scholarly journals 19 The role of trust in global resource allocation decisions for vaccine preventable diseases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Christen ◽  
L Conteh
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Vaccine Preventable Diseases ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

scholarly journals A Qualitative Study of the Views of Health and Social Care Decision-makers on the Role of Wellbeing in Resource Allocation Decisions in the UK

Economies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Tessa Peasgood ◽  
Jill Carlton ◽  
John Brazier
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Subjective Wellbeing ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

There has been growing international interest in the role that wellbeing measures could play within policy making in health and social care. This project explored the opinions of a sample of UK decision-makers on the relevance of wellbeing and subjective wellbeing (by which we mean good and bad feelings or overall evaluations of life, such as life satisfaction) for resource allocation decisions within health and social care. Through these discussions we draw out the perceived advantages and the potential concerns that decision-makers have about broadening out to wellbeing and subjective wellbeing rather than just measuring health. Three focus groups were conducted: with members of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Citizen’s Council, with a Health and Wellbeing Board at a Local Authority and with Public Health England. In addition, eleven semi-structured interviews were held with staff from NHS England and members of a range of NICE committees. We identified a range of opinions about the role of wellbeing and a broadly held view that there was a need for improved consideration of broader quality of life outcomes. We also identified considerable caution in relation to the use of subjective wellbeing.

The Role of Public Opinion in Drug Resource Allocation Decisions

1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine A. Melfi ◽  
Brenda G. Drake ◽  
William M. Tierney
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

Unexpected Consequences: The Effects on Non-Accelerated Filers of an Accelerated Filing Deadline and SOX Section 404

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-112
Author(s):  
Bei Dong ◽  
Stefanie L. Tate ◽  
Le Emily Xu
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Section 404 ◽  
Auditor Change ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Jel Classifications ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

SYNOPSIS Regulations implemented by the SEC in 2003 and 2004 simultaneously shortened the financial statement filing deadlines and increased the time required for both the preparation of financial statements and the related audit of accelerated filers (AFs). However, there were indirect, unintended negative consequences for companies not subject to the regulations, namely, non-accelerated filers (NAFs). The new regulations imposed strains on auditor resources requiring auditors to make resource allocation decisions that negatively affected NAFs. We find that NAFs with an auditor who had a high proportion of AF clients (high-AF) had longer audit delays after the regulations were implemented than NAFs of an auditor with a low proportion of AF clients (low-AF). Further, we document that NAFs with high-AF auditors were more likely to change auditors than NAFs with low-AF auditors. Finally, NAFs that switched to auditors with less AFs experienced shorter audit delays after the auditor change. JEL Classifications: M42; M48.

scholarly journals Balancing scarce hospital resources during the COVID-19 pandemic using discrete-event simulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Melman ◽  
A.K. Parlikad ◽  
E.A.B. Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Discrete Event Simulation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Discrete Event ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Event Simulation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Allocation Decisions ◽  
Allocation Strategies ◽  
Resource Allocation Decisions

AbstractCOVID-19 has disrupted healthcare operations and resulted in large-scale cancellations of elective surgery. Hospitals throughout the world made life-altering resource allocation decisions and prioritised the care of COVID-19 patients. Without effective models to evaluate resource allocation strategies encompassing COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 care, hospitals face the risk of making sub-optimal local resource allocation decisions. A discrete-event-simulation model is proposed in this paper to describe COVID-19, elective surgery, and emergency surgery patient flows. COVID-19-specific patient flows and a surgical patient flow network were constructed based on data of 475 COVID-19 patients and 28,831 non-COVID-19 patients in Addenbrooke’s hospital in the UK. The model enabled the evaluation of three resource allocation strategies, for two COVID-19 wave scenarios: proactive cancellation of elective surgery, reactive cancellation of elective surgery, and ring-fencing operating theatre capacity. The results suggest that a ring-fencing strategy outperforms the other strategies, regardless of the COVID-19 scenario, in terms of total direct deaths and the number of surgeries performed. However, this does come at the cost of 50% more critical care rejections. In terms of aggregate hospital performance, a reactive cancellation strategy prioritising COVID-19 is no longer favourable if more than 7.3% of elective surgeries can be considered life-saving. Additionally, the model demonstrates the impact of timely hospital preparation and staff availability, on the ability to treat patients during a pandemic. The model can aid hospitals worldwide during pandemics and disasters, to evaluate their resource allocation strategies and identify the effect of redefining the prioritisation of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document