scholarly journals Non-convulsive status epilepticus: usefulness of clinical features in selecting patients for urgent EEG

2003 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Husain ◽  
G J Horn ◽  
M P Jacobson
Keyword(s):  
Status Epilepticus ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Convulsive Status Epilepticus

Clinical features of convulsive status epilepticus: a study of 220 cases in western China

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Chen ◽  
B. Zhou ◽  
J. M. Li ◽  
Y. Zhu ◽  
J. H. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Status Epilepticus ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Western China ◽  
Convulsive Status Epilepticus

scholarly journals Clinical features and prognostic factors for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency department: A retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohyun Eun ◽  
Hye Eun Kwon ◽  
Heoung Jin Kim ◽  
Seo Hee Yoon ◽  
Moon Kyu Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Status Epilepticus ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Convulsive Status Epilepticus ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Department ◽  
First Line ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Icu Management ◽  
The Brain

Abstract Background: Uncontrolled seizures cause damage to all organs, especially the brain. Although there are guidelines regarding the management of status epilepticus (SE) involving motor seizures, the timing for administering first-line rescue medications (RMeds) remains unclear. Therefore, we analyzed patients with persistent SE lasting for >30 min and who visited the pediatric emergency department (pED) to determine clinical features and risk factors and provide directions for management on arrival to the pED. Methods: This study was conducted by retrospectively reviewing medical charts of patients aged 0–19 years who were diagnosed with SE accompanying motor seizures and who visited the pED between January 2010 and December 2019. After pED arrival, patients were divided into two groups, namely ≥30 min (n = 12) and <30 min (n = 13), according to the additional seizure time and receipt of the first dose of RMeds before and after 5 min.Results: Seizures lasting for <30 min were mainly observed for the etiology of idiopathic SE in the pED. Among four SE patients who needed intensive care unit (ICU) management, three had delayed administration of RMeds of more than 5 min, which was statistically significant because more hospitalizations in the ICU were observed when RMed administration was delayed. (p = 0.047). In acute symptomatic SE such as encephalitis, more than three doses of RMeds were needed to stop seizures.Conclusions: Patients with convulsive status epilepticus should receive RMeds after arrival at the pED.

Clinical features of catatonic non-convulsive status epilepticus: A systematic review of cases

2021 ◽  
pp. 110660
Author(s):  
Kamiyu Ogyu ◽  
Shin Kurose ◽  
Hiroyuki Uchida ◽  
Kousuke Kanemoto ◽  
Masaru Mimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Status Epilepticus ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Convulsive Status Epilepticus

scholarly journals Emergency management of the paediatric patient with convulsive status epilepticus

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-57
Author(s):  
Kyle C McKenzie ◽  
Cecil D Hahn ◽  
Jeremy N Friedman
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Status Epilepticus ◽  
Emergency Management ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Convulsive Status Epilepticus ◽  
Pharmacological Management ◽  
The Past ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
New Evidence

Abstract This guideline addresses the emergency management of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) in children and infants older than 1 month of age. It replaces a previous position statement from 2011, and includes a new treatment algorithm and table of recommended medications based on new evidence and reflecting the evolution of clinical practice over the past several years. This statement emphasizes the importance of timely pharmacological management of CSE, and includes some guidance for diagnostic approach and supportive care.

Salzburg Criteria, A Useful Tool in Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 155005942199171
Author(s):  
Adriana Gómez Domínguez ◽  
Raidili C. Mateo Montero ◽  
Alba Díaz Cid ◽  
Antonio J. P. Mazarro ◽  
Ignacio R. Bailly-Bailliere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Status Epilepticus ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Original Description ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Convulsive Status Epilepticus ◽  
Poor Outcome

Introduction. Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) has been traditionally a challenging electroencephalographic (EEG) diagnosis. For this reason, Salzburg consensus criteria (SCC) have been proposed to facilitate correct diagnosis. Methods. We retrospectively reanalyzed 41 cases referred to our department (from 2016 to 2018) under the suspicion of NCSE. In this study, we compared the original description (standard criteria) versus the updated description (SCC) of the same EEG. Results. Originally, 15 patients were diagnosed as NCSE (37%) and 26 patients as no NCSE (63%), using the standard criteria. Then, we analyzed EEGs according to the SCC, which led to the following results: 9 patients fulfilled the criteria for definite NCSE (22%), 20 patients were diagnosed as possible NCSE (49%) and 12 patients were diagnosed as no NCSE (29%). Subsequently, when we analyze the outcome of possible NCSE cases, we note that 50% of these patients presented mild-poor outcome (neurological deficits, deceased). Indeed, we observed worse outcomes in patients previously diagnosed as no NCSE and untreated, specifically post-anoxic cases. Conclusions. Salzburg criteria seem to be a useful tool to support NCSE diagnosis, introducing the category of possible NCSE. In our study, we observed that it contributes to improving the prognosis and management of the patients. However, more prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the accuracy of SCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document