scholarly journals Cross-border healthcare in the European Union: clarifying patients' rights

BMJ ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 342 (jan17 2) ◽  
pp. d296-d296 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Legido-Quigley ◽  
I. Passarani ◽  
C. Knai ◽  
R. Busse ◽  
W. Palm ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-159
Author(s):  
Zuzana Nordeng ◽  
Frode Veggeland

AbstractThis article studies the implementation of the European Union (EU)’s Patients’ Rights Directive in Germany and Norway. The objective of the Directive was to allow EU member states to have a say in the regulatory work, ensure predictability and uniformity in the application of EU rules on cross-border care, and enhance a move towards EU harmonisation in this area. So far, the implementation processes in Norway and Germany have mixed results regarding the likelihood of achieving uniformity and harmonisation. Although the Directive has had convergent effects on certain areas of cross-border care, such as setting up National Contact Points and providing patients with the basic right to treatment abroad, implementation also shows divergent patterns. In both countries, adapting to EU rules has strengthened patients’ rights to choose freely among health-service providers in a wider European health-service market. However, due to legal discretion and country-specific institutions within which the new rules are applied, divergent patterns prevail.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-522
Author(s):  
Vicki Paskalia

Abstract In March 2011, a new Directive was adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Directive 2011/24, on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare, the primary purpose of which has been to facilitate access to healthcare across national borders. Healthcare safety and the availability of legal remedies in cases of harm are important parameters of quality healthcare and important patients’ rights in modern healthcare systems, and they are therefore important issues in a context of cross-border patient mobility. The aim of this article is to shed some light on the provisions of the Healthcare Directive in relation to the issue of legal remedies in cases of harm. It is argued that the current legal state should be considered unsatisfactory, problematic and in need of more clarity and even harmonisation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (Vol 18, No 4 (2019)) ◽  
pp. 439-453
Author(s):  
Ihor LISHCHYNSKYY

The article is devoted to the study of the implementation of territorial cohesion policy in the European Union in order to achieve a secure regional coexistence. In particular, the regulatory and institutional origins of territorial cohesion policy in the EU are considered. The evolution of ontological models of cohesion policy has been outlined. Specifically, the emphasis is placed on the key objective of political geography – effectively combining the need for "territorialization" and the growing importance of networking. The role of urbanization processes in the context of cohesion policy is highlighted. Cross-border dimensions of cohesion policy in the context of interregional cooperation are explored. Particular emphasis is placed on the features of integrated sustainable development strategies.


2016 ◽  
pp. 107-122
Author(s):  
Agata Michalska-Olek

The article aims to show the possible ways of judicial redress for claims resulting from sales of goods especially including the issue of jurisdiction and application of the provisions of national law or the provisions of Community law. In the article the provisions of the Convention of 30 October 2007 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters as well as the provisions of regulations of the European Parliament and of the Council were widely discussed. The author discusses in particular the issue related to cross-border contracts for the sales-of-goods within the European Union. Part of the deliberations concerns judicial rulings, in particular judicial decisions issued in cases in which the court shall consider the issue of jurisdiction of its own motion. In the conclusion of the article it is stated that the choice between the national jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of other states will depend on the terms of agreement between the parties as well as the documents related to the transaction, in particular consignment notes (CMR), and the EXW clauses – such a formulation means that the parties agreed to the way of delivery of goods according to the commercial (Incoterms) clauses, determining in such a way the issue of jurisdiction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document