PS-100 Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for hospitalised medical patients (HMP) with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A176.1-A176
Author(s):  
FI Ferreira Tátá ◽  
MA Pires Rebelo ◽  
ML Grenho Pereira ◽  
NM Ribeiro Landeira ◽  
SM Dias Fanica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis

Venous Thromboembolism Prevention with LMWHs in Medical and Orthopedic Surgery Patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven B Deitelzweig ◽  
Gordon J Vanscoy ◽  
Cynthia S Niccolai ◽  
Thomas L Rihn
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Consensus Guidelines ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the role of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in medical and orthopedic surgery patients. VTE prophylaxis trials in these practice settings establishing the current use of LMWHs marketed in the US are included. An overview is also provided of VTE incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis consensus guidelines. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analyses for Food and Drug Administration–approved LMWHs were identified from a MEDLINE search (1980–March 2002). Search terms included dalteparin, enoxaparin, internal medicine, low-molecular-weight heparin, orthopedic surgery, risk factors, tinzaparin, and venous thromboembolism. DATA SYNTHESIS: Consensus guidelines are useful as an initial guide to appropriate VTE prophylaxis; however, a review of the primary literature is needed to identify optimal agents, regimens, or interventions. LMWHs have demonstrated sound efficacy in VTE prevention; however, the quantity and quality of literature are not always comparable for the available agents. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin has demonstrated efficacy and safety in VTE prevention in medical patients, whereas information is limited or lacking for dalteparin and tinzaparin. Total hip replacement (THR) trials have been conducted with all US-marketed LMWHs and have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of each agent. Trials specifically establishing the efficacy of an LMWH in total knee replacement surgery (TKR) have been published for enoxaparin. One combination THR and TKR trial has been published for tinzaparin. These trial outcomes have positioned the LMWHs as key alternatives to adjusted-dose warfarin for VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery. Inherent differences between LMWHs prevent the extrapolation of clinical outcomes from 1 trial to another.

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism and Pregnancy Complications using Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Safety and Thromboprophylactic Efficacy.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1781-1781
Author(s):  
Ian A. Greer ◽  
Catherine Nelson-Piercy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Pregnancy Complications ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis

Abstract Introduction Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is used in pregnancy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and for prevention of pregnancy complications, because of efficacy greater than or equal to unfractionated heparin, and a lower rate of side effects observed in non-pregnant patients. Due to the lack of data from large randomized controlled trials to guide physician’s practices, there is a need for increased data on safety and efficacy of LMWH for these indications. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using LMWH during pregnancy for preventing VTE and pregnancy complications by performing a systematic review of data from published literature. Methods Data from published studies on the use of LMWH during pregnancy as VTE prophylaxis or LMWH for prevention of pregnancy complications were identified by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to the end of 2003. The reference lists from identified articles were also hand searched. Data on the LMWH regime, incidence of VTE, pregnancy complications, clinical outcomes and side effects were extracted and entered into pre-piloted forms. Results Fifty studies reporting 2,322 pregnancies were included in this analysis. LMWH was received antenatally in 1883 (81%) of cases, and only peri or postpartum in 389 (17%) of cases. Dalteparin and enoxaparin were the most commonly used LMWH, but certoparin, nadroparin, rivaparin, and tinzaparin were also used. There were no maternal deaths. VTE was reported in 26 (1.1%) pregnancies. Severe maternal bleeding occurred in 46 (2%) pregnancies and was generally associated with obstetric causes. Thrombocytopenia occurred in 10 (0.4%) pregnancies and was not associated with thrombosis. Minor allergic skin reactions occurred in 23 (1%) pregnancies, and osteoporosis in two (0.09%) pregnancies. Conclusion Data from this systematic review of the literature suggest that LMWH is both safe and effective for use as VTE prophylaxis during pregnancy.

Thromboprophylaxis in medical patients: the role of low-molecular-weight heparin

2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (07) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Norris ◽  
Turpie Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Consensus Statements

SummaryMany hospitalised medical patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Consensus statements recommend that such patients be assessed for risk of VTE on admission to hospital and receive thromboprophylaxis where appropriate. However, VTE prophylaxis is not widely used in medical patients. One explanation is that assessing medical patients’ risk of VTE is complicated. The risk depends not only on the current illness but also on multiple intrinsic factors, and a variety of strategies for identifying patients who should receive thromboprophylaxis have been suggested. Thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated heparin (UFH) has proved to be effective in reducing the incidence of deep-vein thrombosis and overall mortality in medical patients. Clinical trial evidence, including a meta-analysis, suggests that thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is at least as effective as with UFH, and also has the advantage of fewer bleeding complications. In particular, two large, randomised clinical trials – Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin (MEDENOX) and Prospective Evaluation of Dalteparin Efficacy for Prevention of VTE in Immobilized Patients Trial (PREVENT) – showed that thromboprophylaxis with the LMWHs enoxaparin (40 mg s.c. once daily) or dalteparin (5,000 IU once daily) is more effective than placebo and well tolerated in medical patients. In addition, the Thromboembolism-Prevention in Cardiopulmonary Diseases with Enoxaparin (THE-PRINCE) trial showed that enoxaparin treatment was as effective as UFH. These studies provide solid evidence for the widespread use of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients.

Venous thromboembolism in a general hospital. An update with low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis

VASA ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Schulz ◽  
Kesselring ◽  
Seeberger ◽  
Andresen
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Event Rates

Background: Patients admitted to hospital for surgery or acute medical illnesses have a high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Today’s widespread use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for VTE prophylaxis is supposed to have reduced VTE rates substantially. However, data concerning the overall effectiveness of LMWH prophylaxis is sparse. Patients and methods: We prospectively studied all patients with symptomatic and objectively confirmed VTE seen in our hospital over a three year period. Event rates in different wards were analysed and compared. VTE prophylaxis with Enoxaparin was given to all patients at risk during their hospital stay. Results: A total of 50 464 inpatients were treated during the study period. 461 examinations were carried out for symptoms suggestive of VTE and yielded 89 positive results in 85 patients. Seventy eight patients were found to have deep vein thrombosis, 7 had pulmonary embolism, and 4 had both deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The overall in hospital VTE event rate was 0.17%. The rate decreased during the study period from 0.22 in year one to 0,16 in year two and 0.13 % in year three. It ranged highest in neurologic and trauma patients (0.32%) and lowest (0.08%) in gynecology-obstetrics. Conclusions: With a simple and strictly applied regimen of prophylaxis with LMWH the overall rate of symptomatic VTE was very low in our hospitalized patients. Beside LMWH prophylaxis, shortening hospital stays and substantial improvements in surgical and anasthesia techniques achieved during the last decades probably play an essential role in decreasing VTE rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document