Health-related quality of life among cervical cancer patients in India

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1887-1892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Jyani ◽  
Akashdeep Singh Chauhan ◽  
Bhavana Rai ◽  
Sushmita Ghoshal ◽  
Radhika Srinivasan ◽  
...  

IntroductionEstimation of health-related quality of life of cervical cancer patients in India is important in assessing the well-being of patients, monitor treatment outcomes, and conduct health technology assessments. However, health-related quality of life estimates for different stages of cervical cancer are not available for the Indian population. This study aims to generate stage-specific quality of life scores for cervical cancer patients in India.MethodsA cross-sectional study using the EQ-5D (EuroQol 5-dimensions) instrument, that consists of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) was conducted. A total of 159 cervical cancer patients were interviewed. Mean EQ-5D-5L quality of life scores (utility scores) were calculated using the EQ-5D-5L index value calculator across different stages of cervical cancer. The proportion of patients reporting problems in different attributes of EQ-5D-5L was assessed. The impact of socio-economic determinants on health-related quality of life was evaluated using multiple linear regression.ResultsThe mean EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS utility scores among patients of cervical cancer were 0.64 [95% CI=0.61–0.67] and 67.6 [95% CI=65.17–70.03], respectively. The most frequently reported problem among cervical cancer patients was pain/discomfort (61.88%), followed by difficulty in performing usual activities (53.81%), and anxiety/depression (41.26%).ConclusionCervical cancer significantly impacts the health-related quality of life of the patients in India. Clinical interventions should focus on the control of pain and relief of anxiety. The measurement of health-related quality of life should be an integral component of the effectiveness of interventions as well as health technology assessment.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehreen Shajahan Ahamed ◽  
Amsalu Degu

Abstract Background: A previous systematic review showed that health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was adversely affected during treatment of cervical cancer, with a worsening global score. However, there was a lack of data in the study setting. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the HRQoL of cervical cancer patients at Kenyatta National Hospital.Methods: A cross-sectional design of the study was employed among cervical cancer patients. All eligible cervical cancer patients during the study period were included in the study. Hence, a consecutive sample of 103 cervical cancer patients was involved in the study. Following consent, study participants were interviewed using The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC QLQ-30) and Cervical Cancer Module CX24 (EORTC QLQ-CX24). The clinical characteristics and treatment regimens were collected by reviewing the medical records. Interpretation and linear transformation of the raw score of health-related quality of life were conducted as per EORTC QLQ 30 and EORTC QLQ-CX24 Scoring Manual. The data were entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.0 software. Frequency tables mean, percentage, and figures were used to represent the data. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate the associated factors of health-related quality of life. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the participant population was found to be 55.8 ± 5.6 years. Most of the study participants had stage III cervical cancer (56.3%) and without comorbidities (65%). The mean score of the global health status was 41.99. The physical functioning, cognitive functioning, and financial difficulties mean scores were 71.6, 73.3, and 93.5, respectively. Under the symptom scale, nausea and vomiting, pain, and appetite loss had mean scores of 70.1, 67.2, and 66.0, respectively. The overall quality of life data showed 69% of study participants had poor quality of life while 31% of study participants had good quality of life. Patients with early-stage disease (stage I and II) were 7.3 times (AOR = 7.3, 95% CI = 2.4 – 21.7, p = 0.000) more likely to have a good quality of life than patients with advanced-stage disease. Patients with no comorbidities were 3.1 times (COR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.1 – 9.1, p = 0.037) more likely to have a good quality of life than patients with comorbidities.Conclusions: The overall health-related quality of life among cervical cancer patients was poor in the study setting. Advanced stage of disease and presence of comorbidities were the significant predictors of poor quality of life.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e89851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satwant Kumar ◽  
Madhu Lata Rana ◽  
Khushboo Verma ◽  
Narayanjeet Singh ◽  
Anil Kumar Sharma ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christina Y. Le ◽  
Clodagh M. Toomey ◽  
Carolyn A. Emery ◽  
Jackie L. Whittaker

Knee trauma can lead to poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and osteoarthritis. We aimed to assess HRQoL 3–12 years following youth sport-related knee injury considering HRQoL and osteoarthritis determinants. Generic (EQ-5D-5L index, EQ-VAS) and condition-specific (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score quality of life subscale, KOOS QOL) HRQoL were assessed in 124 individuals 3–12 years following youth sport-related knee injury and 129 uninjured controls of similar age, sex, and sport. Linear regression examined differences in HRQoL outcomes by injury group. Multivariable linear regression explored the influence of sex, time-since-injury, injury type, body mass index, knee muscle strength, Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) score, and Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) moderate-to-strenuous physical activity. Participant median (range) age was 23 years (14–29) and 55% were female. Injury history was associated with poorer KOOS QOL (−8.41; 95%CI −10.76, −6.06) but not EQ-5D-5L (−0.0074; −0.0238, 0.0089) or EQ-VAS (−3.82; −8.77, 1.14). Injury history (−5.14; −6.90, −3.38), worse ICOAP score (−0.40; −0.45, −0.36), and anterior cruciate ligament tear (−1.41; −2.77, −0.06) contributed to poorer KOOS QOL. Worse ICOAP score contributed to poorer EQ-5D-5L (−0.0024; −0.0034, −0.0015) and higher GLTEQ moderate-to-strenuous physical activity to better EQ-VAS (0.10; 0.03, 0.17). Knee trauma is associated with poorer condition-specific but not generic HRQoL 3–12 years post-injury.


Author(s):  
Alexis Ogdie ◽  
Jessica A. Walsh ◽  
Soumya D. Chakravarty ◽  
Steven Peterson ◽  
Kim Hung Lo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction/objectives To evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and productivity following treatment with intravenous (IV) golimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Patients were randomized to IV golimumab 2 mg/kg (n=241) at Weeks 0, 4, then every 8 weeks (q8w) through Week 52 or placebo (n=239) at Weeks 0, 4, then q8w, with crossover to IV golimumab 2 mg/kg at Weeks 24, 28, then q8w through Week 52. Change from baseline in EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), daily productivity VAS, and the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) was assessed. Relationships between these outcomes and disease activity and patient functional capability were evaluated post hoc. Results At Week 8, change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L index (0.14 vs 0.04), EQ-VAS (17.16 vs 3.69), daily productivity VAS (−2.91 vs −0.71), and WLQ productivity loss score (−2.92 vs −0.78) was greater in the golimumab group versus the placebo group, respectively. At Week 52, change from baseline was similar in the golimumab and placebo-crossover groups (EQ-5D-5L index: 0.17 and 0.15; EQ-VAS: 21.61 and 20.84; daily productivity VAS: −2.89 and −3.31; WLQ productivity loss: −4.49 and −3.28, respectively). HRQoL and productivity were generally associated with disease activity and functional capability, with continued association from Week 8 through Week 52. Conclusion IV golimumab resulted in early and sustained improvements in HRQoL and productivity from Week 8 through 1 year in patients with PsA. HRQoL and productivity improvements were associated with improvements in disease activity and patient functional capability. Key Points• In patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), intravenous (IV) golimumab improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and productivity as early as 8 weeks and maintained improvement through 1 year• Improvements in HRQoL and productivity outcomes in patients with PsA treated with IV golimumab were associated with improvements in disease activity and patient functional capability outcomes• IV golimumab is an effective treatment option for PsA that can mitigate the negative effects of the disease on HRQoL and productivity


Author(s):  
Hester.R. Trompetter ◽  
Cynthia S. Bonhof ◽  
Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse ◽  
Gerard Vreugdenhil ◽  
Floortje Mols

Abstract Purpose Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy ((CI)PN) becomes chronic in 30% of cancer patients. Knowledge of predictors of chronic (CI)PN and related impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is lacking. We examined the role of optimism in chronic (CI)PN severity and associated HRQoL in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients up to two years after diagnosis. Methods CRC patients from a prospective cohort study participated, with sensory peripheral neuropathy (SPN) 1 year after diagnosis (n = 142). Multivariable regression analyses examined the cross-sectional association between optimism (measured by the LOT-R) and SPN severity/HRQoL (measured by the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and QLQ-C30), as well as the prospective association in a subsample that completed measures 2 years after diagnosis and still experienced SPN (n = 86). Results At 1-year follow-up, higher optimism was associated with better global HRQoL, and better physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning (all p < .01). Optimism at year one was also prospectively associated with better global HRQoL (p < .05), and emotional and cognitive functioning at 2-year follow-up (both p < .01). Optimism was not related to self-reported SPN severity. Significant associations were retained when controlling for demographic/clinical variables, and became non-significant after controlling for depressive and anxiety symptoms. Conclusions Optimism and depressive and anxiety symptoms are associated with HRQoL in CRC patients with chronic (CI)PN. Future research may illuminate the mechanisms that these factors share, like the use of (non)adaptive coping styles such as avoidance and acceptance that may inform the design of targeted interventions to help patients to adapt to chronic (CI)PN.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document