A disconnect between disease activity and functional ability already in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, depending on large joint involvement

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (7) ◽  
pp. 1085-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Rubbert-Roth ◽  
Johannes W G Jacobs ◽  
Johannes W J Bijlsma ◽  
Paco M J Welsing
2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 2081-2087 ◽  
Author(s):  
LONNIE PYNE ◽  
VIVIAN P. BYKERK ◽  
GILLES BOIRE ◽  
BOULOS HARAOUI ◽  
CAROL HITCHON ◽  
...  

Objective.To determine the factors most strongly associated with an increase in therapy of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA).Methods.Data from the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) were included if the patient had ≥ 2 visits and baseline and 6 months data. A regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with treatment intensification.Results.Of 1145 patients with ERA, 790 met inclusion criteria; mean age was 53.4 years (SD 14.7), mean disease duration 6.1 months (SD 2.8), 75% were female, baseline Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) was 4.7 (SD 1.8) and 2.9 (SD 1.8) at 6 months for included patients. Univariate factors for intensifying treatment were physician global assessment (MDGA; OR 7.8 and OR 7.4 at 3 and 6 months, respectively, p < 0.0005), swollen joint count (SJC; OR 4.7 and OR 7.3 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005), and DAS28 (OR 3.0 and OR 4.6 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005). In the regression model only MDGA was strongly associated with treatment intensification (OR 1.5 and OR 1.2 at 3 and 6 months, p < 0.0005); DAS28 was not consistently predictive (OR 1.0, p = 0.987, and OR 1.2, p = 0.023, at 3 and 6 months). DAS28 was the reason for treatment intensification 2.3% of the time, compared to 51.7% for SJC, 49.9% for tender joint count, and 23.8% for MDGA. For the same SJC, larger joint involvement was more likely to influence treatment than small joints at 3 months (OR 1.4, p = 0.027).Conclusion.MDGA was strongly associated with an increase in treatment at 3 and 6 months in ERA, whereas DAS28 was not. Physicians rarely stated that DAS28 was the reason for increasing treatment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 75 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 454.1-454
Author(s):  
G. Akdemir ◽  
I.M. Markusse ◽  
A.A. Schouffoer ◽  
P.B. de Sonnaville ◽  
B.A. Grillet ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marit Stockfelt ◽  
Anna-Carin Lundell ◽  
Merete Lund Hetland ◽  
Mikkel Østergaard ◽  
Till Uhlig ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The type I interferon (IFN) gene signature is present in a subgroup of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Protein levels of IFNα have not been measured in RA and it is unknown whether they associate with clinical characteristics or treatment effect. Methods Patients with early untreated RA (n = 347) were randomized to methotrexate combined with prednisone, certolizumab-pegol, abatacept, or tocilizumab. Plasma IFNα protein levels were determined by single molecular array (Simoa) before and 24 weeks after treatment initiation and were related to demographic and clinical factors including clinical disease activity index, disease activity score in 28 joints, swollen and tender joint counts, and patient global assessment. Results IFNα protein positivity was found in 26% of the patients, and of these, 92% were double-positive for rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). IFNα protein levels were reduced 24 weeks after treatment initiation, and the absolute change was similar irrespective of treatment. IFNα protein positivity was associated neither with disease activity nor with achievement of CDAI remission 24 weeks after randomization. Conclusion IFNα protein positivity is present in a subgroup of patients with early RA and associates with double-positivity for autoantibodies but not with disease activity. Pre-treatment IFNα positivity did not predict remission in any of the treatment arms, suggesting that the IFNα system is distinct from the pathways of TNF, IL-6, and T-cell activation in early RA. A spin-off study of the NORD-STAR randomized clinical trial, NCT01491815 (ClinicalTrials), registered 12/08/2011, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01491815.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 561.2-562
Author(s):  
X. Liu ◽  
Z. Sun ◽  
W. Guo ◽  
F. Wang ◽  
L. Song ◽  
...  

Background:Experts emphasize early diagnosis and treatment in RA, but the widely used diagnostic criterias fail to meet the accurate judgment of early rheumatoid arthritis. In 2012, Professor Zhanguo Li took the lead in establishing ERA “Chinese standard”, and its sensitivity and accuracy have been recognized by peers. However, the optimal first-line treatment of patients (pts) with undifferentiated arthritis (UA), early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are yet to be established.Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Iguratimod-based (IGU-based) Strategy in the above three types of pts, and to explore the characteristics of the effects of IGU monotherapy and combined treatment.Methods:This prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01548001) was conducted in China. In this phase 4 study pts with RA (ACR 1987 criteria[1]), ERA (not match ACR 1987 criteria[1] but match ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria[2] or 2014 ERA criteria[3]), UA (not match classification criteria for ERA and RA but imaging suggests synovitis) were recruited. We applied different treatments according to the patient’s disease activity at baseline, including IGU monotherapy and combination therapies with methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisone. Specifically, pts with LDA and fewer poor prognostic factors were entered the IGU monotherapy group (25 mg bid), and pts with high disease activity were assigned to combination groups. A Chi-square test was applied for comparison. The primary outcomes were the proportion of pts in remission (REM)or low disease activity (LDA) that is DAS28-ESR<2.6 or 3.2 at 24 weeks, as well as the proportion of pts, achieved ACR20, Boolean remission, and good or moderate EULAR response (G+M).Results:A total of 313 pts (26 pts with UA, 59 pts with ERA, and 228 pts with RA) were included in this study. Of these, 227/313 (72.5%) pts completed the 24-week follow-up. The results showed that 115/227 (50.7%), 174/227 (76.7%), 77/227 (33.9%), 179/227 (78.9%) pts achieved DAS28-ESR defined REM and LDA, ACR20, Boolean remission, G+M response, respectively. All parameters continued to decrease in all pts after treatment (Fig 1).Compared with baseline, the three highest decline indexes of disease activity at week 24 were SW28, CDAI, and T28, with an average decline rate of 73.8%, 61.4%, 58.7%, respectively. Results were similar in three cohorts.We performed a stratified analysis of which IGU treatment should be used in different cohorts. The study found that the proportion of pts with UA and ERA who used IGU monotherapy were significantly higher than those in the RA cohort. While the proportion of triple and quadruple combined use of IGU in RA pts was significantly higher than that of ERA and UA at baseline and whole-course (Fig 2).A total of 81/313 (25.8%) pts in this study had adverse events (AE) with no serious adverse events. The main adverse events were infection(25/313, 7.99%), gastrointestinal disorders(13/313, 4.15%), liver dysfunction(12/313, 3.83%) which were lower than 259/2666 (9.71%) in the previous Japanese phase IV study[4].The most common reasons of lost follow-up were: 1) discontinued after remission 25/86 (29.1%); 2) lost 22/86 (25.6%); 3) drug ineffective 19/86 (22.1%).Conclusion:Both IGU-based monotherapy and combined therapies are tolerant and effective for treating UA, ERA, and RA, while the decline in joint symptoms was most significant. Overall, IGU combination treatments were most used in RA pts, while monotherapy was predominant in ERA and UA pts.References:[1]Levin RW, et al. Scand J Rheumatol 1996, 25(5):277-281.[2]Kay J, et al. Rheumatology 2012, 51(Suppl 6):vi5-9.[3]Zhao J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014, 32(5):667-673.[4]Mimori T, et al. Mod Rheumatol 2019, 29(2):314-323.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 480-480
Author(s):  
S. S. Zhao ◽  
E. Nikiphorou ◽  
A. Young ◽  
P. Kiely

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is classically described as a symmetric small joint polyarthritis with additional involvement of large joints. There is a paucity of information concerning the time course of damage in large joints, such as shoulder, elbow, hip, knee and ankle, from early to established RA, or of the influence of Rheumatoid Factor (RF) status. There is a historic perception that patients who do not have RF follow a milder less destructive course, which might promote less aggressive treatment strategies in RF-negative patients. The historic nature of the Ealy Rheumatoid Arthritis Study (ERAS) provides a unique opportunity to study RA in the context of less aggressive treatment strategies.Objectives:To examine the progression of large joint involvement from early to established RA in terms of range of movement (ROM) and time to joint surgery, according to the presence of RF.Methods:ERAS was a multi-centre inception cohort of newly diagnosed RA patients (<2 years disease duration, csDMARD naive), recruited from 1985-2001 with yearly follow-up for up to 25 (median 10) years. First line treatment was csDMARD monotherapy with/without steroids, favouring sulphasalazine for the majority. Outcome data was recorded at baseline, at 12 months and then once yearly. Patients were deemed RF negative if all repeated assessments were negative. ROM of individual shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, ankle and hindfeet joints was collected at 3, 5, 9 and 12-15 years. The rate of progression from normal to any loss of ROM, from years 3 to 14 was modelled using GEE, adjusting for confounders. Radiographs of wrists taken at years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 were scored according to the Larsen method. Change in the Larsen wrist damage score was modelled using GEE as a continuous variable, while the erosion score was dichotomised into present/absent. Surgical procedure data were obtained by linking to Hospital Episodes Statistics and the National Joint Registry. Time to joint surgery was analysed using multivariable Cox models.Results:A total of 1458 patients from the ERAS cohort were included (66% female, mean age 55 years) and 74% were RF-positive. The prevalence of any loss of ROM, from year 3 through to 14 was highest in the wrist followed by ankle, knee, elbow and hip. The proportion of patients at year 9 with greater than 25% loss of ROM was: wrist 30%, ankle 12%, elbow 7%, knee 7% and hip 5%. Odds of loss of ROM increased over time in all joint regions, at around 7 to 13% per year from year 3 to 14. There was no significant difference between RF-positive and RF-negative patients (see Figure 1). Larsen erosion and damage scores at the wrists progressed in all patients; annual odds of developing any erosions were higher in RF-positives OR 1.28 (95%CI 1.24-1.32) than RF-negatives OR 1.17 (95%CI 1.09-1.26), p 0.013. Time to surgery was similar according to RF-status for the wrist and ankle, but RF-positive cases had a lower hazard of surgery at the elbow (HR 0.37, 0.15-0.90), hip (HR 0.69, 0.48-0.99) and after 10 years at the knee (HR 0.41, 0.25-0.68). Adjustment of the models for Lawrence assessed osteoarthritis of hand and feet radiographs did not influence these results.Figure 1.Odds of progression to any loss of ROM (from no loss of ROM) per year in the overall population and stratified by RF status.Conclusion:Large joints become progressively involved in RA, most frequently affecting the wrist followed by ankle, which is overlooked in some composite disease activity indices. We confirm a higher burden of erosions and damage at the wrists in RF-positive patients, but have not found RF-negative patients to have a better prognosis over time with respect to involvement of other large joints. In contrast RF-negative patients had more joint surgery at the elbow, hip, and knee after 10 years. There is no justification to adopt a less aggressive treatment strategy for RF-negative RA. High vigilance and treat-to-target approaches should be followed irrespective of RF status.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 946.2-947
Author(s):  
C. Duncan ◽  
E. Hunter ◽  
C. Koutsothanasi ◽  
M. Salter ◽  
A. Akoulitchev ◽  
...  

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease with substantial immunopathogenic heterogeneity. It is well established that early diagnosis and initiation of effective therapy is crucial to prevent loss of function. Previously, various RA treatment trajectories have been identified, however there are currently no clinically validated biomarkers that can identify these trajectories at the start of treatment. Evaluation of the structural epigenome has revealed that chromosome conformation signatures (CCS) offer great potential as binary, informative biomarkers, and have been previously shown to predict early RA patient response to Methotrexate with 90% sensitivity (1). These signatures can also reveal highly regulated areas of the genome, which may be underpinning disease endotypes.Objectives:The objective of this study was to evaluate the structural epigenome in early RA over longitudinal samples to determine whether it is associated with treatment trajectories.Methods:Patient data and samples were from the Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA) cohort; a pan-Scotland inception cohort. CDAI, DAS28 ESR and DAS28 CRP measurements were calculated at baseline, 6 months and 12 months to determine longitudinal treatment response. From 3 principal longitudinal response trajectories, 18 patients (who had equivalent disease activity at baseline) were chosen to investigate the structural epigenome. These 18 comprised of responders (R), non-responders (NR) and initial responders (IR; low disease activity/remission at 6 months but moderate/high disease activity at 12 months) with 6 patients per group at each time point. 20 pooled healthy samples were used as a comparator population. EpiSwitch libraries were probed on 180K Agilent SureSelect custom arrays that were designed using EpiSwitch propriety information and publicly available data from Walshet al(2). Microarray data was analysed using the Limma package within R studio.Results:EpiSwitch array analysis showed that there were >10,000 statistically significant differential chromosomal loops between R, NR and IR. Evaluation of the 3 trajectory groups (R, NR and IR), taking into account the healthy chromosomal conformation, revealed an RA-associated structural epigenome that comprised of 10,445 chromosomal loops that were stable, over the three time points. Subsequent analysis of the distinct treatment trajectories demonstrated that 3683 of the stable, disease-associated chromosomal loops were shared by all 3. However, 4496 were associated with distinct response trajectories, with 1221, 2574 and 701 loops unique to R, NR and IR respectively.Conclusion:The stable chromosomal architecture unique to each treatment trajectory suggests that various underlying molecular endotypes may exist. Moreover, the stable loops common to all groups allude to a baseline level of dysregulation in RA and offers the potential to discover novel drivers of disease. This work provides the foundation to further our understanding of RA pathogenesis and the potential of finding a biomarker that would be of significant value in a clinical setting.References:[1] Carini, C., Hunter, E., Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Inception cohort Investigators, Ramadass, A. S., Green, J., Akoulitchev, A., et al. (2018). Chromosome conformation signatures define predictive markers of inadequate response to methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of Translational Medicine,16(1), 18–11[2] Walsh, A. M., Whitaker, J. W., Huang, C. C., Cherkas, Y., Lamberth, S. L., Brodmerkel, C., et al. (2016). Integrative genomic deconvolution of rheumatoid arthritis GWAS loci into gene and cell type associations.Genome Biology,17(1), 2205Disclosure of Interests:Caitlin Duncan: None declared, Ewan Hunter: None declared, Christina Koutsothanasi: None declared, Matthew Salter: None declared, Alexandre Akoulitchev: None declared, Iain McInnes Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Carl Goodyear: None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1115.1-1115
Author(s):  
F. Rahal ◽  
N. Brahumi ◽  
A. Ladjouze-Rezig ◽  
S. Lefkir

Background:Anti-citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (ACPA) are highly specific and sensitive markers for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are also suggested to have a more severe rheumatoid arthritis.Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the influence of ACPA on disease activity, radiological severity, and functional disability in Algerian patient with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods:Consecutive early RA patients (symptom duration ≤24 months) recruited were included in the descriptive, longitudinal, prospective study. Demographic, biological, immunological and radiographic data were collected at the time of inclusion in the study. Disease activity as determined by the Disease Activity Score 28-CPR (DAS28- CPR: 4 variables), functional handicap as calculated by Heath Assessment Score (HAQ), and bone and joint damage as evaluated by Sharp-Van der Heijde (SVDH) erosion and narrowing score.Results:One hundred and sixty-one patients with RA were recruited. Patients mean age 43.71±14 years and mean symptom duration at inclusion was 10.48±7 months. Small and larges were affected in 64,3%. The mean ESR was 23,53±15,2 mm/1st hour, and the mean CRP level was 19,42±39.8 mg/l. Rheumatoid Factors (RFs) and Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies (ACPAs) were present in 74% and 88% of patients, respectively. The presence of ACPAs was significantly associated with DAS28 (p=0,004) and HAQ (p=0,002). There was no significant difference in inflammatory markers and radiographic SVDH score between patients with and without ACPAs. Stepwise regression analysis showed that the presence of ACPAs was independently associated with localization when RA affected smalls and larges joint in the same time (OR=5,24; IC 95% 1,224-22,483; p=0,026).Conclusion:These data show that in patients with early RA, ACPAs positivity was significantly associated with articular manifestations, activity disease and functional handicap, but not with structural damage.References:[1]Nikiphorou E, Norton S, Young A, et al. Association between rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, progression of functional limitation and long-term risk of orthopaedic surgery: combined analysis of two prospective cohorts supports EULAR treat to target DAS thresholds. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(12):2080-2086. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208669.[2]Karimifar M, Salesi M, Farajzadegan Z. The association of anti-CCP1 antibodies with disease activity score 28 (DAS-28) in rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:30. doi:10.4103/2277-9175.98156.[3]Boman A, Brink M, Lundquist A, et al. Antibodies against citrullinated peptides are associated with clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective longitudinal inception cohort study. RMD Open. 2019;5(2):e000946. Published 2019 Sep 3. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000946.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document