Mismatch repair deficiency and prognostic significance in patients with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-788
Author(s):  
Soyoun Rachel Kim ◽  
Annick Pina ◽  
Arianne Albert ◽  
Jessica N McAlpine ◽  
Robert Wolber ◽  
...  

ObjectivesMismatch repair deficiency is observed in 25%–30% of all endometrial cancers. This can be detected by the absence of mismatch repair protein staining on immunohistochemistry, and is used as a screen for Lynch syndrome. Only 10% of women with mismatch repair deficiency have Lynch syndrome, but mismatch repair deficiency may still have prognostic significance. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between mismatch repair-deficient and mismatch repair-proficient low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1 or 2).MethodsThis was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1 or 2) from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority region from February 2011 to January 2016 that were assessed for mismatch repair deficiency. Any other histology, stage, or grade was excluded from the study. Primary outcome measures were progression-free survival and overall survival calculated using Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards model estimated the association between mismatch repair deficiency and recurrence and death after adjustment for covariates, expressed as hazard ratios (HRs). Secondary outcome measures were recurrence rates expressed per 100 person-years (p100py).ResultsThere were 475 patients diagnosed with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer, including 131 with mismatch repair-deficient (27.6%) and 344 with mismatch repair-proficient (72.4%) tumors. Women with mismatch repair-deficient tumors had worse progression-free survival (24 months; p=0.0082) and higher recurrence rates (3.56 p100py) compared with those with mismatch repair-proficient tumors (27 months; 1.21 p100py, p=0.04). The absolute number of recurrences was overall low. There were 11 recurrences out of 131 mismatch repair-deficient cases (8.4%) and 14 out of 344 mismatch repair proficient cases (4.1%). After adjustment for age, lymphovascular space invasion status, adjuvant therapy, and post-operative grade, mismatch repair-deficient status remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 3.56, 95% CI 2.01 to 5.95). There was no significant difference in overall survival between mismatch repair groups (mismatch repair-proficient group 27.5 months vs 25.0 months in the deficient group) (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.10).ConclusionIn low-risk stage IA grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancers, mismatch repair deficiency is associated with a higher recurrence rate than mismatch repair proficiency after adjustment for covariates, implying that mismatch repair deficiency reflects a different biology in endometrial cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17122-e17122
Author(s):  
Soyoun Rachel Kim ◽  
Annick Pina ◽  
Arianne Albert ◽  
Jessica N. McAlpine ◽  
Robert Wolber ◽  
...  

e17122 Background: Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is observed in 25-30% of all endometrial cancers. This can be detected by the absence of MMR protein staining on immunohistochemistry (IHC), and is used in many jurisdictions as a screen for an inherited mutation in one of the MMR genes (Lynch Syndrome). Only 10% of women with MMR deficiency (MMRd) have Lynch syndrome, but MMRd may still have prognostic significance. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between MMR deficient and proficient low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancers (stage IA, grade 1/2). Methods: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all low-risk endometrial cancers from Vancouver Coastal Health authority region from 2011 to 2016 that were assessed for MMR deficiency (MMRd). Primary outcome measures were recurrence rates expressed per person-years (py), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards model estimated the association between MMRd and recurrence and death after adjustment for covariates, expressed as hazard ratios (HR). Results: There were 475 low-risk patients, including 131 MMRd (27.6%) and 345 MMRp (proficient) patients. Women with MMRd tumors had higher recurrence rates (3.53p100py vs 1.21p100py) and worse PFS (p = 0.0082) compared to women with MMRp tumors. After adjustment for age, LVSI status, adjuvant therapy, and post-operative grade, MMRd status remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.27-7.04). There was no significant difference in OS between MMR groups (HR 1.38, 95% CI 0.57-3.33). Conclusions: In low-risk stage IA grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancers, MMR deficiency is associated with a higher recurrence rate than in MMR proficient cases, after adjustment for covariates, implying that MMR deficiency reflects a different biology in endometrial cancer.


2005 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taro Kanaya ◽  
Satoru Kyo ◽  
Junko Sakaguchi ◽  
Yoshiko Maida ◽  
Mitsuhiro Nakamura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. jmedgenet-2020-107542
Author(s):  
D Gareth Evans ◽  
Fiona Lalloo ◽  
Neil AJ Ryan ◽  
Naomi Bowers ◽  
Kate Green ◽  
...  

BackgroundTesting cancers for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a quick and inexpensive means of triaging individuals for germline Lynch syndrome testing. The aim of this study was to evaluate tumour dMMR and the prevalence of Lynch syndrome in patients referred to the Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, which serves a population of 5.6 million.MethodsTumour testing used IHC for MMR proteins with targeted BRAF and MLH1 promotor methylation testing followed by germline mutation and somatic testing as appropriate.ResultsIn total, 3694 index tumours were tested by IHC (2204 colorectal cancers (CRCs), 739 endometrial cancers (ECs) and 761 other), of which 672/3694 (18.2%) had protein loss, including 348 (9.4%) with MLH1 loss. MLH1 loss was significantly higher for 739 ECs (15%) vs 2204 CRCs (10%) (p=0.0003) and was explained entirely by higher rates of somatic MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (87% vs 41%, p<0.0001). Overall, 65/134 (48.5%) patients with MLH1 loss and no MLH1 hypermethylation or BRAF c.1799T>A had constitutional MLH1 pathogenic variants. Of 456 patients with tumours showing loss of MSH2/MSH6, 216 (47.3%) had germline pathogenic variants in either gene. Isolated PMS2 loss was most suggestive of a germline MMR variant in 19/26 (73%). Of those with no germline pathogenic variant, somatic testing identified likely causal variants in 34/48 (71%) with MLH1 loss and in MSH2/MSH6 in 40/47 (85%) with MSH2/MSH6 loss.ConclusionsReflex testing of EC/CRC leads to uncertain diagnoses in many individuals with dMMR following IHC but without germline pathogenic variants or MLH1 hypermethylation. Tumour mutation testing is effective at decreasing this by identifying somatic dMMR in >75% of cases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1624-1630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annick Pina ◽  
Robert Wolber ◽  
Jessica N. McAlpine ◽  
Blake Gilks ◽  
Janice S. Kwon

ObjectiveThere is uncertainty about the prognostic significance of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in endometrial cancer. The objective was to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes of endometrial cancers based on MMR status within a population-based study.MethodsThis was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all endometrial cancer cases from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority region, evaluated for 4 MMR proteins using immunohistochemistry from 2012 to 2015. Patients were classified as MMR deficient (dMMR, any MMR protein absent) or MMR proficient (pMMR), Demographics, tumor characteristics, recurrences, and survival rates were compared according to MMR status.ResultsThere were 892 patients, with 650 pMMR (72.5%) and 242 dMMR tumors. The dMMR group had more endometrioid tumors (87.6% vs 74.0%, P < 0.001), lymphovascular space invasion (43.8% vs 30.8%, P = 0.001), and dedifferentiation (5.9% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001), but fewer grade 1 tumors compared with the pMMR group (31.8% vs 40.8%, P < 0.001). Median progression-free survival and overall survival have not been reached. After a median follow-up of 31 months (1–99 months), there was no difference in progression or recurrence rates between pMMR and dMMR tumors (19.5% vs 16.5%; P = 0.31). However, among those with nonendometrioid tumors, recurrence and mortality rates were significantly higher for pMMR than dMMR tumors (42.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.001, and 36.1% vs 13.1%, P = 0.01, respectively), despite similar stage and lymphovascular space invasion distributions.DiscussionIn this population-based study, there were no significant differences in recurrence or survival outcomes according to MMR status in endometrial cancer. However, among those with nonendometrioid tumors, there were lower recurrence and mortality rates associated with MMR-deficient compared with MMR-proficient tumors.


2014 ◽  
Vol 147 (6) ◽  
pp. 1308-1316.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigurdis Haraldsdottir ◽  
Heather Hampel ◽  
Jerneja Tomsic ◽  
Wendy L. Frankel ◽  
Rachel Pearlman ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. E2-E89
Author(s):  
B Goeppert ◽  
S Roessler ◽  
M Renner ◽  
S Singer ◽  
A Mehrabi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document