Effects of large woody debris placement on stream channels and benthic macroinvertebrates

1997 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 931-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Hilderbrand ◽  
A D Lemly ◽  
C A Dolloff ◽  
K L Harpster

Large woody debris (LWD) was added as an experimental stream restoration technique in two streams in southwest Virginia. Additions were designed to compare human judgement in log placements against a randomized design and an unmanipulated reach, and also to compare effectiveness in a low- and a high-gradient stream. Pool area increased 146% in the systematic placement and 32% in the random placement sections of the low-gradient stream, lending support to the notion that human judgement can be more effective than placing logs at random in low-gradient streams. Conversely, the high-gradient stream changed very little after LWD additions, suggesting that other hydraulic controls such as boulders and bedrock override LWD influences in high-gradient streams. Logs oriented as dams were responsible for all pools created by additions regardless of stream or method of placement. Multiple log combinations created only two pools, while the other seven pools were created by single LWD pieces. Total benthic macroinvertebrate abundance did not change as a result of LWD additions in either stream, but net abundances of Plecoptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera, and Oligochaeta decreased, while Ephemeroptera increased significantly with the proportional increase in pool area in the low-gradient stream.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1477-1487 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Lassettre ◽  
G. M. Kondolf


2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Roni ◽  
Thomas P Quinn

Thirty streams in western Oregon and Washington were sampled to determine the responses of juvenile salmonid populations to artificial large woody debris (LWD) placement. Total pool area, pool number, LWD loading, and LWD forming pools were higher in treatment (LWD placement) than paired reference reaches during summer or winter. Juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) densities were 1.8 and 3.2 times higher in treated reaches compared with reference reaches during summer and winter, respectively. The response (treatment minus reference) of coho density to LWD placement was correlated with the number of pieces of LWD forming pools during summer and total pool area during winter. Densities of age-1+ cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) and steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) did not differ between treatment and reference reaches during summer but were 1.7 times higher in treatment reaches during winter. Age-1+ steelhead density response to treatment during summer was negatively correlated with increases in pool area. Trout fry densities did not differ between reaches, but the response of trout fry to treatment was negatively correlated with pool area during winter. Our research indicates that LWD placement can lead to higher densities of juvenile coho during summer and winter and cutthroat and steelhead during winter.



1994 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Ralph ◽  
Geoffrey C. Poole ◽  
Loveday L. Conquest ◽  
Robert J. Naiman

Channel morphology and habitat characteristics of stream segments draining unharvested old-growth forests were compared with those from streams within intensively and moderately logged basins. Sites covered a broad geographic range in western Washington State and were stratified by basin area and channel gradient. Although the number of pieces of large woody debris (LWD) within stream channels was unaffected by timber harvest, there was a clear reduction in LWD size in harvested basins. Timber harvest also resulted in a shift in location of LWD towards the channel margins, outside the low-flow wetted width of the channel. Intensive harvest simplified channel habitat by increasing riffle area and reducing pool area and depth, although the commonly used index of pool-to-riffle ratio appears inadequate to document these changes. Given the natural variation from stream to stream, we conclude that simple counts of instream LWD and channel units (habitat types) are not useful as management objectives. Instead, these attributes should be used collectively as indicators of the complexity and stability of in-stream habitat with respect to the specific channel and valley geomorphology.







2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 750-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Rossetti de Paula ◽  
Silvio Frosini de Barros Ferraz ◽  
Pedro Gerhard ◽  
Carlos Alberto Vettorazzi ◽  
Anderson Ferreira




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document