Optimal Tax Reform in the Presence of Adjustment Costs

2019 ◽  
pp. 33-58
Author(s):  
George R. Zodrow
2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID DOMEIJ ◽  
PAUL KLEIN

In constitutional democracies, laws take time to be deliberated upon, to be passed, and to be implemented. Motivated by this observation, we study the properties of optimal tax reform when it has to be announced in advance of its implementation. We find that a delay between announcement and implementation has large effects on the optimal fiscal policy during the transition to the new steady state. On the other hand, we find that the welfare gains from optimal tax reform are fairly robust to the introduction of an implementation lag. Increasing the lag from zero to four years reduces the welfare gains by less than a quarter. Moreover, it turns out that this reduction of the welfare gain is mainly due to the delay itself rather than the effect of preannouncement on the character of the optimal tax reform.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-125
Author(s):  
Redo Alpha Hernando ◽  
Dian Wahyudin

In a tax policy, the measure of success lies in the tax administration itself. To provide optimal services to the community, tax reform is needed in the form of modernizing tax administration. The purpose of the modernization of tax administration is to increase tax compliance, increase public trust (trust), and increase the integrity of the tax apparatus. This study aims to provide an overview of how the modernization of tax administration can improve tax services and the ease that can be felt by taxpayers in complying with tax obligations and improve the integrity of tax officials in the management of the tax. The method used in this writing is descriptive qualitative, where the approach used is the study of literature. The results of this paper are an increase in state revenue from the tax sector, increased compliance and more optimal tax services by modernizing digital-based tax administration


Author(s):  
Eduardo Zambrano

In this chapter I propose a comprehensive framework for the evaluation of policy reforms that have both winners and losers. The starting point of the analysis is the identification of what individuals have a right to. The next step is the identification of principles of efficiency, fairness, and robustness out of which a social ordering function can be constructed for the ranking of social states. The resulting methodology gives priority in the social evaluation to the situation of those individuals who are being treated the most unfairly by policies, relative to what they have a right to. The chapter aims to illustrate how to implement the methodology in a situation involving tax reform.


1992 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
George R. Zodrow
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
pp. 39-58
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Dallera
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document