scholarly journals Evidence remains lacking that vaccinating healthcare workers prevents influenza in elderly residents in long-term care

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 75-76
Author(s):  
H. Seale
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care

scholarly journals Characterization and evolution of infection control practices among SARS-CoV-2 infected healthcare workers of acute care hospitals and long-term care facilities in Quebec, Canada, Spring 2020

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-37
Author(s):  
Sara Carazo ◽  
Denis Laliberté ◽  
Jasmin Villeneuve ◽  
Richard Martin ◽  
Pierre Deshaies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Attack Rate ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Exposure Period ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

ABSTRACT Objectives: To estimate the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate and the secondary attack rate among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Quebec, the most affected province of Canada during the first wave; to describe the evolution of work-related exposures and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in infected HCWs; and to compare the exposures and practices between acute care hospitals (ACHs) and long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Design: Survey of cases Participants: Quebec HCWs from private and public institutions with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between 1st March and 14th June 2020. HCWs ≥18 years old, having worked during the exposure period and survived their illness were eligible for the survey. Methods: After obtaining consent, 4542 HCWs completed a standardized questionnaire. COVID-19 rates and proportions of exposures and practices were estimated and compared between ACHs and LTCFs. Results: HCWs represented 25% (13,726/54,005) of all reported COVID-19 cases in Quebec and had an 11-times greater rate than non-HCWs. Their secondary household attack rate was 30%. Most affected occupations were healthcare support workers, nurses and nurse assistants, working in LTCFs (45%) and ACHs (30%). Compared to ACHs, HCWs of LTCFs had less training, higher staff mobility between working sites, similar PPE use but better self-reported compliance with at-work physical distancing. Sub-optimal IPC practices declined over time but were still present at the end of the first wave. Conclusion: Quebec HCWs and their families were severely affected during the first wave of COVID-19. Insufficient pandemic preparedness and suboptimal IPC practices likely contributed to high transmission in both LTCFs and ACHs.

scholarly journals Impact and Management of COVID-19 Among Healthcare Workers in two Acute Care Hospitals and two Associated Long-term Care Centres in Barcelona, Spain

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Maria Montero-Moraga ◽  
Andrea Buron ◽  
Maria Sala ◽  
Paula Santia ◽  
Martina Lupia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Term Care

scholarly journals Vaccine effectiveness after 1st and 2nd dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in long-term care facility residents and healthcare workers – a Danish cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Rask Moustsen-Helms ◽  
Hanne-Dorthe Emborg ◽  
Jens Nielsen ◽  
Katrine Finderup Nielsen ◽  
Tyra Grove Krause ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Vaccine Effectiveness ◽  
Calendar Time ◽  
Term Care

AbstractBackgroundAt the end of 2020, Denmark launched an immunization program against SARS-CoV-2. The Danish health authorities prioritized persons currently living in long-term care facilities (LTCF residents) and frontline healthcare workers (HCW) as the first receivers of vaccination. Here we present preliminary population based vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates in these two target groups.MethodsThe study was designed as a retrospective registry- and population-based observational cohort study including all LTCF residents and all HWC. The outcome was a polymerase chain reaction confirmed SARS-CoV-2, and VE was estimated for different periods following first and second dose. We used Poisson and Cox regressions to estimate respectively crude and calendar time-adjusted VE for the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for vaccinated versus unvaccinated.ResultsA total of 39,040 LTCF residents (median age at first dose; 84 years, Interquartile range (IQR): 77-90) and 331,039 HCW (median age at first dose; 47 years, IQR: 36-57) were included. Among LTCF residents, 95.2% and 86.0% received first and second dose from 27 December 2020 until 18 February 2021, for HWC the proportion was 27.8% and 24.4%. During a median follow-up of 53 days, there were 488 and 5,663 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases in the unvaccinated groups, whereas there were 57 and 52 in LTCF residents and HCW within the first 7 days after the second dose and 27 and 10 cases beyond seven days of second dose. No protective effect was observed for LTCF residents after first dose. In HCW, VE was 17% (95% CI; 4-28) in the > 14 days after first dose (before second dose). Furthermore, the VE in LTCF residents at day 0-7 of second dose was 52% (95% CI; 27-69) and 46% (95% CI; 28-59) in HCW. Beyond seven days of second dose, VE increased to 64% (95% CI; 14-84) and 90% (95% CI; 82-95) in the two groups, respectively.ConclusionThe results were promising regarding the VE both within and beyond seven days of second vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine currently used in many countries to help mitigate the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.Impact of the researchSo far, observational studies of the real-word effectiveness of the mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has been limited to the period after the administration of the first dose. This is the first report to date to present vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates after the second BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. We estimated a VE of 52% and 46% in LTCF residents and HCW within seven days, which increased to 64% and 90% in the two groups respectively beyond seven days of immunization. These findings supports maintaining a two-dose schedule of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

scholarly journals Utility of Healthcare System-Based Interventions in Improving the Uptake of Influenza Vaccination in Healthcare Workers at Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Bechini ◽  
Chiara Lorini ◽  
Patrizio Zanobini ◽  
Francesco Mandò Tacconi ◽  
Sara Boccalini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Vaccination Coverage ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Vaccination Uptake ◽  
Care Facilities

Healthcare workers (HCWs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) can represent a source of influenza infection for the elderly. While flu vaccination coverage (VC) is satisfactory in the elderly, HCWs are less likely to be vaccinated. There is no definitive evidence on which types of healthcare system-based interventions at LTCFs would be more useful in improving the vaccination uptake among HCWs. We performed a systematic review in different databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Evidence, Web of Science, Cinahl) to provide a synthesis of the available studies on this topic. Among the 1177 articles screened by their titles and abstracts, 27 were included in this review. Most of the studies reported multiple interventions addressed to improve access to vaccination, eliminate individual barriers, or introduce policy interventions. As expected, mandatory vaccinations seem to be the most useful intervention to increase the vaccination uptake in HCWs. However, our study suggests that better results in the vaccination uptake in HCWs were obtained by combining interventions in different areas. Educational campaigns alone could not have an impact on vaccination coverage. LTCFs represent an ideal setting to perform preventive multi-approach interventions for the epidemiological transition toward aging and chronicity.

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination of healthcare workers' uniforms in long-term care facilities

2009 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Gaspard ◽  
E. Eschbach ◽  
D. Gunther ◽  
S. Gayet ◽  
X. Bertrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

Health Behavior Associated With Influenza Vaccination Among Healthcare Workers in Long-Term-Care Facilities

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 609-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Manuel ◽  
B. Henry ◽  
J. Hockin ◽  
M. Naus
Keyword(s):  
Health Behavior ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Care Facilities

Objective:To investigate the health behavior associated with influenza vaccination among healthcare workers (HCWs) in long-term–care facilities.Design:A cross-sectional, self-administered survey of HCWs, augmented with focus groups to further examine attitudes toward influenza vaccination.Setting:Two long-term–care facilities participated in the survey. The focus groups were held at one of the two facilities.Participants:All HCWs were invited to participate in the survey and all nonmanagerial staff members were invited to participate in the focus groups. The response rate for the survey was 58% (231 of 401).Results:Vaccinated HCWs had a more positive attitude toward influenza vaccination and a greater belief that the vaccine is effective. This was not accompanied by differences in vaccine knowledge or values of potential preventive outcomes. Nonvaccinated respondents were more likely to believe that other preventive measures, such as washing hands, taking vitamins and supplements, eating a nutritious diet, exercising, and taking homeopathic or naturopathic medications, were more effective than vaccination. Additional findings from the focus groups suggest that HCWs believe that the main purpose of influenza vaccination programs is to protect residents' health at the expense, potential harm, and burden of responsibility of the staff.Conclusions:This study identifies challenges to and opportunities for improving vaccination rates among HCWs. A message that emphasizes the health benefits of vaccination to staff members, such as including vaccination as part of a staff “wellness” program, may improve the credibility of influenza immunization programs and coverage rates.(Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:609-614).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document