Fuels on disturbed and undisturbed sites in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA

2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1134-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Waldrop ◽  
Lucy Brudnak ◽  
Sandra Rideout-Hanzak

Fuel distribution in the southern Appalachian Mountain region was measured in over 1000 study plots that were stratified by topographic position (aspect and slope position) and disturbance history. Few fuel differences occurred among topographic positions for undisturbed plots, indicating that fuel accumulation is no greater on highly productive sites than on less productive sites. Litter was slightly higher on undisturbed upper slopes (4.2 t/ha) than on lower slopes (3.7 t/ha) but woody fuels showed no significant differences. Rhododendron ( Rhododendron spp.) and mountain laurel ( Kalmia latifolia L.) were less common than expected, occurring on 25% and 42% of sampled plots, respectively. Disturbance history and type played a greater role in determining fuel loads than did topographic position. Disturbances had occurred on 30% of sample plots within the past 10 years and were most common on exposed slopes. Litter was significantly lower in burned plots (3.5 t/ha vs. 4.0 t/ha in undisturbed plots). One-hour fuels (1.0 t/ha) were significantly higher on beetle-killed plots than on undisturbed plots (0.7 t/ha) while larger woody fuels tended to be greater in plots subjected to beetle attack, fire, and wind.


Plant Disease ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 95 (7) ◽  
pp. 811-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. M. Meadows ◽  
D. C. Zwart ◽  
S. N. Jeffers ◽  
T. A. Waldrop ◽  
W. C. Bridges

The National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study was initiated to study the effects of fuel reduction treatments on forest ecosystems. Four fuel reduction treatments were applied to three sites in a southern Appalachian Mountain forest in western North Carolina: prescribed burning, mechanical fuel reduction, mechanical fuel reduction followed by prescribed burning, and a nontreated control. To determine the effects of fuel reduction treatments on Phytophthora spp. in soil, incidences were assessed once before and twice after fuel reduction treatments were applied. Also, the efficiency of the baiting bioassay used to detect species of Phytophthora was evaluated, and the potential virulence of isolates of Phytophthora spp. collected from forest soils was determined. Phytophthora cinnamomi and P. heveae were the only two species recovered from the study site. Incidences of these species were not significantly affected by fuel reduction treatments, but incidence of P. cinnamomi increased over time. In the baiting bioassay, camellia leaf disks were better than hemlock needles as baits. P. cinnamomi was detected best in fresh soil, whereas P. heveae was detected best when soil was air-dried and remoistened prior to baiting. Isolates of P. heveae were weakly virulent and, therefore, potentially pathogenic—causing lesions only on wounded mountain laurel and rhododendron leaves; however, isolates of P. cinnamomi were virulent and caused root rot and mortality on mountain laurel and white pine plants.



2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-149
Author(s):  
Amy N. Wright ◽  
Robert D. Wright ◽  
Brian E. Jackson ◽  
Jake F. Browder

Abstract Post-transplant root growth is critical for landscape plant establishment. The Horhizotron™ provides a way to easily measure root growth in a wide range of rhizosphere conditions. Mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia L.) plants were removed from their containers and planted in Horhizotrons in a greenhouse in Auburn, AL, and outdoors in Blacksburg, VA. Each Horhizotron contained four glass quadrants extending away from the root ball, and each quadrant within a Horhizotron was filled with a different substrate (treatment): 1) 100% pine bark (Pinus taeda L., PB), 2) 100% soil, 3) a mixture of 50:50 (by vol) PB:soil, or 4) 100% soil along the bottom of the quadrant to a depth of 10 cm (4 in) and 100% PB layered 10 cm (4 in) deep on top of the soil. Root growth along the glass panes of each quadrant was measured bi-weekly in Auburn and weekly in Blacksburg. In both locations, roots were longer in all treatments containing pine bark than in 100% soil. When pine bark was layered on top of soil, roots grew into the pine bark but did not grow into the soil. Results suggest that amending soil backfill with pine bark can increase post-transplant root growth of container-grown mountain laurel.



2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiko Hasegawa ◽  
Akane Meguro ◽  
Kazuhiro Toyoda ◽  
Tomio Nishimura ◽  
Hitoshi Kunoh


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (14) ◽  
pp. 3045-3060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Raulerson ◽  
C. Rhett Jackson ◽  
Nathan D. Melear ◽  
Seth E. Younger ◽  
Maura Dudley ◽  
...  


CATENA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie B. Stine ◽  
Lynn M. Resler ◽  
James B. Campbell


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Baugh ◽  
Robert E. Evans


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document