JET 7 XTRA Flex reperfusion catheter related complications during endovascular thrombectomy

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016826
Author(s):  
Shahram Majidi ◽  
Devin V Bageac ◽  
Islam Fayed ◽  
Benjamin Yim ◽  
Reade De Leacy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Technological Advancement ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Device Malfunction ◽  
Inner Diameter

Endovascular thrombectomy has revolutionized the management of acute ischemic stroke from emergent large vessel occlusion. Continued technological advancement in the field, as evidenced by successive introduction of large bore aspiration catheters with enhanced trackability and large inner diameter, has played a major role in achieving fast and robust recanalization and improved clinical outcome. Here, we present three patients with intraprocedural device malfunction related to the JET 7 XTRA Flex reperfusion catheter.

Differences in Acute Ischemic Stroke Management and Prognosis between Multiple Large-Vessel Occlusion and Single Large-Vessel Occlusion: Subanalysis of the RESCUE-Japan Registry 2

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-404
Author(s):  
Kotaro Tatebayashi ◽  
Kazutaka Uchida ◽  
Hiroto Kageyama ◽  
Hirotoshi Imamura ◽  
Nobuyuki Ohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Tandem Occlusion ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Patient Prognosis

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The management and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke due to multiple large-vessel occlusion (LVO) (MLVO) are not well scrutinized. We therefore aimed to elucidate the differences in patient characteristics and prognosis of MLVO and single LVO (SLVO). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2 (RESCUE-Japan Registry 2) enrolled 2,420 consecutive patients with acute LVO who were admitted within 24 h of onset. We compared patient prognosis between MLVO and SLVO in the favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2, and in mortality at 90 days by adjusting for confounders. Additionally, we stratified MLVO patients into tandem occlusion and different territories, according to the occlusion site information and also examined their characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among the 2,399 patients registered, 124 (5.2%) had MLVO. Although there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of hypertension as a risk factor, the mean arterial pressure on admission was significantly higher in MLVO (115 vs. 107 mm Hg, <i>p</i> = 0.004). MLVO in different territories was more likely to be cardioembolic (42.1 vs. 10.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), while MLVO in tandem occlusion was more likely to be atherothrombotic (39.5 vs. 81.3%, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Among MLVO, tandem occlusion had a significantly longer onset-to-door time than different territories (200 vs. 95 min, <i>p</i> = 0.02); accordingly, the tissue plasminogen activator administration was significantly less in tandem occlusion (22.4 vs. 47.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). However, interestingly, the endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was performed significantly more in tandem occlusion (63.2 vs. 41.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.0). The type of MLVO was the only and significant factor associated with EVT performance in multivariate analysis. The favorable outcomes were obtained less in MLVO than in SLVO (28.2 vs. 37.1%; aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30–0.76). The mortality rate was not significantly different between MLVO and SLVO (8.9 vs. 11.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.42). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> The prognosis of MLVO was significantly worse than that of SLVO. In different territories, we might be able to consider more aggressive EVT interventions.

scholarly journals Repeated Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 526-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
France Anne Victoire Pirson ◽  
Robert J. van Oostenbrugge ◽  
Wim H. van Zwam ◽  
Michel J.M. Remmers ◽  
Diederik W.J. Dippel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Repeated Treatment ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Mr Clean

Background and Purpose— Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy may be treated with repeat endovascular thrombectomy (rEVT) in case of recurrent large vessel occlusion. Data on safety and efficacy of these interventions is scarce. Our aim is to report on frequency, timing, and outcome of rEVT in a large nation-wide multicenter registry. Methods— In the Netherlands, all patients with endovascular thrombectomy have been registered since 2002 (MR CLEAN Pretrial registry, MR CLEAN Trial [Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands], and MR CLEAN Registry). We retrospectively reviewed these databases for anterior circulation rEVT cases. Patient characteristics, procedural data, and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale at 90 days) were analyzed. Results— Of 3928 patients treated between 2002 and 2017, 27 (0.7%) underwent rEVT. Median time between first and second procedure was 78 (1–1122) days; 11/27 patients were re-treated within 30 days. Cardioembolism was the most common etiology (18 patients [67%]). In 19 patients (70%), recurrent occlusion occurred ipsilateral to previous occlusion. At 90 days after rEVT procedure, 44% of the patients had achieved functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2), and 33% had died. Adverse events were 2/27 (7.4%) intracranial hemorrhage, 1/27 (3.7%) stroke progression, and 1/27 (3.7%) pneumonia. Conclusions— In this large nationwide cohort of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy, rEVT was rare. Stroke cause was mainly cardio-embolic, and most recurrent large vessel occlusions in which rEVT was performed occurred ipsilateral. Although there probably is a selection bias on repeated treatment in case of recurrent large vessel occlusion, rEVT appears safe, with similar outcome as in single-treated cases.

White Matter Hyperintensity Burden and Collateral Circulation in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imad Derraz ◽  
Mohamed Abdelrady ◽  
Nicolas Gaillard ◽  
Raed Ahmed ◽  
Federico Cagnazzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Collateral Circulation ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
White Matter Hyperintensity ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy

Background and Purpose: White matter hyperintensity (WMH), a marker of chronic cerebral small vessel disease, might impact the recruitment of leptomeningeal collaterals. We aimed to assess whether the WMH burden is associated with collateral circulation in patients treated by endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Consecutive acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and treated with endovascular thrombectomy from January 2015 to December 2017 were included. WMH volumes (periventricular, deep, and total) were assessed by a semiautomated volumetric analysis on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery–magnetic resonance imaging. Collateral status was graded on baseline catheter angiography using the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology grading system (good when ≥3). We investigated associations of WMH burden with collateral status. Results: A total of 302 patients were included (mean age, 69.1±19.4 years; women, 55.6%). Poor collaterals were observed in 49.3% of patients. Median total WMH volume was 3.76 cm 3 (interquartile range, 1.09–11.81 cm 3 ). The regression analyses showed no apparent relationship between WMH burden and the collateral status measured at baseline angiography (adjusted odds ratio, 0.987 [95% CI, 0.971–1.003]; P =0.12). Conclusions: WMH burden exhibits no overt association with collaterals in large vessel occlusive stroke.

scholarly journals Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Vessel Occlusion: Where We Are and What Comes Next?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shafie ◽  
Wengui Yu
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Past ◽  
Tissue Plasminogen

AbstractIn the past 5 years, the success of multiple randomized controlled trials of recanalization therapy with endovascular thrombectomy has transformed the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. The evidence from these trials has now established endovascular thrombectomy as standard of care. This review will discuss the chronological evolution of large vessel occlusion treatment from early medical therapy with tissue plasminogen activator to the latest mechanical thrombectomy. Additionally, it will highlight the potential areas in endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke open to exploration and further progress in the next decade.

Endovascular versus medical therapy for large-vessel anterior occlusive stroke presenting with mild symptoms

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan N Wolman ◽  
David G Marcellus ◽  
Maarten G Lansberg ◽  
Gregory Albers ◽  
Adrien Guenego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background Acute ischemic stroke patients with a large-vessel occlusion but mild symptoms (NIHSS ≤ 6) pose a treatment dilemma between medical management and endovascular thrombectomy. Aims To evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy-eligible patients with target-mismatch perfusion profiles who undergo either medical management or endovascular thrombectomy. Methods Forty-seven patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion, NIHSS ≤ 6, and a target-mismatch perfusion imaging profile were included. Patients underwent medical management or endovascular thrombectomy following treating neurointerventionalist and neurologist consensus. The primary outcome measure was NIHSS shift. Secondary outcome measures were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mRS scores. The primary intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses were compared to determine the impact of crossover patient allocation on study outcome measures. Results Forty-seven patients were included. Thirty underwent medical management (64%) and 17 underwent endovascular thrombectomy (36%). Three medical management patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy due to early clinical deterioration. Presentation NIHSS ( P = 0.82), NIHSS shift ( P = 0.62), and 90-day functional independence (mRS 0–2; P = 0.25) were similar between groups. Endovascular thrombectomy patients demonstrated an increased overall rate of intracranial hemorrhage (35.3% vs. 10.0%; P = 0.04), but symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar between groups ( P = 0.25). In-hospital mortality was similar between groups ( P = 0.46), though all two deaths in the medical management group occurred among crossover patients. Endovascular thrombectomy patients demonstrated a longer length of stay (7.6 ± 7.2 vs. 4.3 ± 3.9 days; P = 0.04) and a higher frequency of unfavorable discharge to a skilled-nursing facility ( P = 0.03) rather than home ( P = 0.05). Conclusions Endovascular thrombectomy may pose an unfavorable risk-benefit profile over medical management for endovascular thrombectomy-eligible acute ischemic stroke patients with mild symptoms, which warrants a randomized trial in this subpopulation.

Abstract WP85: Clinical and Imaging Predictors, and Functional Outcomes, of Fast, Intermediate, and Slow Progression Among Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo-Keun Seo ◽  
David S Liebeskind ◽  
Bryan Yoo ◽  
Latisha Sharma ◽  
Reza Jahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Determinant ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽  
Artery Disease

Background: Speed of infarct progression varies widely in acute ischemic stroke and is a major determinant of outcome. Patient demographic, clinical, and imaging features associated with slow, intermediate, and rapid infarct growth have not been well delineated. Methods: In a prospectively maintained stroke center registry, we analyzed consecutive patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent first multimodal MRI or CT imaging within 24 hours of onset. The speed of initial infarct progression was calculated as ischemic core volume at first imaging divided by the time from stroke onset to imaging. Results: Among the 88 patients, age was mean 71.6 ± 15.0; 51% were women; initial NIHSS was 16.1 ± 6.5), and time from onset to first imaging was median 3.3h (full range 0.6 - 23.0). The speed of infarct progression was median 2.2 cc/hr (interquartile range 0 - 8.7), ranging most widely among patients imaged within the first 6 hours after onset. Faster speed of infarct progression was positively independently associated with low collateral score (OR 3.30, 95%CI 1.25 - 10.49) and arrival by emergency medical services rather than transfer (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.06 - 10.49) and negatively independently associated with prior ischemic stroke (OR 0.12, 95%CI 0.03 - 0.50) and coronary artery disease (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.10 - 1.00). Among the 67 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy, slower speeds of infarct progression were associated with shift to reduced levels of disability at discharge (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.02 - 10.45). In addition, slower speed of infarct progression was associated with favorable shift to recanalization by thrombectomy (OR 8.30, 95%CI 0.97 - 70-.87) and reduced radiologic hemorrhagic transformation (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12 - 0.94). Conclusion: Slower speed of initial infarct progression is associated with high collateral score, prior ischemic stroke, and coronary artery disease, supporting roles for both collateral robustness and ischemic precondition in fostering tissue resilience to ischemia. Among patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, speed of initial infarct progression is a major determinant of clinical outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document