Time to talk? Patient experiences of waiting for clinical management of knee injuries

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Robling ◽  
R M Pill ◽  
K Hood ◽  
C C Butler
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. e149
Author(s):  
Elizabeth H.G. Turner ◽  
Craig C. Akoh ◽  
Scott J. Hetzel ◽  
B. Keegan Markhardt ◽  
Andrea M. Spiker

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Matheson ◽  
Philip Asherson ◽  
Ian Chi Kei Wong ◽  
Paul Hodgkins ◽  
Juliana Setyawan ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol W. Lawrence

Speech-language evaluation reports from many institutions present age-equivalent scores as the evidence for speech-language deficits. Yet, the value and interpretation of this measurement criterion requires clinical scrutiny. This article reviews the concept and derivation of age-equivalent scores and presents arguments against their use in case management decisions.


1988 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Pollock ◽  
Richard G. Schwartz

The relationship between syllabic structure and segmental development was examined longitudinally in a child with a severe phonological disorder. Six speech samples were collected over a 4-year period (3:5 to 7:3). Analyses revealed gradual increases in the complexity and diversity of the syllable structures produced, and positional preferences for sounds within these forms. With a strong preference for [d] and [n] at the beginning of syllables, other consonants appeared first at the end of syllables. Implications for clinical management of phonological disorders include the need to consider both structural position and structural complexity in assessing segmental skills and in choosing target words for intervention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3S) ◽  
pp. 631-637
Author(s):  
Katja Lund ◽  
Rodrigo Ordoñez ◽  
Jens Bo Nielsen ◽  
Dorte Hammershøi

Purpose The aim of this study was to develop a tool to gain insight into the daily experiences of new hearing aid users and to shed light on aspects of aided performance that may not be unveiled through standard questionnaires. Method The tool is developed based on clinical observations, patient experiences, expert involvement, and existing validated hearing rehabilitation questionnaires. Results An online tool for collecting data related to hearing aid use was developed. The tool is based on 453 prefabricated sentences representing experiences within 13 categories related to hearing aid use. Conclusions The tool has the potential to reflect a wide range of individual experiences with hearing aid use, including auditory and nonauditory aspects. These experiences may hold important knowledge for both the patient and the professional in the hearing rehabilitation process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document