scholarly journals Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials

1997 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. W Koes ◽  
R. J P M Scholten ◽  
J. M A Mens ◽  
L. M Bouter
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

scholarly journals EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE THERAPY (ESWT) IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Karolina Walewicz
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Shock Wave Therapy ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave

Background: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) has become a popular tool to treat musculoskeletal disorders and chronic low back pain. Aim of the study: To review the current scientific literature and assess the utility of ESWT in treating chronic low back pain. Methods: This systematic review was conducted from November 2019 to January 2020. Its purpose was to determine what the effectiveness is of the various forms of ESWT for the treatment of chronic low back pain. The critical review of the literature on the use of ESWT in chronic low back was made using the scientifically recognized medical databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Web of Science Core Collection. There was no restriction by date. Exclusion criteria were experimental, in vitro, animal, review, case reports, non-randomized clinical trials or studies with healthy participants. All articles written in languages other than English have also been excluded. Results: Six studies were included in the final analysis. According to the applied PEDro classification, the average scoring for the studies was 4.83, which indicates overall low quality of the presented reports. However, this result appeared closer to the moderate (acceptable) quality range (6-8 points) than to the unacceptable range (0-2 points). Conclusion: Based on the findings in the analyzed articles, ESWT promises to be an efficient and useful procedure in chronic low back pain treatment. Unfortunately, the level of evidence is relatively weak because there are a limited number of published studies related to ESWT and the final score in the PEDro classification was low. Together, these results indicate the need for further high quality randomized clinical trials.

scholarly journals Are Older Adults Missing From Low Back Pain Clinical Trials? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1220-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatjana Paeck ◽  
Manuela L. Ferreira ◽  
Clive Sun ◽  
Chung-Wei Christine Lin ◽  
Anne Tiedemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Back

scholarly journals Effectiveness of ozone therapy compared to other therapies for low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Ribeiro de Andrade ◽  
Olavo Barbosa de Oliveira-Neto ◽  
Luciano Timbó Barbosa ◽  
Isabelle Oliveira Santos ◽  
Célio Fernando de Sousa-Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Ozone Therapy

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Who Used versus Did Not Use Concomitant Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs or Acetaminophen: A Post Hoc Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Skljarevski ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Shuyu Zhang ◽  
Jonna Ahl ◽  
James M. Martinez
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Substantial Evidence ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Post Hoc

This subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy of duloxetine in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who did or did not use concomitant nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or acetaminophen (APAP). Data were pooled from two 13-week randomized trials in patients with CLBP who were stratified according to NSAID/APAP use at baseline: duloxetine NSAID/APAP user (), placebo NSAID/APAP user (), duloxetine NSAID/APAP nonuser (), and placebo NSAID/APAP nonuser (). NSAID/APAP users were those patients who took NSAID/APAP for at least 14 days per month during 3 months prior to study entry. An analysis of covariance model that included therapy, study, baseline NSAID/APAP use (yes/no), and therapy-by-NSAID/APAP subgroup interaction was used to assess the efficacy. The treatment-by-NSAID/APAP use interaction was not statistically significant () suggesting no substantial evidence of differential efficacy for duloxetine over placebo on pain reduction or improvement in physical function between concomitant NSAID/APAP users and non-users.

scholarly journals Randomized Clinical Trials on Acupuncture in Korean Literature: A Systematic Review

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Cheol Kong ◽  
Myeong Soo Lee ◽  
Byung-Cheul Shin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Premenstrual Syndrome ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Korean Literature

The aim of this systematic review was to summarize randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture as published in Korean literature. Systematic searches were conducted on eight Korean medical databases. Manual searches were also conducted through eight major Korean medical journals. The methodological quality was assessed using a Jadad score. Studies evaluating needle acupuncture or auricular acupuncture (AA) with or without electrical stimulation were considered if they were sham or placebo-controlled or controlled against a comparative intervention. We also excluded acupuncture as an adjuvant to other treatments and other forms of acupuncture were excluded. Seven hundred and nine possibly relevant studies were identified and 10 RCTs were included. The methodological quality of the trials was generally poor. Manual acupuncture was compared to placebo acupuncture in four studies of patients with chronic low back pain, shoulder pain, premenstrual syndrome and allergic rhinitis. Three studies tested AA (two trials) and electroacupuncture (one trial) against no treatment, while three trials compared acupuncture with other active therapeutic controls. The methodological limitations of the included trials make their contribution to the current clinical evidence of acupuncture somewhat limited. The trial for premenstrual syndrome, shoulder pain and chronic low back pain added a limited contribution among those included RCTs. However, well-designed RCTs of acupuncture with a rigorous methodology are in progress or have been completed in Korea and will contribute to establish or contribute to the current progress of research in this field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document