Stroke recovery and rehabilitation in 2016: a year in review of basic science and clinical science

Haiqing Zheng; Ning Cao; Yu Yin; Wuwei Feng

doi:10.1136/svn-2017-000069

Stroke recovery and rehabilitation in 2016: a year in review of basic science and clinical science

Stroke and Vascular Neurology ◽

10.1136/svn-2017-000069 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2 (4) ◽

pp. 222-229 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Haiqing Zheng ◽

Ning Cao ◽

Yu Yin ◽

Wuwei Feng

Keyword(s):

Basic Science ◽

Clinical Science ◽

Stroke Recovery

Download Full-text

Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce

International Journal of Stroke ◽

10.1177/1747493017711816 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 12 (5) ◽

pp. 444-450 ◽

Cited By ~ 156

Author(s):

Julie Bernhardt ◽

Kathryn S Hayward ◽

Gert Kwakkel ◽

Nick S Ward ◽

Steven L Wolf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Basic Science ◽

Intervention Development ◽

Shared Vision ◽

Stroke Recovery ◽

Common Language ◽

Agreed Framework ◽

Working Groups

The first Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable established a game changing set of new standards for stroke recovery research. Common language and definitions were required to develop an agreed framework spanning the four working groups: translation of basic science, biomarkers of stroke recovery, measurement in clinical trials and intervention development and reporting. This paper outlines the working definitions established by our group and an agreed vision for accelerating progress in stroke recovery research.

Download Full-text

Perception of BDS students of Kathmandu University on online learning during COVID-19 pandemic

Orthodontic Journal of Nepal ◽

10.3126/ojn.v10i2.31064 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (2) ◽

pp. 20-28

Author(s):

Alka Gupta ◽

Rabindra Man Shrestha ◽

Sujita Shrestha ◽

Asal Acharya ◽

Nashib Pandey

Keyword(s):

Online Education ◽

Basic Science ◽

Clinical Science ◽

Online Classes ◽

Science Students ◽

Chi Square ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Dental Surgery ◽

Online Class ◽

The Difference

Introduction: The spread of COVID-19 pandemic has gripped the entire world and caused widespread public health concerns, hampered economics and education system immensely. Online classes have been an alternative to give continuity to the theory classes. The objective of this study is to assess the various aspects of online classes and perception of Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students of Kathmandu University (KU) during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Method: Cross-sectional, questionnaire based descriptive study using online Google form was distributed among the BDS students of KU. The questionnaire was distributed via social media. Frequency distribution of the descriptive data was done. Chi-square test was done to assess the difference in perception about online classes between the basic science and clinical science students. Result: 89% of the students had never attended any online classes before online education due to COVID-19 pandemic. 76.9% agreed that the online class is distracting. 57.5% used smartphone for seeking online class and medium most frequently used was Zoom platform. 70.2% students could ask questions, communicate & receive response during online class. 55.4% students disagreed that online classes are more effective. Statistical significant differences were seen in students submitting assignments, communication and practical simulation among basic science and clinical science students. Conclusion: Online class can serve as an alternative effective educational tool. With more practice, system upgrading, capacity building of the student-teacher; it is bound to be more effective as well as efficient. The online class should be designed in such a way that student can focus and find it more interesting and should introduce various strategies to increase the interaction between students and teachers. Further, training on online class is required for both course recipients and providers.

Download Full-text