scholarly journals 295 Ergonomic exposure assessed by production statistics

2013 ◽  
Vol 70 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A100.3-A101
Author(s):  
C B Brauer ◽  
Bern ◽  
Alkjaer ◽  
Bonde ◽  
Helweg-Larsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2022 ◽  
pp. oemed-2021-107899
Author(s):  
Gabriela Schmajuk ◽  
Laura Trupin ◽  
Edward H Yelin ◽  
Paul D Blanc

ObjectivesWe previously showed increased coal mining-associated risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Using additional survey data, we sought to delineate this risk further.MethodsWe used data from two cross-sectional, random-digit-dial, population-based surveys (males;≥50 years) in selected counties in the Appalachian region of the inland, mid-Atlantic USA with elevated pneumoconiosis mortality. Surveys ascertained age, smoking, coal mining and non-coal silica exposure jobs. In a subset, we surveyed ergonomic exposures, scored by intensity. We queried diagnosis of RA, corticosteroid use, and, in a subset, use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Multivariable logistic regression modelled RA risk (defined by glucocorticoid or DMARDs use) associated with coal mining employment, other silica exposure, smoking status, and age and ergonomic exposures.ResultsWe analysed data for 2981 survey respondents (mean age 66.6 years; 15% current, 44% ex-smokers). The prevalence of glucocorticoid-treated and DMARD-treated RA was 11% and 4%, respectively. Glucocorticoid-treated RA was associated with coal mining (OR 3.5; 95% CI 2.5 to 4.9) and non-coal mining silica exposure (OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.4 to 4.4). For DMARD-treated RA, the odds associated with coal mining and other silica remained elevated: OR 2.3 (95% CI 1.18, 4.5) and OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.51, 5.0), respectively. In the same model, the highest intensity ergonomic exposure also was associated with increased odds of RA (OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.96 to 9.6).ConclusionsWe observed a strong association between coal mining and other silica-exposing dusty trades and RA. Clinicians and insurers should consider occupational histories in the aetiology of RA.


2000 ◽  
Vol 44 (30) ◽  
pp. 5-600-5-600
Author(s):  
Jung-Soon Park ◽  
Laura Punnett

This study was conducted to examine the relationship of ergonomic exposure to medical visits for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) at the job level. Ergonomic exposure index score was constructed at the job level based on individual workers' psychophysical ratings of multiple ergonomic exposures (1992) and medical visit rates (1989–1993) were calculated. A positive association was found between the two. As well as physical ergonomic exposure, level of psychosocial job control seemed to play an important role, possibly due to its determination of workers' accessibility to the medical department.


Author(s):  
Busisiwe Shezi ◽  
Renee A. Street ◽  
Angela Mathee ◽  
Nokulunga Cele ◽  
Sipho Ndabandaba ◽  
...  

The work conducted in the informal sector is highly variable within and between days. Characterizing ergonomic exposures remains a challenge because of unstructured work settings and schedules. The existing ergonomic risk assessment tools have been widely used in formal work settings with a narrow range of exposure, and for predefined tasks that primarily constitute a daily routine. There is limited information in the literature on how they have been applied in informal workplaces. The aim of this study was to extend an existing risk assessment tool and to evaluate the applicability of the extended tool by assessing ergonomic exposure related to hand-made cookware operations. Eighteen hand-made cookware makers were recruited from six sites. A walkthrough risk assessment questionnaire was used to collect information on workers, tasks, work stations and workplace structures. The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) screening tool was extended by including duration and vibration. An action priority matrix was used to guide intervention. According to the RULA action levels, the workers required investigation and changes soon, and immediate investigation and changes. The use of an action priority matrix was appropriate, and indicated that all the workers assessed were within the high to very high exposure domain and required immediate corrective measures. The methodology used proved to be an effective and reliable strategy for identifying ergonomic exposure among hand-made cookware makers.


Author(s):  
Christopher S. Pan ◽  
Lytt I. Gardner ◽  
Douglas P. Landsittel ◽  
Scott A. Hendricks ◽  
Sharon S. Chiou ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jungkeun Park ◽  
Jon Boyer ◽  
Jamie Tessler ◽  
Gustavo Perez ◽  
Laura Punnett

We examined the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of expert observations of ergonomic risk factors by four analysts. Ten jobs were observed at a hospital using a revision of the PATH method (Buchholz 1996). Two of four raters simultaneously observed each worker onsite. A total of 18 categorical exposure items were available for analysis. For most of the items, kappa coefficients were 0.4 or higher, showing that the IRR of the revised method was good. As predicted, agreement among observers was higher for the jobs with less rapid hand activity and for the analysts with more ergonomics and job analysis experience. The results show that the revised method can be reliably applicable to hospital work, and suggest that it can reasonably assess ergonomic exposure in any type of non-routine job across industries including healthcare industry.


2019 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 102874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Schwartz ◽  
Susan G. Gerberich ◽  
Hyun Kim ◽  
Andrew D. Ryan ◽  
Timothy R. Church ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document