scholarly journals Retinoblastoma patients with high risk ocular pathological features: who needs adjuvant therapy?

2004 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 1069-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
G L Chantada
2018 ◽  
Vol 199 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Lenis ◽  
Nicholas M. Donin ◽  
David C. Johnson ◽  
Izak Faiena ◽  
Amirali Salmasi ◽  
...  

Oral Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav S. Ajmani ◽  
Cheryl C. Nocon ◽  
Chi-Hsiung Wang ◽  
Mihir K. Bhayani

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sharma ◽  
C. Tajzler ◽  
A. Kapoor

BackgroundAlthough surgical resection remains the standard of care for localized kidney cancers, a significant proportion of patients experience systemic recurrence after surgery and hence might benefit from effective adjuvant therapy. So far, several treatment options have been evaluated in adjuvant clinical trials, but only a few have provided promising results. Nevertheless, with the recent development of targeted therapy and immunomodulatory therapy, a series of clinical trials are in progress to evaluate the potential of those novel agents in the adjuvant setting. In this paper, we provide a narrative review of the progress in this field, and we summarize the results from recent adjuvant trials that have been completed.MethodsA literature search was conducted. The primary search strategy at the medline, Cochrane reviews, and http://ClinicalTrials.gov/ databases included the keywords “adjuvant therapy,” “renal cell carcinoma,” and “targeted therapy or/and immunotherapy.”ConclusionsData from the s-trac study indicated that, in the “highest risk for recurrence” patient population, disease-free survival was increased with the use of adjuvant sunitinib compared with placebo. The assure trial showed no benefit for adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib in the “intermediate- to high-risk” patient population. The ariser (adjuvant girentuximab) and protect (adjuvant pazopanib) trials indicated no survival benefit, but subgroup analyses in both trials recommended further investigation. The inconsistency in some of the current results can be attributed to a variety of factors pertaining to the lack of standardization across the trials. Nevertheless, patients in the “high risk of recurrence” category after surgery for their disease would benefit from a discussion about the potential benefits of adjuvant treatment and enrolment in ongoing adjuvant trials.


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 2153-2158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunyan Du ◽  
Ye Zhou ◽  
Kai Huang ◽  
Guangfa Zhao ◽  
Hong Fu ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taymaa May ◽  
Melina Shoni ◽  
Allison F. Vitonis ◽  
Charles M. Quick ◽  
Whitfield B. Growdon ◽  
...  

Objectives. To characterize clinical outcomes in patients with intermediate or high-risk endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgical staging with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy.Methods. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with intermediate or high-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical staging with (PPALN group) or without (PLN) para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Data were collected, Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and univariate and multivariate analyses performed to compare differences in adjuvant therapy, disease recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).Results.118 patients were included in the PPALN group and 139 in the PLN group. Patients in the PPALN group were more likely to receive adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (25.4% versus 11.5%,OR=2.5,P=0.03) and less likely to receive adjuvant multimodal combination therapy (17.81% versus 28.8%,OR=0.28,P=0.002). DFS was improved in the PLN group as compared to PPALN (80% versus 62%,P=0.02). OS was equivalent (P=0.93). Patients in the PPALN group who had less than 10 para-aortic nodes removed were twice as likely to recur than patients who had 10 or more para-aortic nodes or patients in the PLN group (HR 2.08, CI 1.20–3.60,P=0.009).Conclusions. Patients in the PLN group were more likely to receive multimodal adjuvant therapy and had better DFS than the PPALN group. Pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy may represent an effective treatment option for patients with intermediate or high-risk disease. If systematic para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed and less than 10 para-aortic lymph nodes are obtained, multimodality adjuvant therapy should be considered to improve DFS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document