scholarly journals Local ownership of health policy and systems research in low-income and middle-income countries: a missing element in the uptake debate

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e001523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kudakwashe Paul Vanyoro ◽  
Kate Hawkins ◽  
Matthew Greenall ◽  
Helen Parry ◽  
Lynda Keeru
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Health Policy And Systems

Health policy and systems researchers (HPSRs) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) aim to influence health systems planning, costing, policy and implementation. Yet, there is still much that we do not know about the types of health systems evidence that are most compelling and impactful to policymakers and community groups, the factors that facilitate the research to decision-making process and the real-world challenges faced when translating research findings into practice in different contexts. Drawing on an analysis of HPSR from LMICs presented at the Fifth Global Symposium on Health Systems Research (HSR 2018), we argue that while there is a recognition in policy studies more broadly about the role of co-production, collective ownership and the value of localised HPSR in the evidence-to-policy discussion, ‘ownership’ of research at country level is a research uptake catalyst that needs to be further emphasised, particularly in the HPSR context. We consider embedded research, participatory or community-initiated research and emergent/responsive research processes, all of which are ‘owned’ by policymakers, healthcare practitioners/managers or community members. We embrace the view that ownership of HPSR by people directly affected by health problems connects research and decision-making in a tangible way, creating pathways to impact.

Systems Thinking Analyses for Health Policy and Systems Development

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Systems Thinking ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Systems Development ◽  
Previous Scholarship ◽  
Health Policy And Systems

Health systems are fluid and their components are interdependent in complex ways. Policymakers, academics and students continually endeavour to understand how to manage health systems to improve the health of populations. However, previous scholarship has often failed to engage with the intersections and interactions of health with a multitude of other systems and determinants. This book ambitiously takes on the challenge of presenting health systems as a coherent whole, by applying a systems-thinking lens. It focuses on Malaysia as a case study to demonstrate the evolution of a health system from a low-income developing status to one of the most resilient health systems today. A rich collaboration of multidisciplinary academics working with policymakers who were at the coalface of decision-making and practitioners with decades of experience, provides a candid analysis of what worked and what did not. The result is an engaging, informative and thought-provoking intervention in the debate. This title is Open Access.

scholarly journals Assessing the field of health policy and systems research using symposium abstract submissions and machine learning techniques

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 721-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlyn K Macarayan ◽  
Dina Balabanova ◽  
George Gotsadze
Keyword(s):  
Health Policy ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
High Income ◽  
Health Systems Research ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Health Policy And Systems

Abstract The field of health policy and systems research (HPSR) has grown rapidly in the past decade. Examining recently aggregated data from the Global Symposia on Health Systems Research, a key global fora for HPSR convened by the largest international society—Health Systems Global (HSG)—provides opportunities to enhance existing research on HPSR capacity using novel analytical techniques. This addresses the demand not only to map the field but also to examine potential predictors of acceptance to, and participation at, these global conferences to inform future work and strategies in promoting HPSR. We examined data from the abstracts submitted for two Global Symposia on Health Systems Research in 2016 and 2018 by type of institution, countries, regional groupings and gender. After mapping hotspot areas for HPSR production, we then examined how the corresponding author’s characteristics were associated with being accepted to present at the Global Symposia. Our findings showed that submissions for the Global Symposia increased by 12% from 2016 to 2018. Submissions increased across all participant groups, in particular, the for-profit organizations and research/consultancy firms showing the highest increases, at 58% for both. We also found reduced submissions from high-income countries, whereas submissions from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, increased substantially revealing the inclusivity values of Symposium organizers. Submissions increased to a larger extent among women than men. Being a woman, coming from a high-income country and having multiple abstracts submitted were found to be significant predictors for an abstract to be accepted and presented in the Symposia. Findings provide critical baseline information on the extent of interest and engagement in a global forum of various institutions and researchers in HPSR that can be useful for setting future directions of HSG and other similar organizations to support the advancement of HPSR worldwide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document