Application of pie-crusting technique to facilitate closure of open abdomen after decompressive laparotomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e244219
Author(s):  
Thomas J Martin ◽  
Tareq Kheirbek
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Pressure Therapy ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Decompressive Laparotomy ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Grafting

We present the case of a 23-year-old man who developed abdominal compartment syndrome secondary to severe pancreatitis and required decompressive laparotomy and pancreatic necrosectomy. Despite application of a temporary abdominal closure system (ABThera Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Therapy), extensive retroperitoneal oedema and inflammation continued to contribute to loss of domain and prevented primary closure of the skin and fascia. The usual course of action would have involved reapplication of ABThera system until primary closure could be achieved or sufficient granulation tissue permitted split-thickness skin grafting. Though a safe option for abdominal closure, application of a skin graft would delay return to baseline functional status and require eventual graft excision with abdominal wall reconstruction for this active labourer. Thus, we achieved primary closure of the skin through the novel application of abdominal wall ‘pie-crusting’, or tension-releasing multiple skin incisions, technique.

Temporary abdominal closure followed by definitive abdominal wall reconstruction of the open abdomen

2004 ◽  
Vol 188 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Howdieshell ◽  
Charles D. Proctor ◽  
Erez Sternberg ◽  
Jorge I. Cué ◽  
J.Sheppard Mondy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Abdominal Closure

scholarly journals Management of the Open Abdomen

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (03) ◽  
pp. 127-132
Author(s):  
Alexander Mericli
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Plastic Surgeon ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Clinical Scenario ◽  
Surgical Team ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
The Creation

AbstractManagement of the abdominal catastrophe requires a multidisciplinary approach. The plastic surgeon is a key member of the surgical team assisting in the creation of a durable, functional anatomic abdominal wall reconstruction. Plastic surgeons must be familiar with the concepts and pathophysiology related to the open abdomen, techniques for temporary abdominal closure, and when such techniques are appropriate to implement. In this article, the authors provide a review of the open abdomen concept, which practicing plastic surgeons and trainees may find helpful if faced with this clinical scenario.

An Innovative Way to Separate Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction after Complex Abdominal Trauma

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. 1001-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Livingston ◽  
David V. Feliciano
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Skin Grafting ◽  
Small Bowel Resection ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Thickness Skin ◽  
Split Thickness Skin Grafting ◽  
Staged Approach ◽  
Level I

Despite advances in trauma care, a subset of patients surviving damage control cannot achieve fascial closure and require split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) of their open abdomen. Controversy exists as to whether reconstruction of the gastrointestine (GI) should be staged or performed at the time of abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Many surgeons do not believe that operations through the STSG can be completed safely or without loss of graft. This series reviews the outcomes of operations for GI reconstruction performed through the elevated healed STSG. Concurrent series on all patients undergoing abdominal operation through the STSG. The technique involves elevating the STSG, lysing adhesions only as needed, avoid detaching underlying omentum or viscera to avoid devascularization, and then reattaching the elevated STSG to the abdominal wall with simple sutures. From 1995 to 2017, 27 patients underwent 40 distinct procedures during 36 separate abdominal reoperations (89% GI) through the elevated STSG approach at three Level I trauma centers at a mean interval of 11 months from application of the STSG. One STSG was lost (patient closed with skin flaps), one patient had 30 per cent loss of the STSG (regrafted), and one patient had 10 per cent loss of the STSG (allowed to granulate). One patient required a small bowel resection for intraoperative enterotomy during a difficult operative dissection. There were no GI complications, intraabdominal infections, or deaths, and all patients were deemed fit to undergo AWR after three months. Major intraabdominal reoperations can be readily and safely accomplished through the elevated STSG approach with a <4 per cent need for regrafting. This staged approach significantly simplifies and increases the safety of a second stage AWR.

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction After Temporary Abdominal Closure: A Ten-Year Review

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Joels ◽  
Andrew S. Vanderveer ◽  
William L. Newcomb ◽  
Amy E. Lincourt ◽  
John L. Polhill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Abdominal Closure

scholarly journals Successful Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Necrosis Caused by a Perforated Ascending Colon Using the ABThera System

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kouki Imaoka ◽  
Takuya Yano ◽  
Yasuhiro Choda ◽  
Ko Oshita ◽  
Yuma Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Anterolateral Thigh Flap ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Ascending Colon ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Pressure Therapy ◽  
New Device

Background. The practice of leaving the abdomen open after an emergency laparotomy has gained increasing popularity recently. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is known as an effective technique in the management of an open abdomen (OA). A new device, the ABThera™ Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Therapy System (KCI USA, San Antonio, TX, USA), was specifically designed to achieve a temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in the management of an OA. This study was aimed at presenting a successful experience of treating a case of abdominal wall necrosis caused by a perforated ascending colon using the ABThera System. Case Presentation. A 66-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with complaints of severe pain in the abdomen. On admission, abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed fluid collection, an air pocket in the subcutaneous fat layer of the abdominal wall, and edematous changes in the adipose tissue in the peritoneum and abdominal wall. Based on a diagnosis of peritonitis resulting from a perforated ascending colon, emergency surgery was performed. A right hemicolectomy, ileostomy construction, and debridement of the necrotic tissues were performed. However, necrotizing fasciitis rapidly spread; therefore, more necrotic tissue was debrided in a second operation. The abdominal wall defect was left open, and the ABThera System was used in the management of the OA; this device promoted wound healing. A reduction was observed in the size of the open wound with visible granulation tissue. The defect was finally covered with a mesh split-thickness skin graft and anterolateral thigh flap. Conclusions. In the management of a case of a massive wound with infection, it can be of great benefit to treat the wound with NPWT initially to decrease its size. The ABThera System could facilitate early and safe management of an OA by surgeons.

Should Negative Pressure Therapy Replace Any Other Temporary Abdominal Closure Device in Open-Abdomen Management of Secondary Peritonitis?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Pappalardo ◽  
Stefano Rausei ◽  
Vincenzo Ardita ◽  
Luigi Boni ◽  
Gianlorenzo Dionigi
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Secondary Peritonitis ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Negative Pressure Therapy ◽  
Pressure Therapy ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Primary Fascial Closure

AIM: To clarify the advantages of negative pressure therapy (NPT) compared to other methods of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in the management of secondary peritonitis. METHODS: We retraced the history of known methods of TAC, and analyzed their advantages and disadvantages. We evaluated as the NPT mechanisms, both from the macroscopic that bio-molecular point of view, well suits to manage this difficult condition. RESULTS: The ideal TAC technique should be quick to apply, easy to change, protect and contain the abdominal viscera, decrease bowel edema, prevent loss of domain and abdominal compartment syndrome, limit contamination, allow egress of peritoneal fluid (and its estimation) and not result in adhesions. It should also be cost-effective, minimize the number of dressing changes and the number of surgical revisions, and ensure a high rate of early closure with a low rate of complications (especially entero-atmospheric fistula). For NPT, the reported fistula rate is 7%, primary fascial closure ranges from 33 to 100% (average 60%) and the mortality rate is about 20%. With the use of NPT as TAC, it may be possible to extend the window of time to achieve primary fascial closure (for up to 20-40 days). CONCLUSION: NPT has several potential advantages in open-abdomen (OA) management of secondary peritonitis and may make it possible to achieve all the goals suggested above for an ideal TAC system. Only trained staff should use NPT, following the manufacturer’s instructions when commercial products are used. Even if there was a significant evolution in OA management, we believe that further research into the role of NPT for secondary peritonitis is necessary.

scholarly journals Standard Urine Collection Bag as an Improvised Bogotá Bag as a Temporary Abdominal Closure Method in an Open Abdomen in Preventing Abdominal Compartment Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Ahmed Shabhay ◽  
Zarina Shabhay ◽  
Kondo Chilonga ◽  
David Msuya ◽  
Theresia Mwakyembe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Anterior Abdominal Wall ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Urine Collection ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Closure Method ◽  
Abdominal Compartment

Primary abdominal wall closure post laparotomy is not always possible. Certain surgical pathologies such as degloving anterior abdominal wall trauma injuries and peritoneal visceral volume and cavity disproportion render it nearly impossible for the attending surgeon to close the abdomen in the first initial laparotomy. In such surgical clinical scenarios leaving the abdomen open might be lifesaving. Forceful closure might lead to abdominal compartment syndrome and impair respiratory status of the patient. Open abdomen closure techniques have evolved over time from protection of abdominal viscera to complex fascia retraction prevention techniques. Silo bags, i.e., (Bogotá Bags), are relatively cheap, available materials used as a temporary abdominal closure method in limited resources settings. Despite its limitations of not preventing fascia retraction and draining of peritoneal fluid, it protects the abdominal viscera. We report a case of a 29-year-old male who developed incisional anterior abdominal wall wound dehiscence. He was scheduled for emergency explorative laparotomy. Intraoperatively, multiple attempts to reduce grossly dilated edematous bowels into the peritoneal cavity and fascia approximation into the midline were not possible. A urinary collection bag was sutured on the skin edges as a temporary abdominal closure method in prevention of abdominal compartment syndrome. He fared well postoperatively and eventually underwent abdominal incisional wound closure. In emergency abdominal surgeries done in limited surgical material resource settings were primary abdominal closure is not possible at initial laparotomy, sterile urine collection bags as alternatives to the standard Bogota bags as temporary abdominal closure materials can be safely used. These are relatively easily available and can be safely used until definite surgical intervention is achieved with relatively fewer complications.

Open Abdomen Treatment for Septic Patients with Gastrointestinal Fistula: From Fistula Control to Definitive Closure

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianan Ren ◽  
Yujie Yuan ◽  
Yunzhao Zhao ◽  
Guosheng Gu ◽  
Gefei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Temporary Abdominal Closure ◽  
Gastrointestinal Fistula ◽  
Operative Strategy ◽  
Abdominal Infection ◽  
Abdominal Closure ◽  
Intra Abdominal Infection

The use of open abdomen in the management of gastrointestinal fistula complicated with severe intra-abdominal infection is uncommon. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of our staged approach for the infected open abdomen. Patients who had gastrointestinal fistula and underwent open abdomen treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Various materials such as polypropylene mesh and a modified sandwich package were used to achieve temporary abdominal closure followed by skin grafting when the granulation bed matured. A delayed definitive operation was performed for final abdominal closure without implant of prosthetic mesh. Between 1999 and 2009, 56 (68.3%) of 82 patients survived through this treatment. Among them, 42 patients achieved final abdominal closure. Spontaneous fistula closure occurred in 16 patients with secondary fistula recorded in six patients. Besides, wound complications occurred in 13 patients with two cases for pulmonary infection. Within a 12-month follow-up period after definitive closure, no additional fistula was recorded excluding planned ventral hernia repair. Open abdomen treatment was effective for gastrointestinal fistula complicated by severe intra-abdominal infection. A delayed and deliberate operative strategy aiming at fistula excision and fascial closure, with simultaneous abdominal wall reconstruction, was required for the infected open abdomen.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of an Antibiotic-Coated Non–Cross-linked Porcine Acellular Dermal Graft for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction for High-Risk and Contaminated Wounds

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110233
Author(s):  
Jordan Robinson ◽  
Jesse K. Sulzer ◽  
Benjamin Motz ◽  
Erin H. Baker ◽  
John B. Martinie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Open Abdomen ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Dermal Graft ◽  
Elective Repair ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Background Abdominal wall reconstruction in high-risk and contaminated cases remains a challenging surgical dilemma. We report long-term clinical outcomes for a rifampin-/minocycline-coated acellular dermal graft (XenMatrix™ AB) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction for patients with a prior open abdomen or contaminated wounds. Methods Patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction at our institution at high risk for surgical site occurrence and reconstructed with XenMatrix™ AB with intent-to-treat between 2014 and 2017 were included. Demographics, operative characteristics, and outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was hernia recurrence. The secondary outcomes included length of stay, surgical site occurrence, readmission, morbidity, and mortality. Results Twenty-two patients underwent abdominal wall reconstruction using XenMatrix™ AB during the study period. Two patients died while inpatient from progression of their comorbid diseases and were excluded. Sixty percent of patients had an open abdomen at the time of repair. All patients were from modified Ventral Hernia Working Group class 2 or 3. There were a total of four 30-day infectious complications including superficial cellulitis/fat necrosis (15%) and one intraperitoneal abscess (5%). No patients required reoperation or graft excision. Median clinical follow-up was 38.2 months with a mean of 35.2 +/− 18.5 months. Two asymptomatic recurrences and one symptomatic recurrence were noted during this period with one planning for elective repair of an eventration. Follow-up was extended by phone interview which identified no additional recurrences at a median of 45.5 and mean of 50.5 +/−12.7 months. Conclusion We present long-term outcomes for patients with high-risk and contaminated wounds who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction reinforced with XenMatrix™ AB to achieve early, permanent abdominal closure. Acceptable outcomes were noted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document