scholarly journals Clinical measures, smoking, radon exposure, and risk of lung cancer in uranium miners.

1996 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 697-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
M M Finkelstein
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Aßenmacher ◽  
Jan Christian Kaiser ◽  
Ignacio Zaballa ◽  
Antonio Gasparrini ◽  
Helmut Küchenhoff

The Lancet ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 341 (8850) ◽  
pp. 919-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Tomášek ◽  
E Kunz ◽  
S.C Darby ◽  
A.J Swerdlow ◽  
V Placek

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Laurier ◽  
Maria Schnelzer ◽  
Ladislav Tomasek ◽  
Estelle Rage ◽  
Michaela Kreuzer ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 368-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tirmarche ◽  
J. Harrison ◽  
D. Laurier ◽  
E. Blanchardon ◽  
F. Paquet ◽  
...  

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recently estimated the risk of lung cancer associated with radon exposure, and a statement was issued in ICRP Publication 115. This was based on recent epidemiological studies and the results from a joint analysis of cohorts of Czech, French, and German uranium miners, and indicated that the excess relative risk of lung cancer per unit of exposure should be expressed with consideration of chronic exposure over more than 10 years, by modelling time since median exposure, age attained or age at exposure, and taking in account, if possible, interaction between radon and tobacco. The lifetime excess absolute risk (LEAR) calculated from occupational exposure studies is close to 5 × 10−4 per working level month (WLM) (14 × 10−5 per hm J/m3). LEAR values estimated using risk models derived from both miners and domestic exposure studies are in good agreement after accounting for factors such as sex, attained age, and exposure scenario. A sensitivity analysis highlighted the high dependence of background mortality rates on LEAR estimates. Using lung cancer rates among Euro-American males instead of the ICRP reference rates (males and females, and Euro-American and Asian populations), the estimated LEAR is close to 7 × 10−4 per WLM (20 × 10−5 per hm J/m3).


2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (9) ◽  
pp. 1367-1369 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kreuzer ◽  
N Fenske ◽  
M Schnelzer ◽  
L Walsh

Author(s):  
Jing Chen

Abstract Epidemiological evidence of lung cancer risk from radon is based mainly on studies of underground miners where occupational exposures were, historically, relatively high in comparison to residential indoor exposure. However, radiation protection measures have caused radon levels in uranium mines to decrease significantly in more recent periods. Miners’ occupational exposure is limited to their working years while they are exposed to environmental radon at home over their entire lifetime. Even during their limited working years, workers spend much more time at home than in workplaces. The biological effect of radon in mines cannot be distinguished from the biological effect of residential radon. Therefore, for an exposure–risk relationship study of former uranium miners, excess radon-induced lung cancer cases should be related to the combined radon exposure cumulated in workplaces and at homes in excess of the radon exposure of the reference population. This is especially important when residential radon levels differ or vary significantly between miners and the reference population over the course of extended follow-up years. This paper reviews some recent studies on former uranium miners, shares what seems controversial to the author and wonders whether lifetime exposure at home to widely varying radon concentrations can actually impact the quality of exposure assessment, and hence impact the results of the exposure–risk relationship.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Richardson ◽  
Estelle Rage ◽  
Paul A. Demers ◽  
Minh Do ◽  
Nora Fenske ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document