scholarly journals Medicare expenditures for elderly patients undergoing surgical clipping or endovascular intervention for unruptured cerebral aneurysms

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimon Bekelis ◽  
Dan Gottlieb ◽  
Yin Su ◽  
Nicos Labropoulos ◽  
George Bovis ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe cost difference between the two treatment options (surgical clipping and endovascular therapy) for unruptured cerebral aneurysms remains an issue of debate. We investigated the association between treatment method for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and Medicare expenditures in elderly patients.MethodsWe performed a cohort study of 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data for elderly patients who underwent treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms from 2007 to 2012. In order to control for measured confounding we used multivariable regression analysis with mixed effects to account for clustering at the Hospital Referral Region (HRR) level. An instrumental variable (regional rates of endovascular treatment) analysis was used to control for unmeasured confounding by creating pseudo-randomization on the treatment method.ResultsDuring the study period 8705 patients underwent treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 2585 (29.7%) had surgical clipping and 6120 (70.3%) had endovascular treatment. The median total Medicare expenditures in the first year after the admission for the procedure were $46 800 (IQR $31 000–$74 400) for surgical clipping and $48 100 (IQR $34 500–$73 900) for endovascular therapy. When we adjusted for unmeasured confounders, using an instrumental variable analysis, clipping was associated with increased 7-day Medicare expenditures by $3527 (95% CI $972 to $5736) and increased 1-year Medicare expenditures by $15 984 (95% CI $9017 to $22 951).ConclusionsIn a cohort of Medicare patients, after controlling for unmeasured confounding, we demonstrated that surgical clipping of unruptured cerebral aneurysms was associated with increased 1-year expenditures compared with endovascular treatment.

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 805-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimon Bekelis ◽  
Daniel J. Gottlieb ◽  
Yin Su ◽  
Giuseppe Lanzino ◽  
Michael T. Lawton ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE The impact of treatment method—surgical clipping or endovascular coiling—on the cost of care for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is debated. Here, the authors investigated the association between treatment method and long-term Medicare expenditures in elderly patients with aneurysmal SAH. METHODS The authors performed a cohort study of 100% of the Medicare fee-for-service claims data for elderly patients who had undergone treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysms in the period from 2007 to 2012. To control for measured confounding, the authors used propensity score–adjusted multivariable regression analysis with mixed effects to account for clustering at the hospital referral region (HRR) level. An instrumental variable (regional rates of coiling) analysis was used to control for unmeasured confounding by creating pseudo-randomization on the treatment method. RESULTS During the study period, 3210 patients underwent treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysms and met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 1206 (37.6%) had surgical clipping and 2004 (62.4%) had endovascular coiling. The median total Medicare expenditures in the 1st year after admission for SAH were $113,000 (IQR $77,500–$182,000) for surgical clipping and $103,000 (IQR $72,900–$159,000) for endovascular coiling. When the authors adjusted for unmeasured confounders by using an instrumental variable analysis, clipping was associated with increased 1-year Medicare expenditures by $19,577 (95% CI $4492–$34,663). CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of Medicare patients with aneurysmal SAH, after controlling for unmeasured confounding, surgical clipping was associated with increased 1-year expenditures in comparison with endovascular coiling.


2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 811-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimon Bekelis ◽  
Daniel J. Gottlieb ◽  
Yin Su ◽  
A. James O'Malley ◽  
Nicos Labropoulos ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE The comparative effectiveness of the 2 treatment options—surgical clipping and endovascular coiling—for unruptured cerebral aneurysms remains an issue of debate and has not been studied in clinical trials. The authors investigated the association between treatment method for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and outcomes in elderly patients. METHODS The authors performed a cohort study of 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims data for elderly patients who had treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms between 2007 and 2012. To control for measured confounding, the authors used propensity score conditioning and inverse probability weighting with mixed effects to account for clustering at the level of the hospital referral region (HRR). An instrumental variable (regional rates of coiling) analysis was used to control for unmeasured confounding and to create pseudo-randomization on the treatment method. RESULTS During the study period, 8705 patients underwent treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and met the study inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 2585 (29.7%) had surgical clipping and 6120 (70.3%) had endovascular coiling. Instrumental variable analysis demonstrated no difference between coiling and clipping in 1-year postoperative mortality (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.68–2.31) or 90-day readmission rate (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.66–1.62). However, clipping was associated with a greater likelihood of discharge to rehabilitation (OR 6.39, 95% CI 3.85–10.59) and 3.6 days longer length of stay (LOS; 95% CI 2.90–4.71). The same associations were present in propensity score–adjusted and inverse probability–weighted models. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of Medicare patients, there was no difference in mortality and the readmission rate between clipping and coiling of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Clipping was associated with a higher rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility and a longer LOS.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 913-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimon Bekelis ◽  
Dan Gottlieb ◽  
Yin Su ◽  
Alistair J O'Malley ◽  
Nicos Labropoulos ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe comparative effectiveness of the two treatment options (surgical clipping and endovascular coiling) for ruptured cerebral aneurysms has not been studied in real-world practice in the USA. We investigated the association between the treatment method for ruptured cerebral aneurysms and outcomes.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of elderly patients who underwent treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysms from 2007 to 2012 using a 100% sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims data. An instrumental variable analysis was used to control for unmeasured confounding and to create pseudo-randomization on the treatment method. In sensitivity analysis, controlling only for measured confounding, we used propensity score conditioning and inverse probability weighting with mixed effects to account for clustering at the Hospital Referral Region (HRR) level.ResultsDuring the study period 3210 patients underwent treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysms and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1206 (37.6%) had surgical clipping and 2004 (62.4%) had endovascular coiling. Instrumental variable analysis demonstrated no difference between coiling and clipping in 1-year postoperative mortality (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.54), likelihood of discharge to rehabilitation (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.58), or 30-day readmission rate (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.87). However, clipping was associated with 2.7 days longer length of stay (LOS) (95% CI 0.45 to 4.99). The same associations were present in propensity score adjusted and inverse probability weighted models.ConclusionsIn a cohort of Medicare patients, we did not demonstrate a difference in mortality, rate of discharge to rehabilitation, and readmissions between clipping and coiling of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Clipping was associated with a slightly longer LOS.


Author(s):  
Hamidreza Saber ◽  
Naoki Kaneko ◽  
David Kimball ◽  
Jose Morales ◽  
Satoshi Tateshima ◽  
...  

Introduction : Age is an important determinant of outcome in patients with unruptured or ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Advancements in endovascular therapies have significantly impacted patient selection and treatment of patients with cerebral aneurysm. Recent release of the National claims data for 2017–2018 provides the opportunity to explore novel population‐level outcomes following clipping vs endovascular treatment of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms in different age groups. Methods : Analysis of US National Inpatient Sample of hospitalizations with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) or unruptured aneurysms treated with clipping or endovascular therapy from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018. Pre‐defined age strata included: younger than 50 years; 50–64 years; 65–79 years; and 80 years or older. Primary outcomes included in‐hospital mortality and favorable outcome defined as discharge to home. Results : Overall, 34,955 hospitalizations with unruptured aneurysm treatment, (26,695 endovascular and 8,260 surgical clipping), and 17,525 hospitalizations with aSAH were identified in the study period. In unruptured aneurysm group, endovascular therapy was associated with significantly higher favorable outcome across all age groups, and lower mortality in those 65 years or older (all P<0.001) when compared to clipping. Median hospital length‐of‐stay was 1 day (IQR 1–4) in endovascular vs 4 days (IQR 3–8) in clipping group (P<0.001). In aSAH group, endovascular therapy was associated with higher favorable outcome in 50–80 years age groups when compared to clipping, with no significant differences for in‐hospital mortality outcome (Table). Significantly more favorable outcomes were achieved with coiling vs clipping in those aged 65 or above with unruptured aneurysms. Conclusions : In 2017–2018 in US, unruptured aneurysm patients treated with endovascular therapy had significantly lower morbidity and mortality compared to those treated with surgical clipping, and differences were more pronounced with age. Similar but less strong association was observed in patients with aSAH.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Yoon Kim ◽  
Jung Cheol Park ◽  
Jae Kyun Kim ◽  
Yu Sub Sung ◽  
Eun Suk Park ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A15.1-A15
Author(s):  
M Piotin ◽  
B Bartolini ◽  
H Redjem ◽  
S Pistocchi ◽  
R Blanc

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimon Bekelis ◽  
Dan Gottlieb ◽  
Nicos Labropoulos ◽  
Yin Su ◽  
Stavropoula Tjoumakaris ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE The impact of combined practices on the outcomes of unruptured cerebral aneurysm coiling remains an issue of debate. The authors investigated the association of combined open and endovascular expertise with the outcomes of unruptured cerebral aneurysm coiling. METHODS The authors performed a cohort study of 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims data for elderly patients who underwent endovascular coiling for unruptured cerebral aneurysms between 2007 and 2012. To control for confounding, the authors used propensity score conditioning, with mixed effects to account for clustering at the hospital referral region level. RESULTS During the study period, there were 11,716 patients who underwent endovascular coiling for unruptured cerebral aneurysms and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1186 (10.1%) underwent treatment performed by hybrid neurosurgeons, and 10,530 (89.9%) by proceduralists who performed only endovascular coiling. Multivariable regression analysis with propensity score adjustment demonstrated a lack of association of combined practice with 1-year postoperative mortality (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.58–1.23), discharge to rehabilitation (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.66–1.51), 30-day readmission rate (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.83–1.38), and length of stay (adjusted difference, 0.41; 95% CI −0.26 to 1.09). Higher procedural volume was independently associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of Medicare patients, the authors did not demonstrate a difference in mortality, discharge to rehabilitation, readmission rate, and LOS between hybrid neurosurgeons and proceduralists performing only endovascular coiling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document