Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 905-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujit Kumar Dash ◽  
K Rajagopal ◽  
N R Krishnaswamy

A series of laboratory model tests have been performed to study the behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading. The strain in geocell walls, pressure transmitted to the subgrade soil, and deformations in the subgrade were measured during the tests to develop an understanding of the mechanism of geocell reinforcement. The pattern of strain variation in the geocell walls indicates that the geocell mattress behaves as a composite beam supported by the subgrade soil. The load dispersion in the geocell mattress is found to be governed by factors such as geometry of the geocell layer and its placement position under the footing.Key words: soil reinforcement, geocell, sand, behaviour, strip loading.






2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Dong Cui ◽  
Qiang Yuan ◽  
Jia-Qiang Yang
Keyword(s):  


Fluids ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Yang ◽  
Patrik Andreasson ◽  
Penghua Teng ◽  
Qiancheng Xie

Most of the hydropower dams in Sweden were built before 1980. The present dam-safety guidelines have resulted in higher design floods than their spillway discharge capacity and the need for structural upgrades. This has led to renewed laboratory model tests. For some dams, even computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are performed. This provides the possibility to compare the spillway discharge data between the model tests performed a few decades apart. The paper presents the hydropower development, the needs for the ongoing dam rehabilitations and the history of physical hydraulic modeling in Sweden. More than 20 spillways, both surface and bottom types, are analyzed to evaluate their discharge modeling accuracy. The past and present model tests are compared with each other and with the CFD results if available. Discrepancies do exist in the discharges between the model tests made a few decades apart. The differences fall within the range −8.3%–+11.2%. The reasons for the discrepancies are sought from several aspects. The primary source of the errors is seemingly the model construction quality and flow measurement method. The machine milling technique and 3D printing reduce the source of construction errors and improve the model quality. Results of the CFD simulations differ, at the maximum, by 3.8% from the physical tests. They are conducted without knowledge of the physical model results in advance. Following the best practice guidelines, CFD should generate results of decent accuracy for discharge prediction.



1999 ◽  
pp. 135-144
Author(s):  
Takaya HIGUCHI ◽  
Hisashi AOKI ◽  
Kenji ISHIHARA ◽  
Yoshimichi TSUKAMOTO ◽  
Takayuki MASUO


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gichul Kweon ◽  
Sanglok Kim ◽  
Seokwoo Hong


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Niroumand ◽  
Khairul Anuar Kassim ◽  
Ramli Nazir


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 1306-1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Joo Lee ◽  
Richard H Bassett

In congested urban areas, tunnel excavations have become necessary due to a lack of space. In many cases, such excavations are needed in areas adjacent to existing loaded piles. Therefore, a careful assessment of the wall–soil–tunnel interaction is required. These circumstances are relatively new, however, and only limited information is currently available. The complicated soil behaviour, particularly for the shear failure pattern between the wall and tunnel observed in both physical tests and numerical analyses, has not been clearly identified by other researchers. The authors have conducted laboratory model tests on an idealized granular medium using close-range photogrammetric techniques to measure detailed displacement patterns. The results have been compared with those from numerical analyses. This paper presents shear failure patterns for a number of geometries and shows good agreement between the physical tests and the finite element analyses.Key words: tunnel excavation, shear deformation patterns, wall–soil–tunnel interaction, model tests, photogrammetry, finite element analysis.



2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangzhi Yin ◽  
Guangzhi Li ◽  
Zuoan Wei ◽  
Ling Wan ◽  
Guohong Shui ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document