scholarly journals National reporting system for medical errors is launched

BMJ ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 328 (7438) ◽  
pp. 481.1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittal Katikireddi
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Rahman ◽  
Alan Hales ◽  
Ryan Beegan ◽  
David Cable ◽  
David Rew

Abstract Background Many surgeons work within multidisciplinary cancer teams. The Somerset Cancer Register (SCR) is a national reporting system for service performance which is in use in more than 100 NHS Trusts. However, the core system has not yet been optimised for MDT users or for the surfacing of clinical data for research and other uses. Methods SCR replaced our legacy cancer reporting system in 2014. Working with the SCR developers, we integrated our cellular pathology and imaging records with the SCR MDT outputs. We subsequently developed SCR+ to optimise workflows for MDT coordinators and information presentation to clinical users.    Results Our HTML-enabled SCR+ software application displays all cancer patients by pathological type and year of presentation on dynamic histograms, for ease of visualisation and interaction. Every selected case is displayed in list order for each and every MDT meeting, with a fast hyperlink to our integral Lifelines EPR interface, to electronic pathology records back to 1990, and to our Breast Cancer Data System for relevant patients. Conclusions The SCR+ module transforms the access and visualisation of cancer workload across our Trust for all authorised MDT users, with appropriate data security. The agile programming methodology allowed us to build a sustainable cancer data system with further development potential. The product substantially enhances user experience, data recall and productivity over legacy systems. Close cooperation between clinically proficient  IT teams and clinicians as the end consumers of digital health data systems yields significant operational benefits at pace and with very modest costs.  


2013 ◽  
Vol 103 (11) ◽  
pp. 1989-1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Marucci-Wellman ◽  
David H. Wegman ◽  
Tom B. Leamon ◽  
Ta Thi Tuyet Binh ◽  
Nguyen Bich Diep ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 541-546
Author(s):  
Razieh Sadat Mousavi-roknabadi ◽  
Marzieh Momennasab ◽  
Mehrdad Askarian ◽  
Abbas Haghshenas ◽  
Brahmaputra Marjadi

Abstract Objectives To explore the causes of medical errors (ME) and under-reporting amongst pediatric nurses at an Iranian teaching hospital. Design A qualitative study, based on individual, in-depth, semi-structured interviews and content analysis approach. Settings The study was conducted at the Pediatric Department of the largest tertiary general and teaching hospital in Shiraz, southern Iran. Participants The study population was all pediatrics nurses who work at Pediatric Department and they had been trained on ME, as well as methods to report them through the hospital’s ME reporting system. Purposive sampling was used by selecting key informants until data saturation was achieved and no more new information was obtained. Finally, 18 pediatric nurses were interviewed. Main outcome measure(s) Pediatrics nurses’ views on the causes of ME and under-reporting. Results We found five main factors causing ME and under-reporting: personal factors, workplace factors, managerial factors, work culture and error reporting system. These factors were further classified into proximal and distal factors. Proximal factors had direct relationship with ME and distal factors were contextual factors. Conclusion Causes of ME and under-reporting amongst pediatric nurses are complex and intertwined. Both proximal and distal factors need to be simultaneously addressed using context-specific approaches. Further research on other groups of healthcare workers and using a quantitative approach will be beneficial to elucidate the most appropriate interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document