scholarly journals Next-to-leading order QCD predictions for top-quark pair production with up to three jets

Author(s):  
S. Höche ◽  
P. Maierhöfer ◽  
N. Moretti ◽  
S. Pozzorini ◽  
F. Siegert
2015 ◽  
Vol 748 ◽  
pp. 74-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Höche ◽  
Frank Krauss ◽  
Philipp Maierhöfer ◽  
Stefano Pozzorini ◽  
Marek Schönherr ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (08) ◽  
pp. 1357-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. BERNREUTHER ◽  
A. BRANDENBURG ◽  
Z. G. SI ◽  
P. UWER

Top quark-antiquark [Formula: see text] pairs will be produced copiously at the Tevatron collider and in huge numbers at the LHC. This will make possible detailed investigations of the properties and interactions of this quark flavor. The analysis and interpretation of future data requires precise predictions of the hadronic production of [Formula: see text] pairs and of their subsequent decays. In this talk the reactions [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] are considered and results are presented of our calculation6 of the dilepton angular distribution at next-to-leading order QCD, keeping the full dependence on the spins of the intermediate [Formula: see text] state. The angular distribution is determined for different choices of reference axes that can be identified with the t and [Formula: see text] spin axes. While the QCD corrections to the leading-order distribution turn out to be small in the case of the LHC, we find them to be sizeable in the case of the Tevatron and find, moreover, the angular distribution to be sensitive to the parton content of the proton.


2021 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Mazzitelli ◽  
Pier Francesco Monni ◽  
Paolo Nason ◽  
Emanuele Re ◽  
Marius Wiesemann ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Cormier ◽  
Simon Plätzer ◽  
Christian Reuschle ◽  
Peter Richardson ◽  
Stephen Webster

Abstract We evaluate the theoretical uncertainties in next-to-leading order plus parton shower predictions for top quark pair production and decay in hadronic collisions. Our work is carried out using the Herwig  7 event generator and presents an in-depth study of variations in matching schemes with two systematically different shower algorithms, the traditional angular-ordered and alternative dipole shower. We also present all of the required extensions of the Herwig dipole shower algorithm to properly take into account quark mass effects, as well as its ability to perform top quark decays. The predictions are compared at parton level as well as to Large Hadron Collider data, including in the boosted regime. We find that the regions where predictions with a non-top-quark-specific tune differ drastically from data are plagued by large uncertainties which are consistent between our two shower and matching algorithms.


2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bevilacqua ◽  
M. Czakon ◽  
C. G. Papadopoulos ◽  
M. Worek

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Chen ◽  
Oliver Dekkers ◽  
Dennis Heisler ◽  
Werner Bernreuther ◽  
Zong-Guo Si

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Caola ◽  
Frédéric A. Dreyer ◽  
Ross W. McDonald ◽  
Gavin P. Salam

Abstract Top-quark pair production is central to many facets of LHC physics. At leading order, the top and anti-top are produced in a back-to-back topology, however this topology accounts only for a minority of the events with TeV-scale momentum transfer that contain a $$ t\overline{t} $$ t t ¯ pair. The remaining events instead involve the splitting of an initial or final-state gluon to $$ t\overline{t} $$ t t ¯ . We provide simple quantitative arguments that explain why this is the case, and examine the interplay between different topologies and a range of variables that characterise the event hardness. We then develop a method to classify the topologies of individual events and use it to illustrate our findings in the context of simulated events, using both top partons and suitably defined fiducial tops. For events with large $$ t\overline{t} $$ t t ¯ invariant mass, we comment on additional features that have important experimental and theoretical implications.


2010 ◽  
Vol 205-206 ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Ahrens ◽  
A. Ferroglia ◽  
M. Neubert ◽  
B.D. Pecjak ◽  
L.L. Yang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document