HC vs. controls (10 ±2 vs. 25 ±4; p<0.01). In studies in vitro, CEPC from controls were cultured in presence of 20% 0.1μm filtered plasma from members of both groups. The HC group plasma inhibited CEPC colony formation by almost 50% (23 ±3.5 CFU for control plasma vs. 13 ±4 colonies for HC plasma). We next assessed the longer-term effect of HC plasma on CAEC cultures. Six-day culture of CAEC in the presence of 20% plasma resulted in a significant increase of CD31+/CD42b− EMP from CAEC treated with HC plasma vs. normal plasma (6.5 ±0.7 ×106/mL vs. 0.23 ±0.03 ×106/mL; p=0.02). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that EMP are useful markers to monitor cholesterol mediated-EC changes. High EMP levels inversely reflect the vascular endothelial cell regeneration potential due to decreased circulating endothelial progenitor cells.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 937.1-937
Author(s):  
V. Pulito-Cueto ◽  
S. Remuzgo-Martínez ◽  
F. Genre ◽  
V. M. Mora-Cuesta ◽  
D. Iturbe Fernández ◽  
...  

Background:Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most significant comorbidities of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), increasing the mortality in these patients [1,2]. Although the pathogenesis of ILD associated to RA (RA-ILD+) remains poorly defined [1], it is known that vascular tissue plays a crucial role in lung physiology [3]. In this context, a population of cells termed endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are involved in vasculogenesis and endothelial tissue repair [4]. Previous reports suggest the implication of EPC in different conditions such as RA and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the most common and destructive ILD [5,6]. Nevertheless, little is known about their specific role in RA-ILD+.Objectives:The purpose of this study was to shed light on the potential role of EPC in endothelial damage in RA-ILD+.Methods:Peripheral venous blood was collected from a total of 68 individuals (18 with RA-ILD+, 17 with RA-ILD-, 19 with IPF and 14 healthy controls). All subjects were recruited from the Rheumatology and Pneumology departments of Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain. Quantification of EPC was analyzed by the expression of surface antigens by flow cytometry. The combination of antibodies against the stem cell marker CD34, the immature progenitor marker CD133, the endothelial marker VEGF receptor 2 (CD309) and the common leukocyte antigen CD45 was used. EPC were considered as CD34+, CD45Low, CD309+and CD133+. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism software 5 (GraphPad).Results:EPC frequency was significantly increased in patients with RA-ILD+, RA-ILD-and IPF compared to controls (p=0.001, p=0.002, p< 0.0001, respectively). Nevertheless, patients with RA, both RA-ILD+and RA-ILD-, showed a lower frequency of EPC than those with IPF (p= 0.048, p= 0.006, respectively).Conclusion:Our results provide evidence for a potential role of EPC as a reparative compensatory mechanism related to endothelial damage in RA-ILD+, RA-ILD-and IPF patients. Interestingly, EPC frequency may help to establish a differential diagnostic between patients with IPF and those who have an underlying autoimmune disease (RA-ILD+).References:[1] J Clin Med 2019; 8: 2038;[2] Arthritis Rheumatol 2015; 67: 28-38;[3] Nat Protoc 2015; 10: 1697-1708;[4] Science 1997; 275: 964-966;[5] Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51: 1775-1784;[6] Angiogenesis 2013; 16: 147-157.Acknowledgments:Personal funds, VP-C: PREVAL18/01 (IDIVAL); SR-M: RD16/0012/0009 (ISCIII-ERDF); LL-G: PI18/00042 (ISCIII-ERDF); RL-M: Miguel Servet type I CP16/00033 (ISCIII-ESF).Disclosure of Interests:Verónica Pulito-Cueto: None declared, Sara Remuzgo-Martínez: None declared, Fernanda Genre: None declared, Victor Manuel Mora-Cuesta: None declared, David Iturbe Fernández: None declared, Sonia Fernández-Rozas: None declared, Leticia Lera-Gómez: None declared, Pilar Alonso Lecue: None declared, Javier Rodriguez Carrio: None declared, Belén Atienza-Mateo: None declared, Virginia Portilla: None declared, David Merino: None declared, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma. MSD, Alfonso Corrales Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Jose Manuel Cifrián-Martínez: None declared, Raquel López-Mejías: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document