scholarly journals Pathology of Laboratory Rats and Mice

1968 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 790-790
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Carbone

AbstractAlone among Western nations, the United States has a two-tier system for welfare protections for vertebrate animals in research. Because its Animal Welfare Act (AWA) excludes laboratory rats and mice (RM), government veterinarians do not inspect RM laboratories and RM numbers are only partially reported to government agencies1. Without transparent statistics, it is impossible to track efforts to reduce or replace these sentient animals’ use or to project government resources needed if AWA coverage were expanded to include them. I obtained annual RM usage data from 16 large American institutions and compared RM numbers to institutions’ legally-required reports of their AWA-covered mammals. RM comprised approximately 99.3% of mammals at these representative institutions. Extrapolating from 780,070 AWA-covered mammals in 2017–18, I estimate that 111.5 million rats and mice were used per year in this period. If the same proportion of RM undergo painful procedures as are publicly reported for AWA-covered animals, then some 44.5 million mice and rats underwent potentially painful experiments. These data inform the questions of whether the AWA needs an update to cover RM, or whether the NIH should increase transparency of funded animal research. These figures can benchmark progress in reducing animal numbers in general and more specifically, in painful experiments. This estimate is higher than any others available, reflecting the challenges of obtaining statistics without consistent and transparent institutional reports.


ILAR Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Joanna Makowska ◽  
Daniel M Weary

Abstract Most would agree that animals in research should be spared “unnecessary” harm, pain, or distress, and there is also growing interest in providing animals with some form of environmental enrichment. But is this the standard of care that we should aspire to? We argue that we need to work towards a higher standard—specifically, that providing research animals with a “good life” should be a prerequisite for their use. The aims of this paper are to illustrate our vision of a “good life” for laboratory rats and mice and to provide a roadmap for achieving this vision. We recognize that several research procedures are clearly incompatible with a good life but describe here what we consider to be the minimum day-to-day living conditions to be met when using rodents in research. A good life requires that animals can express a rich behavioral repertoire, use their abilities, and fulfill their potential through active engagement with their environment. In the first section, we describe how animals could be housed for these requirements to be fulfilled, from simple modifications to standard housing through to better cage designs and free-ranging options. In the second section, we review the types of interactions with laboratory rodents that are compatible with a good life. In the third section, we address the potential for the animals to have a life outside of research, including the use of pets in clinical trials (the animal-as-patient model) and the adoption of research animals to new homes when they are no longer needed in research. We conclude with a few suggestions for achieving our vision.


1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Grant ◽  
Patrick T. K. Woo

Experimental infections of Giardia-free laboratory rats and mice with their respective parasites (Giardia simoni in rats and Giardia muris in mice) demonstrated that the infections persisted for the duration of the study period (4 months). Similarly, naturally infected meadow voles (with Giardia microti) and deer mice (with Giardia peromysci) retained their infections during their captivity (6 months). Rigorous precautions were taken to prevent contamination and coprophagy. The relative numbers of cysts in consecutive faecal samples varied considerably and there were periods when the numbers of cysts were extremely low. The excretions of cysts were cyclical and there were periods of 7 and 8 days between peaks in laboratory rats and mice infected with G. simoni and G. muris respectively.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Gsell ◽  
John Innes ◽  
Pim de Monchy ◽  
Dianne Brunton

Context. Better techniques to detect small numbers of mammalian pests such as rodents are required both to complete large-scale eradications in restoration areas and to detect invaders before they become abundant or cause serious impacts on biodiversity. Aims. To evaluate the ability of certified rodent dogs (Canis familiaris) to locate Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) and mice (Mus musculus) or their scent trails at very low densities in field conditions. Methods. We experimentally tested two rodent dogs by releasing small numbers of laboratory rats and mice in a 63 ha rodent-free forest sanctuary and then determining if the dogs and their handlers could find the rodents and their scent trails. We divided the enclosure into two halves, east and west of the midpoint, and alternated releases daily between the two areas to minimise residual scent between consecutive trials. Radio-tagged rats or mice were released a total of 96 times at random locations that were unknown to handlers, followed for 50–100 m, then caught and either placed in hidden cages at the end of the scent trail or removed from the forest. Handlers and their dogs had up to 6 h to search for rodents. Key Results. Despite the extremely low density of rodents in the effective research area of 32 ha, both dogs were highly successful at finding rodents, together locating 87% of rats and 80% of mice. Handlers reported few false positive detections. We found that well-trained dogs can effectively cover 30–40 ha of steep forested habitat in half a day (6 h). Conclusions. Despite the limitations of our study design, we conclude that well-trained rodent dogs may be able to locate wild rodents at low densities in forest situations. Implications. Our results support the ongoing use of certified dogs to detect rodent survivors and invaders in conservation areas in New Zealand and elsewhere. Additional research is required to trial dogs on experimentally released wild rodents and to compare the cost-effectiveness of dogs with other detection methods.


1961 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth M. Lemcke

By means of a complement-fixation test of the sera of laboratory rats and mice, the immunological response of these animals to both naturally occurring and induced PPLO infections was determined, and the presence and extent of infection in the animals determined by culture.PPLO antibodies specific for the infecting strain were demonstrable in rats and mice from which PPLO were isolated.The amount of serum antibody rises with the extent and severity of the infection. Thus, young rats with PPLO infections confined to the nasopharynx had little or no antibody whereas the oldest rats with consolidated lungs had the highest titres. In mice too, the sera of those with pneumonia had the highest titres.The comparatively low titres found in rat bronchiectasis together with the failure to isolate PPLO from the spleen and other organs, suggest that the chronic form of the disease remains localized. This is in contrast to infections with rat polyarthritis and related PPLO in which the organisms can be isolated from the lymph nodes and other organs and in which antibody is present in high titre.In view of the high degree of correlation between the presence of antibodies to PPLO in the blood and the presence of PPLO in the tissue of rats and mice, it is suggested that specific antibody found in man is a significant indicator of PPLO infection.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Hestehave ◽  
Gordon Munro ◽  
Tina Brønnum Pedersen ◽  
Klas S P Abelson

Researchers performing experiments on animals should always strive towards the refinement of experiments, minimization of stress and provision of better animal welfare. An adequate analgesic strategy is important to improve post-operative recovery and welfare in laboratory rats and mice. In addition, it is desirable to provide post-operative analgesia using methods that are minimally invasive and stressful. This study investigated the antinociceptive effects of orally administered buprenorphine ingested in Nutella® in comparison with subcutaneous buprenorphine administration. By exposing the animal to a thermal stimulus using a hot plate, significant antinociceptive effects of voluntarily ingested buprenorphine administered in Nutella® were demonstrated. This was evident at doses of 1.0 mg/kg 60 and 120 min post administration ( P < 0.01), although antinociceptive effects were not as marked as with subcutaneous administration, and had a later onset. It is advised to administer the oral formulation of buprenorphine in Nutella® in a 10-fold higher dose, as well as approximately 60 min earlier, than with the more commonly employed subcutaneous route of administration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document