Pylons of cable-stayed bridges: a comparison

1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fakhry Aboul-Ella
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Static Analysis ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Soil Mechanics ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Cable Stayed Bridge ◽  
Fixed Base ◽  
Cable Stayed Bridges

A new analytical model for the static analysis of cable-stayed bridges is presented taking into consideration the effect of soil–structure interaction. Bridges having pylons and piers of different degrees of restraint, such as fixed or hinged base pylons, fixed base piers, and pile-supported piers, are analyzed and compared to investigate the effect of these restraints on the response of the entire cable-stayed bridge system. The validity of the assumption of fixed support for pylons or piers is also examined. Key words: bridges, cables, foundation, towers, pylons, piers, piles, caissons, soil mechanics.

Effect of Pile-Soil-Structure Interaction on the Cable-Stayed Bridge in Response to the Earthquake

2014 ◽  
Vol 539 ◽  
pp. 731-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Chen
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Finite Element Software ◽  
Cable Stayed Bridge ◽  
Three Dimensional Finite Element

In this thesis, based on the design of a 140+90m span unusual single tower and single cable plane cable-stayed bridge, free vibration characteristics and seismic response are investigated; three dimensional finite element models of a single tower cable-stayed bridge with and without the pile-soil-structure interaction are established respectively by utilizing finite element software MIDAS/CIVIL, seismic response of Response spectrum and Earthquake schedule are analyzed respectively and compared. By the comparison of the data analysis, for small stiffness span cable-stayed bridge, the pile-soil-structure interaction can not be ignored with calculation and analysis of seismic response.

Study of Pushover Analysis on RC Framed Structure with Underground Structure Considering the Effects of Soil Structure Interaction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
Nasala Dongol ◽  
Prachand Man Pradhan ◽  
Suman Manandhar
Keyword(s):  
Soil Structure ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Underground Structure ◽  
Pushover Analysis ◽  
Standard Penetration Test ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Base System ◽  
Building Site ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Fixed Base

This study states that the effects of soil structure interaction on the Reinforced Concrete (RC) framed structures is directly influenced by the soil properties of the site. Here, one preexisting structure is taken for the study. The building is a hospital building with two underground basements. Taking into account the actual soil condition of building site, this study provides idea on the soil structure interaction on the structure The properties of springs are calculated from different standard penetration test (SPT) values, Poisson’s ratio and elasticity of soil along the depth of the soil. Entire soil-foundation-structure system is modelled and analyzed using spring approach. Static analysis, response spectrum analysis and pushover analysis (PA) are done in order to find the variations in natural periods, base shears and deflections of the structures by incorporating soil flexibility as compared to structures with conventional fixed base. Pushover analysis is done to evaluate the performance of the structure when modelled in fixed base and spring base system.

scholarly journals Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on the Seismic Response of Existing Low and Mid-Rise RC Buildings

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 8357
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Oz ◽  
Sevket Murat Senel ◽  
Mehmet Palanci ◽  
Ali Kalkan
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Existing Buildings ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Fixed Base ◽  
New Buildings

Reconnaissance studies performed after destructive earthquakes have shown that seismic performance of existing buildings, especially constructed on weak soils, is significantly low. This situation implies the negative effects of soil-structure interaction on the seismic performance of buildings. In order to investigate these effects, 40 existing buildings from Turkey were selected and nonlinear models were constructed by considering fixed-base and stiff, moderate and soft soil conditions. Buildings designed before and after Turkish Earthquake code of 1998 were grouped as old and new buildings, respectively. Different soil conditions classified according to shear wave velocities were reflected by using substructure method. Inelastic deformation demands were obtained by using nonlinear time history analysis and 20 real acceleration records selected from major earthquakes were used. The results have shown that soil-structure interaction, especially in soft soil cases, significantly affects the seismic response of old buildings. The most significant increase in drift demands occurred in first stories and the results corresponding to fixed-base, stiff and moderate cases are closer to each other with respect to soft soil cases. Distribution of results has indicated that effect of soil-structure interaction on the seismic performance of new buildings is limited with respect to old buildings.

Seismic behavior of structures considering uplift and soil–structure interaction

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1712-1726
Author(s):  
Farhad Behnamfar ◽  
Seyyed Mohammad Mirhosseini ◽  
Hossein Alibabaei
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Behavior ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis ◽  
Steel Structures ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Nonlinear Seismic Response ◽  
Tensile Forces ◽  
Fixed Base ◽  
Flexible Base

A common assumption when analyzing a structure for earthquake forces is that the building is positively attached to a rigid ground so that it can sustain possible tensile forces without being detached, or uplifted, from its bearing points. Considering the facts that almost no tension can be transferred between a surface foundation and soil and soft soils interact with the supported structure during earthquakes, in this research, the effects of uplift and soil–structure interaction on nonlinear seismic response of structures are evaluated. Several reinforced concrete and steel structures under different suits of consistent ground motions are considered. The base of the buildings is modeled with vertical no-tension springs being nonlinear in compression. The total soil–structure interaction system is modeled within OpenSees, and the seismic behavior is evaluated using a nonlinear dynamic analysis. The nonlinear responses of buildings are determined and compared between three cases: fixed base, flexible base without uplift, and flexible base with uplift. The cases for which uplift in conjunction with soil–structure interaction should be considered are identified.

Probabilistic Seismic Soil Structure Interaction Analysis of the Mu¨hleberg Nuclear Power Plant Reactor and SUSAN Buildings

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K. Nakaki ◽  
Philip S. Hashimoto ◽  
James J. Johnson ◽  
Yahya Bayraktarli ◽  
Olivier Zuchuat
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Fixed Base ◽  
Plant Reactor ◽  
Stiffness And Damping

Probabilistic seismic soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis was performed for the Mu¨hleberg Nuclear Power Plant Reactor and SUSAN Buildings in support of the seismic probabilistic saftety assessment of the plant. An efficient hybrid method, employing computer programs SASSI2000 and CLASSI presented in a companion paper, was used in this analysis. The method takes advantage of the capability of SASSI2000 to analyze embedded structures with irregular geometry and the computational efficiency of CLASSI to rapidly perform the SSI response analysis of large structure models. Fixed base finite element models of the buildings were first developed from which the structure geometry, nodal masses, natural frequencies, and mode shapes were extracted. The structure embedments were modeled using SASSI2000. Impedance functions and scattering vectors were calculated by imposing rigid body constraints to the embedded foundation. The fixed base structure dynamic properties and the foundation impedances and scattering functions were input to CLASSI to perform the response analysis. The probabilistic analysis was performed following the Latin Hypercube Simulation (LHS) approach documented in NUREG/CR-2015. Variables defined by probability distributions were sampled according to a stratified sampling approach. The combination of the parameters for each simulation was determined by Latin Hypercube experimental design. Variables in the LHS included the earthquake ground acceleration time histories, structure stiffness and damping, and soil stiffness and damping. Thirty response simulations were performed using CLASSI in which the variable values were randomly selected. The use of CLASSI has the advantage that the response analysis simulations can be executed in a fraction of the time that would be required with SASSI2000 alone. For each simulation, in-structure response spectra (ISRS) were calculated at selected locations in the buildings. Probabilistic distributions, described by the median and 84th percentile response spectra, were calculated from the thirty simulations. The probabilistic ISRS are subsequently used in the seismic fragility evaluations of selected essential equipment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document