scholarly journals Cardiorespiratory fitness and heart rate recovery predict sudden cardiac death independent of ejection fraction

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 434-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jussi A Hernesniemi ◽  
Kalle Sipilä ◽  
Antti Tikkakoski ◽  
Juho T Tynkkynen ◽  
Pashupati P Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiorespiratory Fitness ◽  
Exercise Testing ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Heart Rate Recovery ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and heart rate recovery (HRR) associate with the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) independently of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).MethodsThe Finnish Cardiovascular Study is a prospective clinical study of patients referred to clinical exercise testing in 2001–2008 and follow-up until December 2013. Patients without pacemakers undergoing first maximal or submaximal exercise testing with cycle ergometer were included (n=3776). CRF in metabolic equivalents (METs) was estimated by achieving maximal work level. HRR was defined as the reduction in heart rate 1 min after maximal exertion. Adjudication of SCD was based on death certificates. LVEF was measured for clinical indications in 71.4% of the patients (n=2697).ResultsPopulation mean age was 55.7 years (SD 13.1; 61% men). 98 SCDs were recorded during a median follow-up of 9.1 years (6.9–10.7). Mean CRF and HRR were 7.7 (SD 2.9) METs and 25 (SD 12) beats/min/min. Both CRF and HRR were associated with the risk of SCD in the entire study population (HRCRF0.47 (0.37–0.59), p<0.001 and HRHRR0.57 (0.48–0.67), p<0.001 with HR estimates corresponding to one SD increase in the exposure variables) and with CRF, HRR and LVEF in the same model (HRCRF0.60 (0.45–0.79), p<0.001, HRHRR0.65 (0.51–0.82), p<0.001) or adjusting additionally for all significant risk factors for SCD (LVEF, sex, creatinine level, history of myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation, corrected QT interval) (HRCRF0.69 (0.52–0.93), p<0.01, HRHRR0.74 (0.58–0.95) p=0.02).ConclusionsCRF and HRR are significantly associated with the risk of SCD regardless of LVEF.

Beyond ejection fraction: Novel clinical approaches towards sudden cardiac death risk stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Issa Pour-Ghaz ◽  
Mark Heckle ◽  
Ikechukwu Ifedili ◽  
Sharif Kayali ◽  
Christopher Nance ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Icd Therapy

: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is indicated for patients at risk for sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The most commonly used risk stratification algorithms use left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to determine which patients qualify for ICD therapy, even though LVEF is a better marker of total mortality than ventricular tachyarrhythmias mortality. This review evaluates imaging tools and novel biomarkers proposed for better risk stratifying arrhythmic substrate, thereby identifying optimal ICD therapy candidates.

New techniques for risk assessment in sudden cardiac death

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2327-2330
Author(s):  
Juan Fernandez-Armenta ◽  
Antonio Berruezo ◽  
Juan Acosta ◽  
Diego Penela
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death (SCD) is one of the main objectives of clinical arrhythmology. Despite increased knowledge of the fundamental basis and predictors of SCD, the estimation of individual risk remains challenging. To date, symptomatic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are the main variables used to identify patients at high risk of SCD who could potentially benefit from preventive therapies. Beyond left ventricular ejection fraction, new diagnostic tools have been proposed to better stratify patients at risk of SCD. Among them, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, which allows direct visualization of the arrhythmogenic substrate, is considered particularly promising. Genetic testing and serum biomarkers may also have a role in SCD risk assessment.

Abstract 16416: Wide QRS-T Angle on the 12-lead ECG as a Predictor of Sudden Death Beyond the LV Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelvin C Chua ◽  
Carmen Teodorescu ◽  
Audrey Uy-Evanado ◽  
Kyndaron Reinier ◽  
Kumar Narayanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sudden Cardiac Death ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Lv Ejection Fraction

Introduction: If we are to improve risk stratification for sudden cardiac death (SCD) we should extend beyond the LV ejection fraction (LVEF). The frontal QRS-T angle has been shown to predict risk of SCD but its value independent of LVEF has not been investigated. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that a wide frontal QRS-T angle predicts SCD independent of LVEF. Methods: Cases of adult sudden cardiac arrest with an available electrocardiogram before the event were identified from a large ongoing population based study of SCD in the Northwest US (population approx. one million). Subjects with a computable frontal QRS-T angle were included. A total of 686 SCD cases (mean age 67.4 years; 95% CI, 52.5 to 82.3 years; 68.2% males; 83.5% whites) met criteria, and were compared to 871 controls with and without coronary artery disease (mean age 66.8 years, 55.3 to 78.3 years; 67.7% males; 90.6% whites) from the same geographical region. Results: The mean frontal QRS-T angle was higher in SCD cases (73.9 degrees; 95% CI, 17.5 to 130.3 degrees, p<0.0001) compared to controls (51.1 degrees; 95% CI 5.0 to 97.2 degrees). Using a cut-off of more than 90 degrees, the frontal QRS-T angle was predictive of SCD, and remained predictive, after adjusting for age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), prolonged QTc, prolonged QRS duration and baseline comorbidities (OR 1.80; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.55, p=0.001). On the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the QRS-T angle demonstrated an area-under-curve (AUC) value of 0.614. Compared to the lowest quartile of QRS-T angle, the highest quartile had nearly a triple increase in the risk of SCD (OR 2.71; 95% CI; 2.03 to 3.60; p<0.0001). Conclusion: A wide QRS-T angle greater than 90 degrees is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death independent of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document