scholarly journals 398 neoIRX: a phase II trial of locoregional cytokine therapy to promote immunologic priming and clinical response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A430-A430
Author(s):  
Katherine Sanchez ◽  
Alison Conlin ◽  
Parvin Peddi ◽  
Sasha Stanton ◽  
Janet Ruzich ◽  
...  

BackgroundBackground: The FDA has approved pembrolizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel [ACT], and carboplatin) for stage II/III TNBC, on the basis of improved event free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the Keynote-522 study.1 Novel combination immunotherapy strategies may further improve outcomes and allow the opportunity to de-escalate the chemotherapy backbone, potentially mitigating grade III/IV toxicities which occurred in 81% of recipients. We have previously reported safety and feasibility of pre-operative IRX-2, a novel cytokine biotherapeutic, that is administered locoregionally in the peri-areolar tissue to enhance the immune microenvironment within the sentinel lymph nodes, the putative site of antigen presentation.2 In this phase Ib study, pre-operative IRX-2 was safe and was associated with increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs, by H&E and multispectral immunofluorescence [mIF]), PD-L1 expression (Ventana SP142 assay, mIF), and lymphocyte activation (by RNA sequencing). Similar effects were observed in a pre-operative head and neck carcinoma trial. These findings support further study of IRX-2 in combination with anti-PD-1 in early stage TNBC.MethodsMethodsneoIRX is an open-label, phase II trial to evaluate the clinical and immunological activity of induction IRX-2 plus pembrolizumab, followed by de-escalated chemotherapy (ACT) and pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy in TNBC. Patients are randomized to receive pembrolizumab induction (single dose 200mg IV, n=15), versus pembrolizumab + IRX-2 induction (1mL SQ x 2 daily, x 10 days, n=15), followed by research biopsy. All patients will then receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus ACT every three 3 weeks. Eligible subjects will have previously untreated, resectable stage II/III TNBC. The primary endpoint is pCR. The secondary endpoint is safety. On-treatment biopsies will permit a prospective, randomized validation of previously reported immunomodulatory effects of IRX-2 (sTILs, PD-L1, lymphocyte RNA signatures). As of 7/28/2021, n=7/30 subjects are enrolled (Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, Providence St. John’s Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, Baylor Medicine, Houston, TX).Trial RegistrationNCT04373031ReferencesSchmid PN. Engl J Med 2020; 382:810–821.Page DB. Clinical Cancer Research 26.7(2020):1595–1605.Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol was approved by the Providence Portland Medical Center IRB committee and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards established by the Declaration of Helsinki, PH&S IRB# 2019000486. Written informed consent was obtained for all trial participants.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e0235381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabella Picinin Safe ◽  
Marcus Vinícius Guimarães Lacerda ◽  
Vitoria Silva Printes ◽  
Adriana Ferreira Praia Marins ◽  
Amanda Lia Rebelo Rabelo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Amaral ◽  
Heike Niessner ◽  
Tobias Sinnberg ◽  
Ioannis Thomas ◽  
Andreas Meiwes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) still carry a dismal prognosis. Preclinical data originated in xenograft models showed that buparlisib therapy was highly effective in therapy-naïve MBM. Patients and Methods In this open-label, phase II trial, we investigate the safety and efficacy of monotherapy with buparlisib, a PI3K inhibitor, in patients with asymptomatic MBM who were not candidates for local therapy. These patients had also progressed under immunotherapy if BRAF wild-type or under targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors if carrying a BRAFV600E/K mutation. The primary endpoint was the intracranial disease control rate assessed by the investigators. The secondary endpoints were overall response rate, duration of response (DOR) of intracranial disease, overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability of buparlisib. Results A total of 20 patients were screened and 17 patients were treated with buparlisib. Twelve patients had progressed under more than 2 systemic therapy lines and 17 had received at least 1 previous local therapy. There were no intracranial responses. Three patients achieved intracranial stable disease; the median DOR was 117 days. The median PFS was 42 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23–61 days) and the median OS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.24–7.76 months). No new safety signs were observed. Conclusions Buparlisib was well tolerated but no intracranial responses were observed. These results might be explained in part by the inclusion of only heavily pretreated patients. However, preclinical data strongly support the rationale to explore PI3K inhibitor-based combinations in patients with MBM displaying hyperactivation of the PI3K–AKT pathway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document