SAT0391 Does dynamic contrast-enhanced mri provide better separation of active early rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy controls than conventional MRI?:

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 604.2-605
Author(s):  
M.B. Axelsen ◽  
B.J. Ejbjerg ◽  
M.L. Hetland ◽  
K. Hørslev-Petersen ◽  
U.B. Lauridsen ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Hodgson ◽  
Theresa Barnes ◽  
Sylvia Connolly ◽  
Brian Eyes ◽  
Robert S. D. Campbell ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Hodgson ◽  
A Grainger ◽  
P O’Connor ◽  
T Barnes ◽  
S Connolly ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 777-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Qiu Su ◽  
Shan-Shan Lu ◽  
Qiu-Yue Han ◽  
Mao-Dong Zhou ◽  
Xun-Ning Hong

Background The application of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in glioma grading is limited and non-specific. Purpose To investigate the application values of MRI, texture analysis (TA) of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and intratumoral susceptibility signal (ITSS) on susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), alone and in combination, for glioma grading. Material and Methods Fifty-two patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas who underwent DCE-MRI and SWI were enrolled in this retrospective study. Conventional MRIs were evaluated by the VASARI scoring system. TA of DCE-MRI-derived parameters and the degree of ITSS were compared between low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The diagnostic ability of each parameter and their combination for glioma grading were analyzed. Results Significant statistical differences in VASARI features were observed between LGGs and HGGs ( P < 0.05), of which the enhancement quality had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.873) with 93.3% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The TA of DCE-MRI derived parameters were significantly different between LGGs and HGGs ( P < 0.05), of which the uniformity of Ktrans had the highest AUC (0.917) with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The degree of ITSS was significantly different between LGGs and HGGs ( P < 0.001). The AUC of the ITSS was 0.925 with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The best discriminative power was obtained from a combination of enhancement quality, Ktrans- uniformity, and ITSS, resulting in 96.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.993. Conclusion Combining conventional MRI, TA of DCE-MRI, and ITSS on SWI may help to improve the differentiation between LGGs and HGGs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document