scholarly journals AB0417 Efficacy and safety of methotrexate and leflunomide as a combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity presenting at a tertiary care setting in pakistan

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Salim ◽  
S Samreen ◽  
A Nasim ◽  
H Gul ◽  
A Masood
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
High Disease Activity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Tertiary Care Setting

scholarly journals The first experience of using upadacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice (results of the multicenter project “RACURS”)

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 571-577
Author(s):  
V. N. Amirjanova ◽  
A. E. Karateev ◽  
E. Y. Pogozheva ◽  
A. A. Baranov ◽  
V. I. Mazurov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Functional State ◽  
High Disease Activity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Previous Therapy ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Upadacitinib (UPA), a JAK inhibitor, is a new therapeutic option that allows patients with insufficient response to therapy with basic anti-inflammatory drugs (DMARDs) or genetically engineered biological drugs (GEBDs) to achieve the goals of therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite the availability of convincing data from international randomized clinical trials, there is insufficient information about the efficacy and safety profile of UPA, the quality of life of patients receiving the drug in real clinical practice.Aim of the study – to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the UPA drug at a dose of 15 mg/day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with moderate and high disease activity and to assess their quality of life in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. The study included 41 patients with RA with insufficient effect of previous therapy with DMARDs or GEBDs, persisting moderate or high disease activity, who were initiated with UPA therapy in 7 rheumatological centers of the Russian Federation. To assess the activity of the disease, standard indices were used: DAS28- ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, CDAI. Functional ability was assessed according to the HAQ questionnaire, quality of life – according to the EQ-5D questionnaire, the activity of the disease according to the patient’s opinion – according to the RAPID-3 index. The HADS scale was used to identify the states of depression, anxiety and emotional disorder.Results. During the first week of taking the drug, there was a marked decrease in pain from 60 to 30 mm on a visual analogue scale, which lasted until the third month of therapy. There was a statistically significant decrease in morning stiffness, the number of painful and swollen joints, health assessments by the doctor and patient, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (p≤0.001). A decrease in disease activity was also noted according to the dynamics of the activity indices DAS28, SDAI, CDAI (p<0.001). The goals of therapy (remission or low disease activity) by the 3rd month of therapy according to the combined indices of activity DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP reached 44.8 and 63.4% of patients, respectively, according to the SDAI index – 56.7%, according to the CDAI index – 25.9%. A pronounced improvement in joint function (70% improvement according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology) was noted by 33.3% of patients, population indicators of functional state (HAQ≤0.5) had 15.8% of patients. The difference in the HAQ index by the 3rd month of therapy compared to the indicator before treatment was –0.60 points. The quality of life, assessed by patients using the EQ-5D questionnaire, improved in 98.5% of patients, with a 70% improvement noted in more than a third of them (41.7%). The drug was well tolerated, no adverse reactions were registered by the 3rd month of therapy, all patients continued treatment.Conclusions. The first results of the use of UPA in RA patients with insufficient efficacy of previous therapy with DMARDs or GEBDs in real clinical practice indicate its efficacy and safety, an improvement in the functional state and quality of life of patients by the 12th week of the study.

scholarly journals POS0305 PHYSICIAN AND PATIENT ATTITUDES TOWARDS TREAT-TO-TARGET, ITS IMPLEMENTATION AND STATED TREATMENT GOALS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING ACROSS EUROPE

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 378-379
Author(s):  
B. Fautrel ◽  
R. Caporali ◽  
E. Holdsworth ◽  
B. Donaghy ◽  
M. Khalid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
High Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical State ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Treatment Goals ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Reduction Of Pain

Background:The principles of treat to target (T2T) include defining an appropriate treatment target, assessed at pre-defined intervals, with a commitment to changing therapeutic approach if the target is not met (1). T2T is recommended as a key strategy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Objectives:To explore attitudes towards T2T, its implementation and stated treatment goals among physicians and their patients with RA.Methods:The Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™ was a large, quantitative, point-in-time survey conducted amongst rheumatologists (n=296) and their consulting patients with RA (n=3042) in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) between Q4 2019–Q3 2020. Physicians were recruited via publicly available lists, completing an online survey and medical record extraction for their next 10–12 consecutive patients. The same patients were invited to voluntarily complete a self-report questionnaire (n=1098, 36% response), collecting data on attitudes towards T2T and treatment goals.Results:Physicians reported that 76% of patients were in remission (DAS28: <2.6) or had low disease activity (DAS28: 2.6 – 3.2), and 24% had moderate-high disease activity (DAS28: >3.2). Patient mean age was 53.0 years (SD 14.0), mean time since diagnosis was 7.2 years (SD 7.2). The proportion of patients currently receiving an advanced therapy (AT; defined as biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD) was 68%, of whom 70% were on a first line AT. No difference was observed between disease activity groups.In the physician survey, 86% of physicians stated they followed T2T principals in at least some of their RA patients, and would utilize a T2T approach in RA patients with moderate-high disease activity (61%), the most uncontrolled patients (37%) and those who do not respond well to initial therapy (34%). In this sample of real-world RA patients, 66% were reported by physicians to be on a T2T plan at the time of data collection. The most common physician-reported targets were remission (DAS28: <2.6) (75%), improvement of quality of life (QoL) (41%) and reduction of pain (31%), with 85% of physicians perceiving these treatment goals were fully or partially met. The most stated reasons for not implementing T2T was physician preference not to adjust current treatment (34%), patient preference not to adjust current treatment (23%), and there are no achievable goals for this patient (16%).Overall, 29% of patients reported they were involved in setting their T2T goals, while 34% stated their T2T goals were set by their physicians only, and 29% perceived no T2T goal had been set (n=620). The most common overall T2T goals from the patient perspective were remission (61%), controlling symptoms (41%), and reducing impact on QoL (34%). Of those patients who acknowledged a T2T goal had been set (n=407), 77% reported their T2T goal was fully or partially achieved.Of 719 patients who had moderate-high disease activity, 57% were on a T2T plan, with 46% of physicians perceiving these treatment goals were fully or partially met. The most common physician-stated reason for not implementing T2T was a lack of achievable targets (29%).Conclusion:Rheumatologists in this study reported a strong belief in T2T. The most common physician-set T2T goals were remission, improvement of QoL and reduction of pain, corresponding with T2T goals as reported by patients. However, a third of patients in this cohort were not aware of a defined T2T objective in their management, which may be a result of a perceived lack of achievable goals by physicians. It may be desirable to promote more patient involvement in defining achievable targets amongst those with moderate-high disease activity who despite best efforts may not reach a clinical state of remission. Further research is needed to identify and understand goals important to RA patients.References:[1]van Vollenhoven R. Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis - are we there yet? Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(3):180-6.Acknowledgements:This study was funded by Galapagos NV, Belgium.Medical writing support was provided by Gary Sidgwick, PhD (Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK) and editorial support was provided by Debbie Sherwood, BSc, CMPP (Aspire Scientific, Bollington, UK), both funded by Galapagos NV.Disclosure of Interests:Bruno Fautrel Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, NORDIC Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Sanofi, Fresenius Kabi, Samsung Bioepis, MSD, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Elizabeth Holdsworth Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Bethany Donaghy Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Mona Khalid Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Mark Moore Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Speakers bureau: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Paid instructor for: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Consultant of: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Employee of: Gilead Sciences, and previously Sanofi and AstraZeneca, Katrien Van Beneden Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Yves Piette Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Grünenthal and Sandoz, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Mylan and UCB, Susana Romero-Yuste Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Grunenthal, Kern Pharma, Lilly, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Janssen, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gebro, Janssen, Lilly, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Jasper Broen Shareholder of: Pharming Group, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Peter C. Taylor Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Nordic Pharma, Fresenius, UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly

scholarly journals Erratum: Salmonella blood stream infections in a tertiary care setting in Ghana

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Appiah-Korang Labi ◽  
Noah Obeng-Nkrumah ◽  
Naa Addison ◽  
Eric S. Donkor
Keyword(s):  
Care Setting ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Blood Stream Infections ◽  
Tertiary Care Setting

scholarly journals Olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin 6, in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by methotrexate: efficacy and safety results of a randomised controlled phase III study

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-219876
Author(s):  
Evgeniy Nasonov ◽  
Saeed Fatenejad ◽  
Eugen Feist ◽  
Mariana Ivanova ◽  
Elena Korneva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsIn this 24-week multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneously administered OKZ 64 mg once every 2 weeks, OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks, or placebo plus MTX. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12. The secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage of subjects achieving Disease Activity Score 28-joint count based on C reactive protein <3.2, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 12, ACR50 response and Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤2.8 at week 24. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the study.ResultsA total of 428 patients were randomised. ACR20 responses were more frequent with OKZ every 2 weeks (63.6%) and OKZ every 4 weeks (70.4%) than placebo (25.9%) (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). There were significant differences in all secondary efficacy endpoints between OKZ-treated arms and placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported by more patients in the OKZ groups compared with placebo. Infections were the most common TESAEs. No subjects developed neutralising antidrug antibodies.ConclusionsTreatment with OKZ was associated with significant improvement in signs, symptoms and physical function of rheumatoid arthritis without discernible differences between the two regimens. Safety was as expected for this class of agents. Low immunogenicity was observed.Trial registration numberNCT02760368.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document