The effect of ammonia loading and operating temperature on nitrification and denitrification of a high ammonia landfill leachate

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 524-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. D. Azevedo ◽  
D. S. Mavinic ◽  
H. D. Robinson

The effect of ammonia loading and operating temperature on the treatment of high ammonia, methanogenic, landfill leachate was investigated. Two single-sludge, nitrification–predenitrification systems were operated in parallel: one with a 10-day aerobic solids retention time, and the other with a 20-day aerobic solids retention time. The study consisted of two phases: an ammonia loading phase and a cold temperature phase. From the first phase, it was found that, at an influent leachate ammonia level of up to 1500 mg N/L, both systems produced an effluent of < 1 mg NH4-N/L and approximately 170 mg NOx−-N/L. Aerobic nitrite and anoxic "free" ammonia were both observed to increase as the ammonia loading was increased. When the influent ammonia was raised from 1500 to 2000 mg N/L, nitrification in both systems failed. During the second phase, the temperature was decreased from 20 to 10 °C while maintaining the leachate ammonia level at 1500 mg N/L. Aerobic nitrite accumulation and rising aerobic BOD5 were observed to begin at 14 °C. When the temperature was dropped from 12 to 10 °C, nitrification failed in both systems. In both cases, nitrification was re-established at 10 °C, by ceasing to waste solids and by stopping methanol addition. Key words: ammonia, biological, denitrification, landfill, leachate, nitrification, temperature, treatment.

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 854-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
D M Shiskowski ◽  
D S Mavinic

This bench-scale study investigated the nitrogen-removal capabilities of two different biological process configurations treating methanogenic-state landfill leachate containing up to 1200 mg N/L of ammonia. The first configuration was a pre-denitrification system known as the modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process. Large clarifier sludge recycle flows, set to yield clarifier recycle ratios of 7:1 and 8:1, were evaluated as a means to reduce effluent NOx concentrations. A pre- and post-denitrification system, known as the four-stage Bardenpho process, was the second configuration evaluated. The MLE systems (20 day aerobic solids retention time (SRT)) were capable of producing effluent containing about 50 mg N/L of ammonia and 200-235 mg N/L of total inorganic nitrogen (ammonia + NOx) when treating leachate containing approximately 1200 mg N/L of ammonia. In contrast, effluent from the four-stage Bardenpho system contained less than 1 mg N/L of ammonia and 15 mg N/L of NOx, when treating 1100 mg N/L ammonia leachate. An aerobic number 1 SRT of 20 days (total aerobic SRT approximately equal to 40 days) was used with aerobic number 1 and clarifier sludge recycle ratios of 4:1 and 3:1, respectively. The ammonia-removal potential of both systems was clearly demonstrated but each system also showed certain disadvantages, characteristic of each process.Key words: ammonia-N, anoxic denitrification, leachate treatment, nitrification, pre-denitrification.


2016 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 44-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halis Simsek ◽  
Murthy Kasi ◽  
Jae-Bom Ohm ◽  
Sudhir Murthy ◽  
Eakalak Khan

1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 101-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Siegrist ◽  
W. Gujer

Denitrification in the secondary clarifier can contribute substantially to the nitrogen removal of activated sludge systems. This is illustrated on two treatment plants with different secondary clarifier systems. A model to estimate denitrification capacity and to design activated sludge systems for nitrogen removal is developed and verified with data from two treatment plants. The model includes denitrification in the secondary clarifier, wastewater composition (soluble readily biodegradable COD, particulate degradable COD), oxygen input into the anoxic volume, temperature, and solids retention time (SRT). The influence of aerated grit chambers and primary sedimentation on denitrification is discussed.


Water SA ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Noutsopoulos ◽  
D Mamais ◽  
A Andreadakis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document