Long-term treatment with leuprorelin for spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy: natural history-controlled study

2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (12) ◽  
pp. 1026-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Hashizume ◽  
Masahisa Katsuno ◽  
Keisuke Suzuki ◽  
Akihiro Hirakawa ◽  
Yasuhiro Hijikata ◽  
...  
1986 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauri K. Toivonen ◽  
Markku S. Nieminen ◽  
Vesa Manninen ◽  
M Heikki Frick

2017 ◽  
Vol 381 ◽  
pp. 205-206
Author(s):  
A. Hashizume ◽  
M. Katsuno ◽  
K. Suzuki ◽  
A. Hirakawa ◽  
Y. Hijikata ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 181 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Klysner ◽  
Jesper Bent-Hansen ◽  
Hanne L. Hansen ◽  
Marianne Lunde ◽  
Elisabeth Pleidrup ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe highly recurrent nature of major depression in the young and the elderly warrants long-term antidepressant treatment.AimsTo compare the prophylactic efficacy of citalopram and placebo in elderly patients; to evaluate long-term tolerability of citalopram.MethodOut-patients, ⩾65 years, with unipolar major depression (DSM – IV: 296.2 x or 296.3 x) and Montgomery – Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score ⩾22 were treated with citalopram 20–40 mg for 8 weeks. Responders continued on their final fixed dose of citalopram for 16 weeks before randomisation to double-blind treatment with citalopram or placebo for at least 48 weeks.ResultsNineteen of the 60 patients using citalopram v. 41 of the 61 patients using placebo had recurrence. Time to recurrence was significantly different between citalopram— and placebo-patients, in favour of citalopram (log-rank test, P < 0.0001). Long-term treatment was well tolerated.ConclusionsLong-term treatment with citalopram is effective in preventing recurrence of depression in the elderly and is well tolerated.


Drugs in R&D ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-45
Author(s):  
Bruno Frediani ◽  
Carmela Toscano ◽  
Paolo Falsetti ◽  
Antonella Nicosia ◽  
Serena Pierguidi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Kavanaugh ◽  
Philip J. Mease ◽  
Andreas M. Reimold ◽  
Hasan Tahir ◽  
Jürgen Rech ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Winblad ◽  
K. Engedal ◽  
H. Soininen ◽  
F. Verhey ◽  
G. Waldemar ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil versus placebo over 1 year in patients with mild to moderate AD.Methods: Patients (n = 286; mean age, 72.5 years) with possible or probable AD from five Northern European countries were randomized to receive either donepezil (n = 142; 5 mg/day for 28 days, followed by 10 mg/day) or placebo (n = 144) for 1 year.Results: The study was completed by 66.9% of the donepezil- and 67.4% of the placebo-treated patients. The benefit of donepezil over placebo was demonstrated by the Gottfries-Bråne-Steen (a global assessment for rating dementia symptoms) total score at weeks 24, 36, and 52 (p < 0.05) and at the study end point (week 52, last observation carried forward; p = 0.054). Advantages of donepezil over placebo were also observed in cognition and activities of daily living (ADL) assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination at weeks 24, 36, and 52, and the end point (p < 0.02) and by the Progressive Deterioration Scale at week 52 and the end point (p < 0.05). Adverse events (AE) were recorded for 81.7% of donepezil- and 75.7% of placebo-treated patients, with 7% of donepezil- and 6.3% of placebo-treated patients discontinuing because of AE. Treatment response to donepezil was not predicted by APOE genotype or sex in this population.Conclusion: As the first 1-year, multinational, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of a cholinesterase inhibitor in AD, these data support donepezil as a well tolerated and effective long-term treatment for patients with AD, with benefits over placebo on global assessment, cognition, and ADL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document