scholarly journals Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial of omeprazole in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Thorax ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prosenjit Dutta ◽  
Wendy Funston ◽  
Helen Mossop ◽  
Vicky Ryan ◽  
Rhys Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Acid Reflux ◽  
Forced Expiratory Volume ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cough Frequency ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundCough is a common, disabling symptom of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which may be exacerbated by acid reflux. Inhibiting gastric acid secretion could potentially reduce cough. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a larger, multicentre trial of omeprazole for cough in IPF, to assess safety and to quantify cough.MethodsSingle-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole (20 mg twice daily for 3 months) in patients with IPF. Primary objectives were to assess feasibility and acceptability of trial procedures. The primary clinical outcome was cough frequency.ResultsForty-five participants were randomised (23 to omeprazole, 22 to placebo), with 40 (20 in each group) having cough monitoring before and after treatment. 280 patients were screened to yield these numbers, with barriers to discontinuing antacids the single biggest reason for non-recruitment. Recruitment averaged 1.5 participants per month. Geometric mean cough frequency at the end of treatment, adjusted for baseline, was 39.1% lower (95% CI 66.0% lower to 9.3% higher) in the omeprazole group compared with placebo. Omeprazole was well tolerated and adverse event profiles were similar in both groups, although there was a small excess of lower respiratory tract infection and a small fall in forced expiratory volume and forced vital capacity associated with omeprazole.ConclusionsA large randomised controlled trial of PPIs for cough in IPF appears feasible and justified but should address barriers to randomisation and incorporate safety assessments in relation to respiratory infection and changes in lung function.

scholarly journals FDA-approved Antitussive Dextromethorphan Enhances Antifibrotic Effectiveness of Pirfenidone in Bleomycin-induced Mice and Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nana Liu ◽  
Yubao Wang ◽  
Jie Huang ◽  
Yunze Du ◽  
Luqing Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Model Study ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background: We aimed to investigate whether dextromethorphan (DM), an antitussive agent, could improve the antifibrotic efficacy of pirfenidone in treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a fatal interstitial lung disease characterized by progressive and irreversible respiratory failure.Methods: A bleomycin-induced mouse pulmonary fibrosis model study and an open-label randomized clinical trial were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of pirfenidone combined with DM.Results: In the animal study, pirfenidone combined with DM protected the mice against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis with better capabilities than pirfenidone or DM alone, as indicated by lung histologic analysis and hydroxyproline levels. In the clinical study, pirfenidone plus DM markedly mitigated pulmonary function (FEV1 and FVC) decline and ameliorated chest HRCT imaging scores (ground glass opacities and reticulation) of patients with IPF compared with pirfenidone alone at one year after administration. There were no significant differences in adverse reactions between the pirfenidone-DM group and the pirfenidone group.Conclusions: Pirfenidone plus DM may be a better strategy to modify IPF than pirfenidone alone. The efficacy and safety of the combination of pirfenidone and DM for patients with IPF warrants further verification by a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT).

scholarly journals A feasibility, randomised controlled trial of a complex breathlessness intervention in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (BREEZE-IPF): study protocol

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 00186-2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Wright ◽  
Simon P. Hart ◽  
Victoria Allgar ◽  
Anne English ◽  
Flavia Swan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive lung disease that causes breathlessness and cough that worsen over time, limiting daily activities and negatively impacting quality of life. Although treatments are now available that slow the rate of lung function decline, trials of these treatments have failed to show improvement in symptoms or quality of life. There is an immediate unmet need for evidenced-based interventions that improve patients' symptom burden and make a difference to everyday living. This study aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial of a holistic, complex breathlessness intervention in people with IPF.Methods and analysisThe trial is a two-centre, randomised controlled feasibility trial of a complex breathlessness intervention compared with usual care in patients with IPF. 50 participants will be recruited from secondary care IPF clinics and randomised 1:1 to either start the intervention within 1 week of randomisation (fast-track group) or to receive usual care for 8 weeks before receiving the intervention (wait-list group). Participants will remain in the study for a total of 16 weeks. Outcome measures will be feasibility outcomes, including recruitment, retention, acceptability and fidelity of the intervention. Clinical outcomes will be measured to inform outcome selection and sample size calculation for a definitive trial.Ethics and disseminationYorkshire and The Humber – Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (REC 18/YH/0147). Results of the main trial and all secondary end-points will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document