Both open and endoscopic gluteal tendon repairs lead to functional improvement with similar failure rates: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
pp. jisakos-2020-000474
Author(s):  
Robert Longstaffe ◽  
Patrick Dickerson ◽  
Charles A Thigpen ◽  
Ellen Shanley ◽  
Michael J Kissenberth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Endoscopic Repair ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Rehabilitation Protocols

ImportanceOperative treatment of gluteal tendon tears is becomingly increasingly more common with varying surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols.ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review of gluteal tendon repair as it relates to tear characteristics, rehabilitation protocols, patient-reported outcomes, satisfaction, resolution of gait deviation and complication rates.Evidence reviewA comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Embase/MEDLINE was used to identify all literature pertaining to gluteal tendon repair. A total of 389 articles were identified.FindingsA total of 22 studies (611 hips) were included in this review. The majority of tears were noted to be partial thickness (77.9% vs 22.1%). Both arthroscopic and open repair demonstrated improvements in functional outcomes. Within studies documenting gait deviation, 54% were noted to have gait deviation preoperatively, of which approximately 70% had resolution following repair. On average, abduction strength increased almost one whole grade (0.84) following repair. Overall complication rate was found to be 5.2% (20 of 388 hips). Endoscopic repair demonstrated a decreased complication rate compared with open (0.7% vs 7.8%). Retear rate was found to be 3.8%, with open repair having a slightly increased rate compared with endoscopic repair (3.4% vs 4.1%).Conclusions and relevanceThe majority of tears tend to be partial thickness with involvement of gluteus medius in almost all cases and concomitant involvement of gluteus minimus in close to half of cases. Both endoscopic and open gluteal tendon repairs resulted in improvements in outcomes and functional improvement. Retear rates were similar between the two repair techniques, while endoscopic repair demonstrated a lower complication rate.Level of evidenceLevel IV, systematic review.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Adolescents With a Subanalysis on Return to Sport: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1526-1534
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Chen ◽  
David R. Maldonado ◽  
Cammille C. Go ◽  
Cynthia Kyin ◽  
Ajay C. Lall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background: There is a plethora of literature on outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in the adult population; however, outcomes in the adolescent population have not been as widely reported. Additionally, as adolescents represent a very active population, it is imperative to understand their athletic activity and return to sport after hip arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To analyze patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip arthroscopic surgery in adolescents (aged 10-19 years) and present a return-to-sport analysis in the athletic adolescent subgroup. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify articles that reported PROs after hip arthroscopic surgery in adolescents. The standardized mean difference was calculated to compare the effect size of hip arthroscopic surgery on various PROs. For the athletic subgroup, a return-to-sport summary was also provided. Results: Ten studies, with 618 adolescent hips and a collective study period of December 2004 to February 2015, were included in this systematic review. Across all studies, the mean age was 15.8 years (range, 11.0-19.9 years), and female patients composed approximately 56.7% of the entire cohort. The mean follow-up was 34.5 months (range, 12-120 months). The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was reported in 9 studies, and at latest follow-up, scores were excellent in 4 studies (range, 90-95) and good in the remaining 5 studies (range, 82.1-89.6). All adolescents also showed significant improvement on the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), the HOS–Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), the physical component of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12P), a visual analog scale for pain (VAS), and both versions of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12 and iHOT-33) at latest follow-up ( P < .05). Further, mean improvements reported in all studies surpassed reported values of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state for the mHHS, HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-33. Finally, the collective return-to-sport rate among athletic adolescents was 84.9%. Conclusion: In the setting of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement, hip arthroscopic surgery can safely be performed in adolescents and leads to significant functional improvement. Furthermore, athletic adolescents return to sport at high levels after hip arthroscopic surgery.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Eleanor G. Burden ◽  
Timothy J. Batten ◽  
Christopher D. Smith ◽  
Jonathan P. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Cuff Tear ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Aims This systematic review asked which patterns of complications are associated with the three reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthetic designs, as classified by Routman et al, in patients undergoing RTSA for the management of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. The three implant design philosophies investigated were medial glenoid/medial humerus (MGMH), medial glenoid/lateral humerus (MGLH), and lateral glenoid/medial humerus (LGMH). Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed via a search of MEDLINE and Embase. Two reviewers extracted data on complication occurrence and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Meta-analysis was conducted on the reported proportion of complications, weighted by sample size, and PROMs were pooled using the reported standardized mean difference (SMD). Quality of methodology was assessed using Wylde’s non-summative four-point system. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020193041). Results A total of 42 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Rates of scapular notching were found to be significantly higher in MGMH implants (52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 40 to 63)) compared with MGLH ((18% (95% CI 6 to 34)) and LGMH (12% (95% CI 3 to 26)). Higher rates of glenoid loosening were seen in MGMH implants (6% (95% CI 3 to 10)) than in MGLH implants (0% (95% CI 0 to 2)). However, strength of evidence for this finding was low. No significant differences were identified in any other complication, and there were no significant differences observed in PROMs between implant philosophies. Conclusion This systematic review has found significant improvement in PROMS and low complication rates across the implant philosophies studied. Scapular notching was the only complication found definitely to have significantly higher prevalence with the MGMH implant design.

scholarly journals Mini-open double row gluteus medius repair provides good short-term functional outcomes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven DeFroda ◽  
Ariel Silverman ◽  
Matthew Quinn ◽  
Ramin Tabaddor
Keyword(s):  
Open Repair ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Visual Analogue Pain Scale ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
History Of ◽  
Anxiety Depression ◽  
Mini Open

Abstract Gluteus medius (GM) tears are recognized as a significant cause of lateral hip pain. While non-operative management can be effective, those who fail this treatment modality may be indicated for operative intervention. There is no widely agreed upon ‘gold standard’ technique with regards to open, mini-open and endoscopic repair. Our study prospectively enrolled 31 patients undergoing the authors preferred ‘mini-open’ repair technique with patients completing pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the form of the Modified Harris Hip Score, Visual Analogue pain Scale, Hip Outcomes Score for Activities of Daily Living and Hip Outcomes Score for Sports-Related Activities (HOS-SSS). The effect of anxiety/depression on outcomes was also examined. Patients had an average follow-up of 6 months. There was a statistically significant increase in all PROMs in the 31 patients undergoing mini-open repair. A sub-group of patients with self-reported history of anxiety/depression via patient intake paperwork experienced less improvement than those without, however this cohort still had significant improvement in all categories except HOS-SSS. Our study shows that a mini-open GM repair technique provides good patient reported outcomes at 6 months, and allows for improved cosmesis compared with traditional open techniques utilizing a larger surgical incision. It is important to counsel patients with a history of anxiety/depression that while they can expect significant functional improvement, that their improvement may be less than patients without these comorbidities.

Arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomies: a systematic review of surgical technique and outcomes

2020 ◽  
pp. 112070002097051
Author(s):  
Remy Coulomb ◽  
Bastien Nougarede ◽  
Etienne Maury ◽  
Philippe Marchand ◽  
Olivier Mares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Central Compartment ◽  
Direct Access ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Lesser Trochanter ◽  
Loss Of Strength

Purpose: To evaluate the technique, results and complications of arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomies either on native hips or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A systematic review was performed using 3 databases: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library from January 2000 to December 2018 in accordance with the PRISMA procedure. The literature search, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Surgical technique, clinical outcomes, recurrences and complication rate were evaluated. Results: Out of 115 articles reviewed, 20 articles concerned native hips and 8 articles THA. 3 levels of release were described. For native hips, the recurrence rate was higher for central compartment than peripheral or lesser trochanter releases. Complication rates were similar for hip arthroscopy but remained low in all series. Loss of strength was evaluated mainly using the MRC muscle scale. Most studies noted strength recovery. MRI analysis of muscle atrophy was greater for lesser trochanter than for central compartment release but unrelated to loss of strength. The complication rate was low for tenotomy after THA, heterotopic ossification being the most common complication. Conclusions: Central compartment releases lead to the highest rate of recurrence due to incomplete release. Peripheral releases have a potential risk of vascular injury. The lesser trochanteric approach has the disadvantage of not having direct access to the joint. The main difficulty with THA lies in the diagnosis of cup/iliopsoas impingement. Diagnostic tests with infiltration should be made before iliopsoas release to prevent its failure. Cup protrusion of over 8mm is a potential indication for acetabular revision.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes and Complications With Open vs Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 247301142110600
Author(s):  
Kristin C. Caolo ◽  
Stephanie K. Eble ◽  
Carson Rider ◽  
Andrew J. Elliott ◽  
Constantine A. Demetracopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Sural Nerve ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Suture Repair ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Achilles Tendon Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Acute Rupture

Background: There is no current consensus on whether to use an open or minimally invasive (MIS) approach for Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture. We hypothesized that patients in both open and MIS groups would have improved patient-reported outcome scores using the PROMIS system postoperatively, but that there would be minimal differences in these scores and complication rates between operative techniques. Methods: A total of 185 patients who underwent surgery for an acute, unilateral Achilles tendon rupture between January 2016 and June 2019, with minimum 1-year follow-up were included in the cohort studied. The minimally invasive group was defined by use of a commercially available minimally invasive device through a smaller surgical incision (n=118). The open repair group did not use the device, and suture repair was performed through larger surgical incisions (n=67). Postoperative protocols were similar between groups. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores were collected prospectively through our institution’s registry. Demographics and complications were recorded. Results: PROMIS scores overall improved in both study groups after operative repair. No significant differences in postoperative PROMIS scores were observed between the open and MIS repair groups. There were also no significant differences in complication rates between groups. Overall, 19.5% of patients in the MIS group had at least 1 postoperative complication (8.5% deep vein thrombosis [DVT], 3.3% rerupture, 1.7% sural nerve injury, 2.5% infection), compared to 16.4% in the open group (9.0% DVT, 1.5% rerupture, 1.5% sural nerve injury, 0% infection). Conclusion: Patients undergoing either minimally invasive or open Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture have similar PROMIS outcomes and complication types and incidences. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Complications Related to Latarjet Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110423
Author(s):  
Chul-Hyun Cho ◽  
Sang Soo Na ◽  
Byung-Chan Choi ◽  
Du-Han Kim
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Intraoperative Complication

Background: In cases of recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a glenoid defect, Latarjet procedures are widely used for stabilization. Although complications with this procedure have been reported, few studies have comprehensively analyzed issues related to the Latarjet procedure. Purpose: To identify the overall complication rate of the Latarjet procedure used for anterior shoulder instability and to compare the rate of complications between arthroscopic and open approaches. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed by using the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Data on complications were extracted and classified as intraoperative, postoperative, or instability-related for further analysis. Quality assessments were performed with criteria from the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS). A quantitative synthesis of data was conducted to compare the complication rates between arthroscopic and open approaches. Results: A total of 35 articles were included in this analysis. The MINORS score was 11.89. A total 2560 Latarjet procedures (2532 patients) were included. The overall complication rate was 16.1% (n = 412). The intraoperative complication rate was 3.4% (n = 87) and included a 1.9% (n = 48) incidence of nerve injuries and a 1.0% (n = 25) incidence of iatrogenic fractures. Screw problems, vascular injuries, and conversion arthroscopic to open surgery each occurred at a rate of <1%. The postoperative complication rate was 6.5% (n = 166), and the most common complication was nonunion (1.3%; n = 33). The instability-related complication rate was 6.2% (n = 159) and included a 1.5% (n = 38) rate of redislocation, a 2.9% (n = 75) rate of positive apprehension test, and a 1.0% (n = 26) rate of instability. Overall, 2.6% (n = 66) of patients required an unplanned secondary operation after the initial surgery. The arthroscopic approach was associated with a higher rate of intraoperative complications compared with the open approach (5.0% vs 2.9%; P =.020) and a lower rate of instability-related complications (3.1% vs 7.2%; P < .001). Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability results in an overall complication rate of 16.1% and a reoperation rate of 2.6%. However, serious complications at short-term follow-up appear rare. When the arthroscopic approach was used, the rate of intraoperative complications was higher, although instability-related complications were lower when compared with the open approach.

Flexor Tendon Repair Rehabilitation Protocols: A Systematic Review

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1712-1717.e14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harlan M. Starr ◽  
Mark Snoddy ◽  
Kyle E. Hammond ◽  
John G. Seiler
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Flexor Tendon Repair ◽  
Rehabilitation Protocols

Vascularized Bone Grafting for Reconstruction of Oncologic Defects in the Spine: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of the Literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (09) ◽  
pp. 708-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Pedreira ◽  
Charalampos Siotos ◽  
Brian Cho ◽  
Stella Seal ◽  
Deepa Bhat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Spinal Tumors ◽  
Johns Hopkins Hospital ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Spinal Reconstruction ◽  
Vascularized Bone

Background Resection of primary spinal tumors requires reconstruction for restoration of spinal column stability. Traditionally, some combination of bone grafting and instrumentation is implemented. However, delayed healing environments are associated with pseudoarthrodesis and failure. Implementation of vascularized bone grafting (VBG) to complement hardware may present a solution. We evaluated the use of VBG in oncologic spinal reconstruction via systematic review and pooled analysis of literature. Methods We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus for studies published through September 2017 according to the PRISMA guidelines and performed a pooled analysis of studies with n > 5. Additionally, we performed retrospective review of patients at the Johns Hopkins Hospital that received spinal reconstruction with VBG. Results We identified 21 eligible studies and executed a pooled analysis of 12. Analysis indicated an 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–1.03) rate of successful union when VBG is employed after primary tumor resection. The overall complication rate was 42% (95% CI: 0.23–0.61) and reoperation rate was 27% (95% CI: 0.12–0.41) in the pooled cohort. Wound complication rate was 18% (95% CI: 0.11–0.26). Fifteen out of 209 patients (7.2%) had instrumentation failure and mean time-to-union was 6 months. Consensus in the literature and in the patients reviewed is that introduction of VBG into irradiated or infected tissue beds proves advantageous given decreased resorption, increased load bearing, and faster consolidation. Downsides to this technique included longer operations, donor-site morbidity, and difficulty in coordinating care. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that complication rates using VBG are similar to those reported in studies using non-VBG for similar spinal reconstructions; however, fusion rates are better. Given rapid fusion and possible hardware independence, VBG may be useful in reconstructing defects in patients with longer life expectancies and/or with a history of chemoradiation and/or infection at the site of tumor resection.

scholarly journals Is Delayed Weightbearing After Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Knee Associated With Better Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711877098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Kraeutler ◽  
John W. Belk ◽  
Trevor J. Carver ◽  
Eric C. McCarty
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Rehabilitation Protocols ◽  
Chondrocyte Implantation ◽  
Autologous Chondrocyte

Background: Proper rehabilitation after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) is essential to restore a patient’s normal function without overloading the repair site. Purpose: To evaluate the current literature to assess clinical outcomes of MACI in the knee based on postoperative rehabilitation protocols, namely, the time to return to full weightbearing (WB). Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A systematic review was performed to locate studies of level 1 evidence comparing the outcomes of patients who underwent MACI with a 6-week, 8-week, or 10/11-week time period to return to full WB. Patient-reported outcomes assessed included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity scale, Short Form Health Survey–36 (SF-36), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain frequency and severity. Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 136 patients (138 lesions) who underwent MACI. Treatment failure had occurred in 0.0% of patients in the 6-week group, 7.5% in the 8-week group, and 8.3% in the 10/11-week group at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years ( P = .46). KOOS, SF-36, and VAS scores in each group improved significantly from preoperatively to follow-up ( P < .001). Conclusion: Patients undergoing MACI in the knee can be expected to experience improvement in clinical outcomes with the rehabilitation protocols outlined in this work. No significant differences were seen in failure rates based on the time to return to full WB.

Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Techniques: A Systematic Review

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472199801
Author(s):  
Harrison Faulkner ◽  
Vincent An ◽  
Richard D. Lawson ◽  
David J. Graham ◽  
Brahman S. Sivakumar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
English Language ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Sample Proportion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
End Stage

Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis is a salvage option in the management of end-stage PIPJ arthropathy. Numerous techniques have been described, including screws, Kirschner wires, tension band wiring, intramedullary devices, and plate fixation. There remains no consensus as to the optimum method, and no recent summary of the literature exists. A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. English-language articles reporting PIPJ arthrodesis outcomes were included and presented in a systematic review. Pearson χ2 and 2-sample proportion tests were used to compare fusion time, nonunion rate, and complication rate between arthrodesis techniques. The mean fusion time ranged from 5.1 to 12.9 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in fusion time between arthrodesis techniques. Nonunion rates ranged from 0.0% to 33.3%. Screw arthrodesis demonstrated a lower nonunion rate than wire fusion (3.0% and 8.5% respectively; P = .01). Complication rates ranged from 0.0% to 22.1%. Aside from nonunions, there were no statistically significant differences in complication rates between arthrodesis techniques. The available PIPJ arthrodesis techniques have similar fusion time, nonunion rate, and complication rate outcomes. The existing data have significant limitations, and further research would be beneficial to elucidate any differences between techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document