scholarly journals 236 Tumor size as independent prognostic factor in stage IA endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

Author(s):  
G Co ◽  
R Sicam
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 421-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAROSLAV KLAT ◽  
ALES MLADENKA ◽  
JANA DVORACKOVA ◽  
SYLVA BAJSOVA ◽  
ONDREJ SIMETKA

2014 ◽  
Vol 290 (6) ◽  
pp. 1231-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Kalogiannidis ◽  
Stamatios Petousis ◽  
Mattheos Bobos ◽  
Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou ◽  
Maria Topalidou ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Wang ◽  
Fei Wan ◽  
Jun Pan ◽  
Guan-Zhen Yu ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (20) ◽  
pp. 4960-4967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Joseph ◽  
Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap ◽  
Richard Kefford ◽  
Wen-Jen Hwu ◽  
Jedd D. Wolchok ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuexiang Liang ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Donglei He ◽  
Yong Chen ◽  
Jingquan Li

AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of tumor size on the long-term outcome of colon cancer (CC) patients after curative surgery. A total of 782 curatively resected T4a stage CC patients without distant metastasis were enrolled. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the best threshold of tumor size: larger group (LG) and smaller group (SG). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for the differences in baseline characteristics. The ideal cutoff point of tumor size was 5 cm. In the multivariate analysis for the whole study series, tumor size was an independent prognostic factor. Patients in the LG had significant lower 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates (OS: 63.5% versus 75.2%, P < 0.001; RFS: 59.5% versus 72.4%, P < 0.001) than those in the SG. After matching, patients in the LG still demonstrated significant lower 5-year OS and RFS rates than those in the SG. The modified tumor-size-node-metastasis (mTSNM) staging system including tumor size was found to be more appropriate for predicting the OS and RFS of T4a stage CC than TNM stage, and the -2log likelihood of the mTSNM staging system was smaller than the value of TNM stage. In conclusion, tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS. We maintain that tumor size should be incorporated into the staging system to enhance the accuracy of the prognostic prediction of T4a stage CC patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Li ◽  
Guang Wu ◽  
Caibin Fan ◽  
Hexing Yuan

Abstract Background To evaluate the association of primary tumor size with clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP). Methods This study analyzed the data of 1001 patients with SCCP, obtained from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2014. The Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to analyze the effects of primary tumor size on overall survival (OS) and penile carcinoma-specific survival (PCSS). Results Advanced T stage (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001) and distant metastasis (P = 0.001) were more frequently associated with SCCP patients with tumor size ≥ 3 cm than those with tumor size  < 3 cm. In Kaplan–Meier analyses, the patients with large tumors (≥ 3 cm) exhibited an inferior OS and PCSS than those with small tumors (< 3 cm). Moreover, tumor size was identified to be an independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.665, P < 0.001] and PCSS (HR 2.076, P = 0.003) of patients with SCCP in multivariate analyses. Conclusions Large tumor size is associated with adverse clinicopathological characteristics of patients with SCCP. Besides, tumor size represents an independent prognostic factor for OS and PCSS. Therefore, clinical assessment of tumor size as a crucial prognostic factor might be highly beneficial for early intervention in patients with SCCP.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. S787-S788
Author(s):  
Gustavo A. Lyons ◽  
Silvia Quadrelli ◽  
Domingo J. Chimondeguy ◽  
Alejandro Iotti ◽  
Carlos Silva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document