scholarly journals Intratumoral OH2, an oncolytic herpes simplex virus 2, in patients with advanced solid tumors: a multicenter, phase I/II clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e002224
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Jing Huang ◽  
Jialin Tang ◽  
Sheng Hu ◽  
Suxia Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Intratumoral Injection ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Simplex Virus

BackgroundOH2 is a genetically engineered oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 2 designed to selectively amplify in tumor cells and express granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to enhance antitumor immune responses. We investigated the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of OH2 as single agent or in combination with HX008, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsIn this multicenter, phase I/II trial, we enrolled patients with standard treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors who have injectable lesions. In phase I, patients received intratumoral injection of OH2 at escalating doses (106, 107 and 108CCID50/mL) as single agent or with fixed-dose HX008. The recommended doses were then expanded in phase II. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability defined by the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in phase I, and antitumor activity assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) and immune-RECIST in phase II.ResultsBetween April 17, 2019 and September 22, 2020, 54 patients with metastatic cancers were enrolled. Forty patients were treated with single agent OH2, and 14 with OH2 plus HX008. No DLTs were reported with single agent OH2 in phase I. Four patients, having metastatic mismatch repair-proficient rectal cancer or metastatic esophageal cancer, achieved immune-partial response, with two from the single agent cohort and two from the combination cohort. The duration of response were 11.25+ and 14.03+ months for the two responders treated with single agent OH2, and 1.38+ and 2.56+ months for the two responders in the combination cohort. The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with single agent OH2 was fever (n=18, 45.0%). All TRAEs were of grade 1–2, except one case of grade 3 fever in the 108CCID50/mL group. No treatment-related serious AEs occurred. Single agent OH2 induced alterations in the tumor microenvironment, with clear increases in CD3+ and CD8+ cell density and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in the patients’ post-treatment biopsies relative to baseline.ConclusionsIntratumoral injection of OH2 was well-tolerated, and demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with metastatic esophageal and rectal cancer. Further clinical development of OH2 as single agent or with immune checkpoint inhibitors in selected tumor types is warranted.

scholarly journals 412 First-in-human phase I/IIa trial to evaluate the safety and initial clinical activity of DuoBody®-PD-L1×4–1BB (GEN1046) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A437-A437
Author(s):  
Elena Garralda ◽  
Ravit Geva ◽  
Eytan Ben-Ami ◽  
Corinne Maurice-Dror ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Dose Levels

BackgroundAgonistic 4-1BB monoclonal antibodies were preclinically validated as promising cancer immunotherapies, both as monotherapy and as potentiators of the activity of PD-(L)1–blocking agents. However, toxicity and a narrow therapeutic window have hampered their clinical development. DuoBody-PD­-L1×4-1BB, a first-in-class, bispecific, next-generation checkpoint immunotherapy, was designed to overcome these limitations by activating T cells through conditional 4-1BB costimulation, while simultaneously blocking the PD-L1 axis. We present preliminary data from the ongoing, first-in-human, open-label, phase I/IIa trial of DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB in advanced solid tumors (NCT03917381).MethodsDuring dose escalation, patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors not eligible for standard therapy received flat-dose DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB (25–1200 mg) intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic parameters and antitumor activity (RECIST 1.1). Pharmacodynamic biomarkers and antitumor activity (iRECIST) were assessed as exploratory endpoints.ResultsAs of June 22, 2020, 61 patients were enrolled (median age: 59 years). The most common cancer types were colorectal (19.7%), ovarian (14.8%), pancreatic (9.8%), and NSCLC (9.8%). Patients had previously received a median (range) of 3 (1–11) treatments; 44.2% had prior anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. Patients received a median (range) of 4 (1–15) treatment cycles; Cmax was observed shortly after the end of infusion (mean T½: 2.3–10.3 days). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 6 patients experienced DLTs. The most common (=10%) treatment-related AEs (all grades; grades 3–4) were transaminase elevation (24.6%; 9.8%), hypothyroidism (16.4%; 1.6%), and fatigue (13.1%; 1.6%). Treatment-related grade-3 transaminase elevations decreased upon corticosteroid administration; no treatment-related bilirubin increases or grade-4 transaminase elevations occurred. Disease control, including stable disease at first assessment and partial responses in triple-negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–pretreated NSCLC, occurred in 40/61 patients (65.6%). Pharmacologic activity, as measured by modulation of adaptive immunity mediators, was observed across a broad range of dose levels. Peripheral proliferating (Ki67+) CD8+ effector memory T cells and serum interferon-gamma levels showed maximum induction relative to baseline (p=0.01) 8 days following treatment.ConclusionsDuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB demonstrated biologic activity and a manageable safety profile. Encouraging early clinical activity across different dose levels was observed in a heavily pretreated population with advanced solid tumors, including those resistant to prior immunotherapy or typically less sensitive to ICIs. Expansion cohorts of patients for whom DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB treatment could be relevant and biologically sound have started enrollment. Updated data will be presented.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Manish Gupta, Lei Pang, and Thomas Breuer at Genmab A/S; Alice Bexon, Alexander Muik, and Friederike Gieseke at BioNTech SE; and Zuzana Jirakova (formerly at BioNTech SE) for their valuable contributions. This trial was funded by Genmab A/S and BioNTech SE.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov; trial number: NCT03917381Ethics ApprovalThis trial is undertaken following full approval of the final protocol, amendments, informed consent form, applicable recruiting materials, and subject compensation programs by the Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board.ConsentWritten informed consent, in accordance with principles that originated in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, current ICH guidelines including ICH-GCP E6(R2), applicable regulatory requirements, and sponsor policy, was provided by the patients.

A phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Christopher T. Chen ◽  
Yvan LeBruchec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of the Pi3K&Agr; Inhibitor Byl719, As a Single Agent in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors (Ast)

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv150 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Juric ◽  
H. Burris ◽  
M. Schuler ◽  
J. Schellens ◽  
J. Berlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

Abstract A167: A phase I study of single-agent BEZ235 (SDS sachet), once- or twice-daily, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichiro Watanabe ◽  
Hironobu Minami ◽  
Satoshi Otsu ◽  
Yoshinori Hirashima ◽  
Ryotaro Morinaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

scholarly journals Phase I study of single-agent ribociclib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
Becker Hewes ◽  
Tomoyuki Kakizume ◽  
Takeshi Tajima ◽  
Norifumi Ishikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors

Phase I study of ispinesib in combination with carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2027-2027 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. F. Jones ◽  
E. R. Plummer ◽  
H. A. Burris ◽  
A. R. Razak ◽  
A. A. Meluch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Platinum Compound ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Carboplatin Auc

2027 Background: Kinesin spindle protein (KSP) is required for establishment of mitotic spindle bipolarity and cell cycle progression. Ispinesib (SB-715992), a KSP inhibitor, blocks assembly of a functional mitotic spindle leading to G2/M arrest. Carboplatin is a platinum compound that produces predominantly interstrand DNA cross-links. In vivo combination of a platinum-containing agent (cisplatin) and ispinesib resulted in synergistic activity and an increase in maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ispinesib. In a phase I study of single agent ispinesib on a once every 21-day schedule, the MTD was 18 mg/m2 with prolonged gr 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia as DLTs. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, PS ≤ 1, and ≤ 3 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible for this study. Escalating doses of carboplatin (AUC 4-6) were administered over 30 minutes followed by a 1-hour infusion of escalating doses of ispinesib (9– 21 mg/m2) on a 21-day schedule. At least 3 pts were treated at each dose level. The primary objectives of this study included characterizing safety and tolerability and defining the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR). Limited pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were obtained. Clinical response assessments per RECIST criteria were performed every 2 cycles. Results: 24 pts [15 M/9 F; median age 63yrs, ECOG PS 1], were treated at 6 dose levels. The most common tumor types were prostate (7) and breast (4). A median of 3 cycles were administered (range 1–7; total 75 cycles). In 17 pts, the most common toxicities were (# pts, [grade]): nausea (10, Gr 1–2), vomiting (8, Gr 1–3), fatigue (8, Gr 1–2), neutropenia (8, Gr 2–4), anemia (7, Gr 1–3), and thrombocytopenia (7, Gr 1–4). Gr 4 thrombocytopenia was the observed DLT in 2 pts [ispinesib (mg/m2)/carboplatin (mg/ml·min) (# pts): 15/6 (1); 18/6 (1). PK assessment of ispinesib and carboplatin will be completed when the OTR has been defined. Unconfirmed minor responses have been observed in 3 pts (breast, prostate, NSCLC) starting at doses of 18/6. Conclusions: Determination of an OTR is ongoing. Ispinesib doses ≥ single agent MTD when combined with carboplatin AUC 6 have an acceptable tolerability profile and demonstrate preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. [Table: see text]

A phase I dose escalation study of oral MK-2206 (allosteric Akt inhibitor) with oral selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142866) (MEK 1/2 inhibitor) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13599-e13599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khurum Hayat Khan ◽  
Li Yan ◽  
Janusz Mezynski ◽  
Amita Patnaik ◽  
Victor Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Akt Inhibitor ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Simultaneous Inhibition ◽  
Investigational Agents ◽  
Dose Levels

e13599 Background: Simultaneous inhibition of both the PI3K-Akt and RAF/MEK/ERK pathways may yield greater benefits than inhibiting either pathway alone. This phase I study (NCT01021748) examined the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), maximal tolerated dose (MTD), and preliminary antitumor activity of the combination of a MEKi (selumetinib) and AKTi (MK-2206). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors were treated with MK-2206 either every other day (QOD) or once weekly (QW), in combination with selumetinib administered either once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID). Results: 51 pts with advanced solid tumors (15 colon, 8 NSCLC, 6 ovarian, 5 pancreatic, 3 breast and 14 others) were treated across 9 dose levels. There were 2 confirmed partial response (PR) (1 NSCLC, ongoing > 52 wks; 1 ovarian, on treatment for 47 weeks; both KRAS mutation positive), 1 unconfirmed PR (pancreatic, on treatment 20 wks), and 24 pts with stable disease (ranged from 6 to 47 wks). Preliminary assessment of PK data suggested no apparent drug-drug interactions with unaltered PK profiles of each drug when administered in combination. Conclusions: In combination the maximum tolerated doses of MK-2206 and selumetinib are 135 mg QW and 100 mg QD, respectively. This combination of investigational agents demonstrated preliminary antitumor activity in pts with advanced cancer. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document